ChiefsPlanet
Page 12 of 22 « First 2891011 12 13141516 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft Well, We Probably Should Have a Brian Orakpo Thread... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=196400)

'Hamas' Jenkins 11-10-2008 12:43 AM
I'm all for spending a good portion of our picks on linemen...in the 2nd-fifth round where they will have appropriate value for the position they play.

Tribal Warfare 11-10-2008 12:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5206776)
That's just as ignorant as drafting solely for need.

If you have a guard with a 100 grade and a DE with a 98 grade and you are picking the top five and you take the guard your entire family should be executed for the evolutionary security of the gene pool.


Yep, **** the BPA it's need time.

'Hamas' Jenkins 11-10-2008 12:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5206777)
There's generally only about 5 positions that should even be considered for top 5 picks unless some safety is a freak of nature or something like that, but no Guard is never given that exception same for RB and TE in my personal opinion.
WR, LT, 3-Tech, QB, and RDE are it for me.

I don't think that CB, RB, or Safety warrant top five picks unless you are picking Barry Sanders or a Champ Bailey type freak (and Vontae Davis isn't that, IMO).

'Hamas' Jenkins 11-10-2008 12:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 5206779)
Yep, **** the BPA it's need time.
It's almost like you haven't read an entire word I've said in this thread.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...ts/feckoff.gif

Mecca 11-10-2008 12:45 AM
Um best player has general rules that you play by...you don't take interior offensive lineman with top 10 picks.

mylittlepony 11-10-2008 12:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5206769)
The Lions picking ahead of us is why we're having this convo we're assuming they're going QB.
Oh yeah right. Im more saying in the second round and beyond. Sorry about that.

Mecca 11-10-2008 12:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5206781)
WR, LT, 3-Tech, QB, and RDE are it for me.

I don't think that CB, RB, or Safety warrant top five picks unless you are picking Barry Sanders or a Champ Bailey type freak (and Vontae Davis isn't that, IMO).
Oh and LBs are never worth top 10 picks either unless it's a 3-4 rusher which is like taking a DE.

Tribal Warfare 11-10-2008 12:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5206783)
Um best player has general rules that you play by...you don't take interior offensive lineman with top 10 picks.
If one is like Will Shields or John Hannah badass mothe****er in pads. I'd pull the trigger.

'Hamas' Jenkins 11-10-2008 12:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5206787)
Oh and LBs are never worth top 10 picks either unless it's a 3-4 rusher which is like taking a DE.
I think 8-10 is ok for an LB. I liked the Rivers pick by Cincy @ 9-10, for one.

Mecca 11-10-2008 12:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mylittlepony (Post 5206786)
Oh yeah right. Im more saying in the second round and beyond. Sorry about that.
I wouldn't worry to much, most teams aren't as OL obsessed as the Chiefs fan base is, and after that giant run in the 1st round last year most teams won't use a top pick on a OL 2 years in a row.

'Hamas' Jenkins 11-10-2008 12:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 5206789)
If one is like Will Shields or John Hannah badass mothe****er in pads. I'd pull the trigger.
It's obvious to me that Tribal Warfare just doesn't understand what the draft is all about.

Mecca 11-10-2008 12:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5206790)
I think 8-10 is ok for an LB. I liked the Rivers pick by Cincy @ 9, for one.
I love Keith Rivers but for him to be worth his pick he has to make 8 pro bowls he basically has to be Keith Bulluck or Derrick Brooks.

I wouldn't put it past him but he has to so significantly overperform nearly everyone else at his position.

Tribal Warfare 11-10-2008 12:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5206782)
It's almost like you haven't read an entire word I've said in this thread.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...ts/feckoff.gif
Same here, I said if it's at another position pick him but if it's at OL like we've been discussing I'd grab him.

Mecca 11-10-2008 12:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5206792)
It's obvious to me that Tribal Warfare just doesn't understand what the draft is all about.
His argument is almost as bad as the one the other day...

"if you take a Qb and he sucks he's done you got nothing"

"atleast if your OT sucks you can move him to guard like Robert Gallery"

I swear I hate that argument with such a passion, it is the most fearful draft strategy I have ever heard.

Tribal Warfare 11-10-2008 12:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5206792)
It's obvious to me that Tribal Warfare just doesn't understand what the draft is all about.


Look at will Shields draft class, are you telling me he wouldn't validate a top 10 pick.?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:57 AM.
Page 12 of 22 « First 2891011 12 13141516 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.