The fact that you need to be told you aren't a doucherocket speaks volumes.


And you think I'm a dumbass why do you reply to just about all my comments? Learn to use the ignore or go home.

ROFL Yes, I'm laughing AT you...

It is my job to point out dumbassery when I see it.

I have never used ignore, and don't intend to.

And if you are so ****ing stupid that you think I'm seeking the board's approval, then you are even more ****ing stupid than I already thought you were.

That post wasn't seeking approval.
I'm an asshole and don't have any other illusions about myself.

You, on the other hand.....

Kinda hard to discuss how good or bad Dirty Sanchez is when he's yet to take a real snap. How he looks in camp is irrelevant.

ROFL

WTF?

LMAO.

Leave for a little bit, and this is what happens. Anyway, OTW provided all the evidence needed.

This belief that Pioli is a drafting god is pretty humorous. The Brady draft, without winning the ****ing world lottery in the 6th, was a complete ****ing disaster.

But, other than that, Pioli's perfect.

Billay is a colossal ****ing moron. Absurdly criticizing milkman's posting only ranks in the top 20 of stupid shit he's said, amazingly enough.

First, I do not believe this team is devoid of talent. In fact, guys like Dj and Dorsey are hugely talented.

I think some of that will show with better coaching.

I also believe that the QB position is the most important on the team. I do not believe it is a must to have a HOF QB to win games, but you need a steady dependable consistent guy.

I believe that one of the biggest, if not the biggest reason for the Chiefs horrible record over the last two years is the inconsistency at QB.

Not only the inconsistency in the QB playing, but the actual starter from week to week changed as much as any team in the league it seemed.

Talent is only one aspect of production. Then, you have the system, you have the coaching, and you have veteran leadership to help the players grow and learn.

The guys you mentioned will do as much to build this team as anyone. Because they are the examples to show the guys how to do it.

They are the leaders who will hold the younger players accountable.

Their 'imprint' on the development of the young players on this team will be felt for years to come.

I am all for going young. But, when things are as bad as they are for this franchise, you need to start working things in the right direction because losing becomes habitual.

And, there is a reason so many top draft picks at QB fail.... they go to sucka$$ teams with a losing culture and lesser talent.

Cassel will be part of the leadership that rights the ship... NO rookie can do that.... not even Sanchez.

The big thing you ignore here is that the Colts drafting Manning.... a multi year starter and very successful player.

The Chargers drafted Rivers, a multi year starter and very successful player.

The Giants drafter the other Manning, again, a mult year starter and successful player.

Other than maybe Peyton, these guys were not on teams with clearly superior talent to those around them.

And, none of them played in the weak Pac 10 against substandard competition.

Other than Stafford, there was no QB in this draft that would compare to those three coming out of college.

That is the difference.

But there was no guarantee that they would. They may have... they may have picked up a Garcia type of player to hold them over until a better QB prospect was available, if they didn't like Sanchez.

We don't know what they might have done if they hadn't traded for Cassel, but the fact is, we know that Sanchez was ther at #3, and the perception will be that we passed on Sanchez in favor of trading for Cassel.

It may not be the reality of the situation.
We will never know.

But as they say, perception is reality.

That's unfair. Some would just like a little longer college resume.

Not to mention, if my team is going to draft a QB top five... I want him to be a prototypical game changing type of QB. I want a strong arm.

Stafford would have been great, strong arm and a long resume proving that he can overcome difficulties.

Sanchez struggled to win the starting job and then was on a team vastly superior to those other teams in the Pac 10.

Sanchez may turn out to be great, but if I am picking a QB top five, I want more.

I think Cassel has similar physical ability, plus a year starting in the NFL, a history of persistence to overcome adversity, and a proven work ethic.

All at a lesser draft and paycheck price. (given that their contracts are similar now, and Sahnchez would have gotten more at the #3 spot)

I understand, but I think it is false to assume that the Chiefs front office had Sanchez rated as high as Mecca does.

Matt Stafford looking pretty dam good for Detroit against Atlanta.

Absolutely true. And, if Sanchez bombs... won't the Jets fans regret not paying more attention to the 'questions'?

Anytime a pick fails, fan lament the choice...even if the majority of them agreed at the time.