ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Hall of Classics (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=32)
-   -   The list of 85 by Roastmaster Saul Good. And hey, it's actually saul good. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=273212)

Bowser 06-25-2013 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9775220)
This is boring and gay.

Mods, move this to the Boring and Gay Subforum.

Hammock Parties 06-25-2013 06:54 PM

Using "gay" as a pejorative is really offensive, you guys.

Aren't we beyond that in 2013?

Marcellus 06-25-2013 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9775242)
Using "gay" as a pejorative is really offensive, you guys.

Aren't we beyond that in 2013?

It's oly offensive if you are a bundle of sticks.

ShortRoundChief 06-25-2013 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 9775231)
Well I didn't. I posted it RIGHT ****ING HERE so the entire ****ing board now knows that your mom is boring and gay.

Gay is one thing, however, the term "boring"is entirely subjective. We're going to need definitive proof in order to take you at your word.

cabletech94 06-25-2013 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9775242)
Using "gay" as a pejorative is really offensive, you guys.

Aren't we beyond that in 2013?

wut? are you new?

this is the effing Chiefs Planet!!!!!

say it loud, and say it proud!!!

ShortRoundChief 06-25-2013 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cabletech94 (Post 9775249)
wut? are you new?

this is the effing Chiefs Planet!!!!!

say it loud, and say it proud!!!

We're here, it's clear, I drink beer, Clays queer.

Wheew felt great to get that pressure off my chest.

DaFace 06-25-2013 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia (Post 9774692)
You've mentioned that more than once now. You've read Hootie's explanation one too many times. Just because Hootie says it a lot doesn't make it true.

I'm not sure what this means or what you think I'm implying. Was that not the first event that happened that kicked off two years of on again off again bans?

Bowser 06-25-2013 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 9775272)
I'm not sure what this means or what you think I'm implying. Was that not the first event that happened that kicked off two years of on again off again bans?

Are you going to put up with that attitude? You should ban him.

loochy 06-25-2013 07:04 PM

Ban each other!

It'll be like when Ho Kogan and Ultimate Warrior clotheslined each other at WrestleMania VI

DaFace 06-25-2013 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9775196)
I was under the impression it couldn't be done without TONS of work. I wouldn't know how to do that work, but again, there are lines that should NOT be crossed here and that's one of them. PM's are supposed to be private. Period. So, this is a discussion we'll be having in the mod lounge.

People can report PM's so that they're posted in the mod forum intact (so that there's no question of whether it was edited for impact). There are also plugins out there that can give mods the power to log in as another user, though it's not anything that's installed on CP. There's no built-in way for mods to view PM's though.

Mr. Flopnuts 06-25-2013 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 9775287)
People can report PM's so that they're posted in the mod forum intact (so that there's no question of whether it was edited for impact). There are also plugins out there that can give mods the power to log in as another user, though it's not anything that's installed on CP. There's no built-in way for mods to view PM's though.

Yeah, reported PM's. I forgot about those. Otherwise though, I think they should be untouchable.

In any case, OP is updated.

DaFace 06-25-2013 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 9775277)
Are you going to put up with that attitude? You should ban him.

One would have to be a mod to ban people. :)

'Hamas' Jenkins 06-25-2013 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 9775279)
Ho Kogan

http://distilleryimage9.ak.instagram...380fbca8_7.jpg

Saul Good 06-25-2013 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 9775287)
People can report PM's so that they're posted in the mod forum intact (so that there's no question of whether it was edited for impact). There are also plugins out there that can give mods the power to log in as another user, though it's not anything that's installed on CP. There's no built-in way for mods to view PM's though.

Change email address of user to your own
Reset password.
log in as user using password that was emailed to you
??????
Profit

loochy 06-25-2013 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9775293)

ROFL we comin fo you n***a!

Saul Good 06-25-2013 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9775290)
Yeah, reported PM's. I forgot about those. Otherwise though, I think they should be untouchable.

In any case, OP is updated.

Something about "Luv by Mr. Flopnuts" seems off putting.

DaFace 06-25-2013 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 9775297)
Change email address of user to your own
Reset password.
log in as user using password that was emailed to you
??????
Profit

Well, mods can change passwords directly - there's no need for all the email business. However, they can't SEE passwords, so there'd be no way to put it back afterward. So yes, they could get in and take a look, but it would be pretty obvious something was up if the user tried to log back in and couldn't.

Mr. Flopnuts 06-25-2013 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 9775305)
Something about "Luv by Mr. Flopnuts" seems off putting.

