No, he didn't "perform" all year.

He sucked ass for most of teh first half of the season.

I jumped on his bandwagon when I saw him actually doing things an NFL QB should be doing, i.e., using good mechanics when dropping back and making throws, stepping up in the pocket, making actual reads and calling audibles.

While others have returned to bashing him, which is their right, because he did regress, I remain on his bandwagon, because I saw those things for the first time in his career, and I believe that he finally has the building blocks to grow into a consistent NFL QB that you can win with.

1. QB

2. QB

3. QB


It'll never happen, though. We're stuck with Cassel for at least another year or two, maybe more.

Knowing that, I go NT, ILB, OLB, WR, in no particular order, with C and OT not far behind.

Using your most valuable pick on a guy who may not be any better than the guy you already have isn't a good way to address any of the glaring deficiencies that surround that guy.

LOL, and then there's this.

This draft is ****in staaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaacked at WR. Are you going to draft a OL with the 1st pick? Nope. So what other position on offense besides OL and WR do the Chiefs need help with where using a 1st round pick on wouldn't be completely reeruned? QB.

Well, we're not talking about the most important position on the team, are we?

No coincidence that 6 of the remaining 8 teams are QB'd by 1st round picks.

Or we could just sit around for another decade hoping that our 7th round career backup becomes an elite QB, just because Tom Brady did.

Tom Brady did it his first year as a starter and here we are 3 years later praising a QB who didn't take a 16-0 team to the playoffs :deevee:

When a draft is stacked at WR, you take a WR if you need a WR. We could get a WR that might go top 10 in other years because there are so many studs.

That wasnt my point... We can look else where with the 1st pick and get a WR in the 2nd/3rd and still end up with a solid WR to lineup opposite of Bowe. With so many people rising the draft charts WR's like Baldwin might not be looking at a 1st round selection anymore.

Head Coach
O cordinator
QB
3 good WR's

You have to look at the value of the slot. If there is a WR that would normally grade out as a top 10 pick, you take him if he falls to you. Getting a high first talent with a low first is a better deal than getting a high second talent with a late second. Compare the draft value charts if you want to see how big that difference is.

Top priority should be NT. That doesn't really mean we should draft one in the first round, but they need to have one targeted. A true nose tackle will elevate the whole defense. Vrabel is about to retire(if i had to guess) and Im not sold on belcher in pass coverage, so linebacker is a need, inside and out. There is a need at Wr and interior O-line. Need a center who doesn't have trouble maintaining weight down the stretch. A more physical center turns this run game up to 11. Less finesse and more smashmouth please. Also a playmaking wide receiver who isn't too small to play every down.

Address these needs and we could compete and defend the AFCW crown.

Why limit their first pick in the draft to offense? And then, why exclude 7/12ths of the possible positions that one might select on offense? If you have a more sensible question for me, I'd be glad to entertain it.

I'm not limiting anything.... Holy reading comprehension.

So you would take a player in the 1st that you could take later in the draft? Ya... Thats about the most reeruned thing I've ever heard of. That's something Josh McDaniels does.