Hopefully, after the draft, we won need to start a thread on if we should have drafted Geno over Joeckel.

Considering they weren't in the same draft that would require some serious work to pull off.

YES YES YES. Damn carl!

Flacco doesn't develop into the guy we've been watching if he plays for the Chiefs. Simple as that.

yeah, there is no excuse anymore for advocating for a positional player over a QB on the basis of 'risk' or 'value'....

we have lived that mistake...

drafting a LT would be proof you just don't give a shit

4321

Until we find one, our draft philosophy with our first pick in every single draft should be "Best QB available."

That's true in '13, obviously. But if Geno (let's say Dorsey/Reid believe he's the top QB for the sake of argument) doesn't flash in year one, the above philosophy should apply to the '14 draft, too. And on, and on, and on.

Gone are the days of total patience. No flash? Keep trying to add viable talent to the position. Concerns arise (Geno shows signs of __ concern)? Keep trying to add viable talent to the position.

And we accomplish this through the draft.

I have more sympathy for these type of threads if you actually call for the player in the draft thread.

Sadly, you are probably right. Our coaches at the time would never have given him a legitimate opportunity to play.

This bump underscores the need to draft Geno.

That is all.

But...but, there are no good qbs in this draft. The Chiefs should not take the risk in drafting one with the first pick overall.


He'd be good for the faid at #3 though :facepalm:

Personally, I think the Ravens would have taken Dorsey over Flacco back then. Hindsight is 20/20.

We passed on both Rodgers and Flacco..... :facepalm:


This calls for an old school Damnit Carl!

Our coaches would have completely wasted Flacco's talent.

A month ago, people here would not have traded the first this year for him. :doh!:

ROFLMAO.