DJ's left nut |
01-01-2013 01:46 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence
(Post 9261634)
Don't know if this shit has been posted......but it could make some ****ing sense.
Pioli got an extension. The backlash (SOC) and our shitty season caused Clark to want Pioli out. They're working on a buy out as we speak.
|
Here's what makes no sense about this scenario - Clark Hunt has zero leverage.
Negotiate a buyout? Why? !@#$ you very much, Clark - you signed a contract and you will pay it off.
The only reason the Pioli people would have any motivation to settle would be if Pioli had a 2nd job already lined up. The reason being that if there is no 'settlement' and Hunt has to fire him and pay him the amount in his contract, that amount would be off-set by any salary that Pioli gets in his next job (the damages will have been mitigated).
If Pioli had, say, a million dollar gig lined up, he would want to get a buyout rather than a breach of contract payment because any salary he then draws would be in addition to the buyout, rather than in lieu of a breach of contract payment. So let's say he's owed $5 million, he would be wise to accept a $4.5 million buyout and take a $1 million salary in his next gig, for a total of $5.5 million. If he forces the firing and leans on the contract language for his 'owed' salary, that million he gets from the next employer would just serve to offset the damages owed under the first contract and he'd end up at $5 million...just from two different employers.
Alternatively, Hunt could be threatening to fire him for cause, but that seems unlikely. The ageism suit hasn't been resolved, so you're trying to use mere allegations at this point to justify termination for cause and that's just not likely to stick.
I dunno...in the end I don't think this is a buyout thing. I think Hunt really still believes in Pioli's football acumen and his hopeful that the next coach (even a 'name' coach) will want to work with him.
|