ROFL Douche. I mean, touche!

Bearcat 06-25-2013 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 9775240)
Mods, move this to the Boring and Gay Subforum.

Pretend I created a forum, named it Bowser, moved this thread to it and left a link in the Lounge.

Hootie 06-25-2013 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9774726)
That's odd. Hootie doesn't seem the vicious type.

and I'm not.

I still feel like what I said was TIC...it was a ridiculous scenario. It wasn't nearly as bad as the 'reerun breeder' comment made by DaneMcCloud...and it was set off by a user harassing me doing something he was already told to never do again.

but shh...if OTWP sees this he's going to make it out to be like I said the worst thing in the history of the internet...

even though now this board thinks rape is funny, anti-freeze deaths are cool, AIDS trees are legit, and little girls losing their feet on a Six Flags ride is hilarious

but make a comment about a person's significant other that you don't even know and apparently that's crossing some line that results in lifelong bans

but call someone with a special needs child (that you also don't know) a 'reerun breeder' is just funny and harmless

so excuse me if I remain a little bit confused here

Hootie 06-25-2013 07:46 PM

people have called me a vicious rapist on this board for years now because I told a story about hooking up with a drunk ex-girlfriend who told me she wanted me to **** her

but calling me a rapist is all fun and games and not off limits

I'm just never going to agree that I deserved a 2 year ban. It was ridiculous.

Donger 06-25-2013 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unnecessary drama (Post 9775382)
and I'm not.

I still feel like what I said was TIC...it was a ridiculous scenario. It wasn't nearly as bad as the 'reerun breeder' comment made by DaneMcCloud...and it was set off by a user harassing me doing something he was already told to never do again.

but shh...if OTWP sees this he's going to make it out to be like I said the worst thing in the history of the internet...

even though now this board thinks rape is funny, anti-freeze deaths are cool, AIDS trees are legit, and little girls losing their feet on a Six Flags ride is hilarious

but make a comment about a person's significant other that you don't even know and apparently that's crossing some line that results in lifelong bans

but call someone with a special needs child (that you also don't know) a 'reerun breeder' is just funny and harmless

so excuse me if I remain a little bit confused here

Perhaps you're not aware of this, Hootie, but you aren't Dane. I think it has been mentioned or asked in this very thread, but are you not aware of the concept of cumulative?

Hootie 06-25-2013 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9775389)
Perhaps you're not aware of this, Hootie, but you aren't Dane. I think it has been mentioned or asked in this very thread, but are you not aware of the concept of cumulative?

are you trying to say Dane is above the law but I am not?

why is this? Because he's been here longer?

Dane is a vicious, attacking, downright MEAN poster 90% of the time. He has said things that are so ridiculous (reerun breeder) that I'm 100% convinced my banning was 100% personal vendetta related.

There is no reason my posts were removed and I was subsequently banned for 2 years and Dane gets 1 day for filter evasion.

If you really think he adds more to this board you're insane. We're probably about even. We both can hold our own when we stay on topic and talk football, and we both can get easily sidetracked by dipshit debates like these where we'll eventually take something too far and it will result in a banning for me and a 'lol oh Dane!!!!' for him.

Hammock Parties 06-25-2013 07:50 PM

Some Planeteers are more equal than others, Hootie.

Hootie 06-25-2013 07:50 PM

all I'm trying to say is...

whatever, I was banned. It seems like all parties are willing to let me post here again. Awesome. That's nice. I like this place.

but admitting I deserved to be banned that long? It'll never happen.

Because I truly believe it was wrong and ridiculous. And no one is going to prove to me otherwise.

Donger 06-25-2013 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unnecessary drama (Post 9775401)
are you trying to say Dane is above the law but I am not?

why is this? Because he's been here longer?

Dane is a vicious, attacking, downright MEAN poster 90% of the time. He has said things that are so ridiculous (reerun breeder) that I'm 100% convinced my banning was 100% personal vendetta related.

There is no reason my posts were removed and I was subsequently banned for 2 years and Dane gets 1 day for filter evasion.

If you really think he adds more to this board you're insane. We're probably about even. We both can hold our own when we stay on topic and talk football, and we both can get easily sidetracked by dipshit debates like these where we'll eventually take something too far and it will result in a banning for me and a 'lol oh Dane!!!!' for him.

Okay, so you apparently are not aware of what cumulative means. Good to know.

Marcellus 06-25-2013 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unnecessary drama (Post 9775401)
are you trying to say Dane is above the law but I am not?

why is this? Because he's been here longer?

