Really it sounds like you didn't watch the game with comments like this.

The Pats had a season-high 242 yards in the first half. They scored 13 points.

They also left 3 points on the field because they went for it on fourth down trying to get 7 and the line let the rush through in two seconds.

It's not like Cassel was throwing picks.

I don't think it's flip-flopping.

I, for instance, think that Sanchez is going to develop into a top 5 QB in this league, and I still have concerns about Cassel.

But I'm not going to dwell on what might (should) have been.

I'm going to move on and hope like hell that Cassel can prove me wrong about his potential.

We are stuck with him, like it or not, and I don't.

But hell, Ive been down this road so many times I've just learned to roll with it, and I'm sure that's what TC is doing.

Cassel had to go be tempted by Satan in the desert.

People still defending Sanchez and Stafford.... Wow.

You can't talk QB philosophy on this board without someone bringing Cassel/Sanchez in to the whole thing. And nine times out of ten, it's going to be the same crowd that has been running like roaches to crackers, to get there first and fast, to make sure you understand that Cassel was the best choice for the Chiefs for the 500th ****ing time.
Didn't you and I discuss this very topic a few weeks ago? Didn't you tell me I should take the high road?
Since then, I've done nothing but acknowledge that he is in fact the Chiefs quarterback, I hope he does well, and I've laid out a minimum of an expectation of five measly, Vegas-odds wins from the guy.
And has it changed a ****ing thing in this Ass Zoo?
No. No it has not.

I, unlike you, don't believe that Cassel CAN'T become a Top 5. LIKE You however, I believe that Sanchez has a better chance at becoming a Top 5 based on the criteria and skill set that we've discussed five billion times before. And I'm willing to bet a lifetime IP ban against anyone who wants to step up against me and say that I'm wrong.

That doesn't however mean that I want Cassel, or more importantly( MOST important as a matter of fact )the Chiefs TO LOSE.

Some people apparently can not grasp this.

C'mon, this post is hilarious.

Jewish? Hebrew? Jesus? Savior?

PLAY ME OFF KEYBOARD CAT!

http://images.theage.com.au/ftage/ff..._470x353,0.jpg

LMAO

What the **** are all these words? This thread WAS about Cassel and has stayed about Cassel. Who is running to talk about Sanchez in this thread? People are arguing that blaming that loss to the Jets on Cassel is absolutely absurd, and that he did indeed come through in the clutch, which is what franchise QBs do.

I just reread your ramblings halfway through typing this, and honestly, what the **** are you on? Do you EVER make any kind of sense?

Actually, this post above brought Sanchez into the discussion.

That's chiefscafan. Does he really count? Besides, there are maybe 5 posts out of 175 in this thread that mention Sanchez. This thread is about Cassel as much as RoR wishes it was about Sanchez.

I haven't read this entire thread, so I have no idea what you're talking about with the flip-flopping. I'll soon discover, though, as I read more.

This aside, your post does a nice job of articulating my thoughts on the QB situation with the Chefs.

You're just trying to feed chiefsca's insecurities, aren't you?

If you can't understand the post, then you are a ****ing reeruned child and ignore is where you belong.

I joined the planet on it's second or third day of existence (84th member to join, I believe), and in all that time I have never put anyon on ignore.

You have a greater tolerance for dickbags than I do.