ChiefsPlanet
Page 12 of 21 « First 2891011 12 13141516 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs A Change Gonna Come (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=264872)

Reerun_KC 10-09-2012 12:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8995781)
He really has done nothing in the NFL. He's this year's Tyler Palko. People only say good things about him because he's not Cassel.
/thread

qabbaan 10-09-2012 12:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8995779)
Cassel gives us the best chance to get rid of Crennel and Pioli.

Any support for Quinn is direct support for Pioli and Crennel.
Eh.

If Quinn comes in and he also sucks, it's a team in disarray and lacking the personnel to succeed. Reflects poorly on the GM.

If Cassel is left out on the field to founder, reflects poorly on the GM.

If Quinn comes in and succeeds, the question is why the hell couldn't they see this and why do they insist on playing their inferior hand picked player? Reflects poorly on the GM.

Reerun_KC 10-09-2012 12:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by frazod (Post 8995790)
Works for me. There's no way I could do worse job than the last two.
That way I could hate you even more than I do now...

:thumb:





well not really... For a MUron, you alright...

Hammock Parties 10-09-2012 12:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 8995786)
Doubt it. Division games are almost always close.
Not under this regime.

We've been blown out in six division games since 2009.

Deberg_1990 10-09-2012 12:17 PM
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/dawGJDtHlcs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

DaWolf 10-09-2012 12:19 PM
It's funny how everyone wants DeCosta now (and he ain't leaving that job in BMore, BTW). He's the new Pioli. Ozzie Newsome ain't walking through that door with him. DeCosta may end up being a good GM, but that's what people thought about Pioli. Let's not forget about George Kokinis, Ozzie's other prime pupil in pro-personnel.

Hell, he may turn out to be good, but after this whole Pioli thing, whoever replaces him will have to prove it to me first. Clark would need to think outside the box rather than trying to replicate the Pats or Ravens by bringing in one of their longtime execs. I'd almost rather have a fresh face in the front office than someone who has been sitting in another organization for so long, IE what the Colts did with Grigson...

WV 10-09-2012 12:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 8994987)
@BillMaas: I assure you that Clark Hunt has taken the Bull by the horns and is addressing the Chiefs 2 biggest concerns
Briging in FA Olineman and WR's....those two things are hampering the maturation of Cassel. LMAO

BigRock 10-09-2012 12:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8995393)
cHunt didn't do his part because anyone with a ****ing brain would have looked at New England's draft and free agency record during his time there and figured out all of the success had to do with Tom Brady and Bill Belichick, not Pioli.

Clark failed miserably and did not perform proper due diligence.
This just in: Scott Pioli didn't make the decisions in New England. He didn't pick the players they drafted. He signed the guys Belichick wanted. Trying to analyze their personnel decisions as a reflection on Pioli was, and is, a useless endeavour.

And you know who else is in that exact same spot? Doesn't make the decisions, works for a team where you know exactly who gets credit for the success? Eric DeCosta.

You're either on board with that profile or you aren't.

Sorter 10-09-2012 12:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8995801)
Not under this regime.

We've been blown out in six division games since 2009.
I literally just posted that in the past 3 years, we have split with every team in the division with the exception of Oakland and SD, once in 2009 and once in 2010.

We literally split nearly every division game for the past 3 years with a worse team and probably worse QB and you think that we have no chance of winning a division game?

Pasta Little Brioni 10-09-2012 12:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 8995803)
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/dawGJDtHlcs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
LMAO

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/RaYgGSHJ5hM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

CaliforniaChief 10-09-2012 12:24 PM
I'm fairly certain a primo "name" guy isn't going to want to step into this shit storm.

Not that we can't get a good GM, I'm just saying it's probably gonna be one of those WTF names when we first hear it.

DaneMcCloud 10-09-2012 12:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Dog (Post 8995776)
Wrong. Head to head is not a NFL draft tiebreaker.
TIE-BREAKING PROCEDURE FOR SELECTION MEETING

  1. Clubs not participating in the playoffs shall select in the first through 20th positions in reverse standings order.
  2. The Super Bowl winner is last and Super Bowl loser is next-to-last.
  3. The losers of the Conference Championship games shall select 29th and 30th based on won-lost-tied percentage.
  4. The losers of the Divisional playoff games shall select 25th through 28th based on won-lost-tied percentage.
  5. The losers of the Wild Card games shall select 21st through 24th based on won-lost-tied percentage.
If ties exist in any grouping except (2) above, such ties shall be broken by strength-of-schedule. If any ties cannot be broken by strength-of-schedule, the divisional or conference tie-breakers, if applicable, shall be applied. Any ties that still exist shall be broken by a coin flip.


--------------------


So, if the Browns beat the Chiefs and both teams finish 1-15, the number one overall draft choice would be determined by Strength of Schedule. In that case, the Browns would probably choose first because their schedule includes the NFC East.

DaneMcCloud 10-09-2012 12:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 8995810)
This just in: Scott Pioli didn't make the decisions in New England. He didn't pick the players they drafted. He signed the guys Belichick wanted. Trying to analyze their personnel decisions as a reflection on Pioli was, and is, a useless endeavour.

And you know who else is in that exact same spot? Doesn't make the decisions, works for a team where you know exactly who gets credit for the success? Eric DeCosta.

You're either on board with that profile or you aren't.
I'll take the guy that has worked his way up in one of the best organizations in all of football regarding free agency, the draft and the hiring of coaches over the guy that rode the coattails of his father-in-law and his cronies.

ChiefsCountry 10-09-2012 12:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 8995810)
And you know who else is in that exact same spot? Doesn't make the decisions, works for a team where you know exactly who gets credit for the success? Eric DeCosta.
Different paths to the top. DeCosta was a scout, then he was Director of College Scouting then Director of Player Personal.

Pasta Little Brioni 10-09-2012 12:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 8995810)
This just in: Scott Pioli didn't make the decisions in New England. He didn't pick the players they drafted. He signed the guys Belichick wanted. Trying to analyze their personnel decisions as a reflection on Pioli was, and is, a useless endeavour.

And you know who else is in that exact same spot? Doesn't make the decisions, works for a team where you know exactly who gets credit for the success? Eric DeCosta.

You're either on board with that profile or you aren't.
Thanks for the internet GM job offers Ozzie!!!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:55 AM.
Page 12 of 21 « First 2891011 12 13141516 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.