Dane is a vicious, attacking, downright MEAN poster 90% of the time. He has said things that are so ridiculous (reerun breeder) that I'm 100% convinced my banning was 100% personal vendetta related.

There is no reason my posts were removed and I was subsequently banned for 2 years and Dane gets 1 day for filter evasion.

If you really think he adds more to this board you're insane. We're probably about even. We both can hold our own when we stay on topic and talk football, and we both can get easily sidetracked by dipshit debates like these where we'll eventually take something too far and it will result in a banning for me and a 'lol oh Dane!!!!' for him.

It never has occurred to me before but yea you and Dane probably are pretty much equal here.

Hammock Parties 06-25-2013 07:54 PM

Dane's "cumulative" behavior is pretty abhorrent, you know.

Makes Hootie look like a little innocent flower child of love.

Hootie 06-25-2013 07:55 PM

I know exactly what cumulative means.

I was never on thin ince here until Phil came back from WPI and Fatchatter and wanted to be alpha mod again.

Never. Sometimes I'd get temp bans for a day to a week for being too drunk on Sunday's and leaving my laptop at the bar within reach of my idiot roommates...

but at no point was I ever in threat of a permaban...you don't just permaban 6 year regulars who are every day posters

that's ridiculous...and not what the Planet was ever about

Donger 06-25-2013 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9775434)
Dane's "cumulative" behavior is pretty abhorrent, you know.

Makes Hootie look like a little innocent flower child of love.

How so, GoChiefs?

Hammock Parties 06-25-2013 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9775440)
How so, GoChiefs?

Really? He's been the biggest prick on this forum for years.

Donger 06-25-2013 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unnecessary drama (Post 9775438)
I know exactly what cumulative means.

I was never on thin ince here until Phil came back from WPI and Fatchatter and wanted to be alpha mod again.

Never. Sometimes I'd get temp bans for a day to a week for being too drunk on Sunday's and leaving my laptop at the bar within reach of my idiot roommates...

but at no point was I ever in threat of a permaban...you don't just permaban 6 year regulars who are every day posters

that's ridiculous...and not what the Planet was ever about

So, it seems that you don't know what cumulative means.

Hootie 06-25-2013 07:57 PM

Phil came back and started the whole 'filter evasion' controversy which he banned Clay for (because of a WPI vendetta) and which Coffey infracted me in an immunity thread where Kyle gave us all free reign to break any rule (the Clay thread)...

so his return to alpha moderator resulted in two of the biggest controversies this site has seen in the past 4 years

why?

because he moderates for attention...not the good of the board as he so claims

Hammock Parties 06-25-2013 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unnecessary drama (Post 9775438)
but at no point was I ever in threat of a permaban...you don't just permaban 6 year regulars who are every day posters

I agree, it was bullshit.

Now can you please shut the **** about it?

Hootie 06-25-2013 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9775424)
It never has occurred to me before but yea you and Dane probably are pretty much equal here.

pretty much

we have similar pros and cons

Donger 06-25-2013 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9775442)
Really? He's been the biggest prick on this forum for years.

Anything ban-worthy, like Hootie?

Hootie 06-25-2013 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9775447)
I agree, it was bullshit.

Now can you please shut the **** about it?

I didn't say anything about it all day and I got back to Flopnuts arguing with Frazod about it...

figured I'd set the record straight again

Hammock Parties 06-25-2013 07:58 PM

hehe

made myself laugh

SHUT THE **** ABOUT IT!

SHUT THE ****!

DaFace 06-25-2013 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9775450)
Anything ban-worthy, like Hootie?

Depends on who you ask.

Hootie 06-25-2013 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9775450)
Anything ban-worthy, like Hootie?

made sexually explicit remarks about R8ers 16 year old daughter and called BossChief a reerun breeder

so uh

...yeah?

Hammock Parties 06-25-2013 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9775450)
Anything ban-worthy, like Hootie?

Probably.

He's a dick beyond anything Hootie could manufacture.

Donger 06-25-2013 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 9775452)
Depends on who you ask.

I understand that. And, I don't envy you your duties. But, surely recidivism plays a part, no?

threebag 06-25-2013 07:59 PM

http://fc00.deviantart.net/fs25/f/20...isui_hyena.jpg

Hootie 06-25-2013 08:00 PM

I would never ban Dane. He's a CP legend.

I'm just saying...on this site where AIDS are funny, rape is cool, etc...

why are you permabanning regular contributors that are Chiefs fans? It's horrible practice. This isn't Orange Mane. This is a loosely moderated board, and it has always been. And that's why it is great.

