![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
does indeed seem to be the case.....and let me say once for old times sake: **** you Carl |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Simply because that is the order that we have the rights for the specific players. If we hold player rights for 5 years, this is the final year that we own Halis rights and if we lost him, where would our pass rush be? Remember 2008 when we had 10 sacks? |
Judging by New England's track record I wonder how they will regard Flowers. New England sort of let its defensive backs walk.
|
Quote:
I think they ****ed up with Asante Samuel, but I don't see Clark Pioli letting Flowers walk like NE did Asante... I think NE felt they could do so and they still had enough talent to sustain a playoff caliber defense without him, this is a different situation. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Flowers is 24 As I pointed out, we own his rights another 3 years unless a new CBA is agreed upon...Hali only has one more year and Bowe has 2...again, using the current structure. There is no way Flowers is going anywhere for the next 6 years or more. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We can place tenders on either player of a 1st and 3rd or franchise either to keep them once their contract expires up until after their 6th year in the league. That is why DJ is still a Chief and he didnt hit the open market after his rookie deal expired. |
Quote:
Besides Samuel, I dont really remember the letting any good corners walk. The only way I see Flowers not being a Chief in three years is if we get at least a 1st and 3rd for him and we sign everyone else, which I would view as a mistake because players like Flowers are extremely rare and almost irreplaceable. If we lose him in the next couple years, it sets this defense back a couple steps. |
That is a pretty cheap contract. I was hoping Pioli would overspend like he did with Derrick Johnson.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.