Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 9182547)

Where is the line on "defending myself"?

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY (Post 9182552)

Some things should be self evident jazz.

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 9182515)

Well some of us don't seem to mind living at the mercy of others. Some of us do.

This is a big deal to me. The biggest deal. I'll listen your arguments on taxation, abortion, school prayer, whatever, and hear you out. That's fine. But if you oppose my right to defend myself, you are my enemy, and you can go ****ing die. The End.

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 9182547)

Where is the line on "defending myself"?

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 9182573)

For what it is worth we all live at the mercy of others. If someone wanted you dead you would be dead and there is nothing you could do about it.

Originally Posted by HonestChieffan (Post 9182578)

I believe if I remember the wording in Mo, that if you feel you are in imminent danger of bodily harm, you can use lethal force. Im sure thats not exactly the wording but its close.

Or if not armed you can run like the wind and hope you are quick as a bunny and get away

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9182583)

Unless you were carrying and you shot them.

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9182583)

Unless you were carrying and you shot them.

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 9182588)

9/10 you wouldn't see it coming

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 9182584)

Sorry, very poorly worded response on my part.

I'm asking which weapons are permissible for use in defending yourself. And which weapons are under restriction.

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 9182575)

I'm just curious if we all agree that there is not an unrestricted right to "bear arms". Or if anyone believes that there is no restriction that is constitutional, in their view.