DaFace 06-25-2013 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unnecessary drama (Post 9775456)
made sexually explicit remarks about R8ers 16 year old daughter and called BossChief a reerun breeder

so uh

...yeah?

That first one's a bit of a stretch. He made a general comment about R8ers daughter without knowing anything about her.

As for the BossChief thing...yeah, there's that.

Donger 06-25-2013 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unnecessary drama (Post 9775456)
made sexually explicit remarks about R8ers 16 year old daughter and called BossChief a reerun breeder

so uh

...yeah?

Those aren't bannable offenses.

Hootie 06-25-2013 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9775465)
Those aren't bannable offenses.

LMAO

If the BossChief one isn't a bannable offense, then whatever I said about said poster isn't even close to a bannable offense.

Saul Good 06-25-2013 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9775424)
It never has occurred to me before but yea you and Dane probably are pretty much equal here.

I suppose so. Both of them argue solely in absolutes. Everything is either black or white.

When Dane doesn't like you, he yells every swear word he knows...hootie roasts you. Both have been accused of being sexual predators based on their posts here. Both of them have taken long vacations from CP. Dane had a secretary who stripped on weekends with the stage name "hootie". Hootie raped a girl named "Kennedy"...okay, maybe not equal...but close.

Donger 06-25-2013 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unnecessary drama (Post 9775468)
LMAO

If the BossChief one isn't a bannable offense, then whatever I said about said poster isn't even close to a bannable offense.

Would you like a link to the FAQ section, where bannable offenses are spelled out?

Hootie 06-25-2013 08:02 PM

I don't know what to tell you Donger.

I'm not a fan favorite here. I rub way more people the wrong way than anyone else.

That said...why was the poll 95% in favor of me not being banned?

???

If 95% of a website you're a regular doesn't want you banned...when you're me...that says something.

Hootie 06-25-2013 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9775473)
Would you like a link to the FAQ section, where bannable offenses are spelled out?

No.

Donger 06-25-2013 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unnecessary drama (Post 9775474)
I don't know what to tell you Donger.

I'm not a fan favorite here. I rub way more people the wrong way than anyone else.

That said...why was the poll 95% in favor of me not being banned?

???

If 95% of a website you're a regular doesn't want you banned...when you're me...that says something.

I don't know what you are talking about, so I really don't have an opinion on the matter.

Donger 06-25-2013 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unnecessary drama (Post 9775476)
No.

Are you aware of the bannable offenses?

Hammock Parties 06-25-2013 08:04 PM

hootie, you were wronged

i think most reasonable people here see that

now please

shut the ****

Donger 06-25-2013 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9775487)
hootie, you were wronged

i think most reasonable people here see that

now please

shut the ****

He wasn't wronged. He took things too far. He's like Anokin Skywaler.

DaFace 06-25-2013 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9775487)
hootie, you were wronged

i think most reasonable people here see that

now please

shut the ****

Pretty much.

Hammock Parties 06-25-2013 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9775491)
He wasn't wronged. He took things too far. He's like Anokin Skywaler.

A two-year ban on this board...for anything short of spamming NSFW material...is being wronged.

threebag 06-25-2013 08:08 PM

Gushing Estrogen

kstater 06-25-2013 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daface
Out of curiosity, what on the list is it that you're suggesting he violated?


I would presume the newly created stroke the mod ego rule.

Saul Good 06-25-2013 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unnecessary drama (Post 9775462)
I would never ban Dane. He's a CP legend.

I'm just saying...on this site where AIDS are funny, rape is cool, etc...

why are you permabanning regular contributors that are Chiefs fans? It's horrible practice. This isn't Orange Mane. This is a loosely moderated board, and it has always been. And that's why it is great.

Saying" AIDS are funny"...as if you are pluralizing AIDS...is funny.

Donger 06-25-2013 08:09 PM

DaFace:

Respect for Moderator Team

Moderators are members of the site first and leadership secondarily. Nobody expects you to kiss their ass or accept every decision as perfect and final. However, if you dispute a decision in which you were moderated, you may wish to use some tact if you expect to gain any favor. Use some common sense and you should be fine. Attack and disrespect the leadership and we offer no apologies for the duration of your vacation from this site.

You have received a permanent ban in the past


If you have received a permanent ban and you come back under another ID, you can be banned at any time for no reason. If you are banned, communication with the forum is prohibited. This means no videos, pictures, or text is to be posted on your behalf in the open forum by a proxy.

NewChief 06-25-2013 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 9775495)
Pretty much.

Thirds. I swear he has his posts in this argument saved in a clipboard and pastes them in when it comes up. He absolutely loves to talk about it. I guess it's his defining moment on here. Hootie, there is still glory to be had. Stop living in the past.

Frazod 06-25-2013 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unnecessary drama (Post 9775462)
I would never ban Dane. He's a CP legend.

I'm just saying...on this site where AIDS are funny, rape is cool, etc...

why are you permabanning regular contributors that are Chiefs fans? It's horrible practice. This isn't Orange Mane. This is a loosely moderated board, and it has always been. And that's why it is great.

Yeah, the board nearly folded while you were gone. Thank God Flopnuts rescued your drunk ass from the abyss before the internet imploded. :rolleyes:

You're just another loudmouth idiot. We got along fine without you last time. We'll get along fine without you next time.

Really.

Donger 06-25-2013 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9775500)
A two-year ban on this board...for anything short of spamming NSFW material...is being wronged.

That's opinion, yes?

Hootie 06-25-2013 08:11 PM

you guys are right

I should've just stayed away from it this time.

My apologies. I'll be done for the night.

DaFace 06-25-2013 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9775508)
DaFace:

Respect for Moderator Team

Moderators are members of the site first and leadership secondarily. Nobody expects you to kiss their ass or accept every decision as perfect and final. However, if you dispute a decision in which you were moderated, you may wish to use some tact if you expect to gain any favor. Use some common sense and you should be fine. Attack and disrespect the leadership and we offer no apologies for the duration of your vacation from this site.

You have received a permanent ban in the past


If you have received a permanent ban and you come back under another ID, you can be banned at any time for no reason. If you are banned, communication with the forum is prohibited. This means no videos, pictures, or text is to be posted on your behalf in the open forum by a proxy.

Hell, I've disrespected a moderator in this very thread. Guess I'd better pack my bags.

Donger 06-25-2013 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 9775514)
Hell, I've disrespected a moderator in this very thread. Guess I'd better pack my bags.

I'd agree that that is somewhat specious. The other?

Donger 06-25-2013 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unnecessary drama (Post 9775513)
you guys are right

I should've just stayed away from it this time.

My apologies. I'll be done for the night.

Good boy. You are trainable after all.

Bugeater 06-25-2013 08:13 PM

That "Respect for Moderator Team" rule makes me LOL every time I read it. What a ****ing load of horseshit.

NewChief 06-25-2013 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9775524)
Good boy. You are trainable after all.

If only you were.

Donger 06-25-2013 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewChief (Post 9775526)
If only you were.

Pardon?

Hammock Parties 06-25-2013 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9775528)
Pardon?

What he means is you are a shit poster.

You are completely incapable of changing that status.

DaFace 06-25-2013 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9775522)
I'd agree that that is somewhat specious. The other?

Eh, that one's just a shitty rule. I know it's a needed rule just so that people can't just come back willy nilly after a ban, but it seems bizarre that someone who has been back for quite a while should be able to be banned on a whim if they're not doing anything wrong.

Hammock Parties 06-25-2013 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater (Post 9775525)
That "Respect for Moderator Team" rule makes me LOL every time I read it. What a ****ing load of horseshit.

Just make sure you post ONE GIF in response to it, and not nine copies of the same GIF.

Donger 06-25-2013 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9775532)
What he means is you are a shit poster.

You are completely incapable of changing that status.

Thanks for your input.

Hammock Parties 06-25-2013 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9775535)
Thanks for your input.

Don't take this as me getting pissy at you.

I enjoy your shit posting.

But know what you are.

http://newton64.ca/images/TheMoreYouKnow.gif

Donger 06-25-2013 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 9775533)
Eh, that one's just a shitty rule. I know it's a needed rule just so that people can't just come back willy nilly after a ban, but it seems bizarre that someone who has been back for quite a while should be able to be banned on a whim if they're not doing anything wrong.

Well, according to Phobia, his allowed return was prefaced on his behaving this time, no?

Donger 06-25-2013 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith HATER (Post 9775537)
Don't take this as me getting pissy at you.

I enjoy your shit posting.

But know what you are.

http://newton64.ca/images/TheMoreYouKnow.gif

I think you are aware of the stock I place on your opinions about such things, GoChiefs.

tk13 06-25-2013 08:18 PM

Hey Hootie, what happened to get you banned? I think we need to go over that again.

DaFace 06-25-2013 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9775539)
Well, according to Phobia, his allowed return was prefaced on his behaving this time, no?

Technically correct.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.