ChiefsPlanet - Poop New Jersey kids randomly knock people out.

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

New Jersey kids randomly knock people out. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=278501)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10183323)

You want to lead that charge?...

Remotely? sure.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10183323)

You want to lead that charge?...

hell no. get an entire platoon of them and drop them into Afghanistan.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 10183326)

hell no. get an entire platoon of them and drop them into Afghanistan.

I doubt their stealth methods work there...

tell them there are lots of unsuspecting people there for them to knockout.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 10181709)

No. Mike Tyson didn't walk down the street with a bunch of kids, and randomly knock people out.
Mike Tyson, street fought with dudes. For money, much the same as dog fighting.
This is completely different.

I'm a Tyson freak. always have been. love his show by the way. I think the dude has really grown up....changed.
anyways....I thought this article was pretty good.

http://nymag.com/news/features/mike-tyson-2013-10/

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 10182078)

Making poor people more poor usually helps matters.

Let's give them money for nothing that will change them, good intentions make me feel good.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10183329)

I doubt their stealth methods work there...

I would love to see these kids try and punch a Jihadi in the face. Heh.

Inferior weapons? Yes. Inferior technology? Yes. Pussies? Far from it.

easy to be 'tough' when the thing your punching doesn't punch back.

they're bad asses.

These should be punished as hate crimes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fish (Post 10181952)

I don't hate the idea. But what effect are you expecting out of that scenario? Who pays the bill if you prosecute the parent? You think these kids' parents can afford to pay damages? Then what? Take the parents to jail? So the taxpayer is paying to jail the parent, and provide care for the child. We can hold the parents to whatever responsibility level you can dream up. The problem is that it wouldn't do any good and would likely cause even more of a strain on the system.

ok, think about it this way: if there is even a possibility of prosecuting the parents and holding them liable for their kid's actions, I think that will force many parents (who have kids who are out of control) to become better parents, that is, to not just kick the can down the street. They have to get involved or there is the possibility that if little Johnny kills someone drunk driving that they may in fact, be held responsible.

That's all I'm saying. Make it an option for the prosecution to go after said parents. I'm not saying it will work every time. But what I am saying is that in a case-by-case basis, if the prosecution has this option, it may indeed force parents to be way more active and responsible for their kid's lives.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 10183642)

ok, think about it this way: if there is even a possibility of prosecuting the parents and holding them liable for their kid's actions, I think that will force many parents (who have kids who are out of control) to become better parents, that is, to not just kick the can down the street. They have to get involved or there is the possibility that if little Johnny kills someone drunk driving that they may in fact, be held responsible.

That's all I'm saying. Make it an option for the prosecution to go after said parents. I'm not saying it will work every time. But what I am saying is that in a case-by-case basis, if the prosecution has this option, it may indeed force parents to be way more active and responsible for their kid's lives.

LMAO

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 10183650)

LMAO

again, if you have a better suggestion I'm all ears...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 10183657)

again, if you have a better suggestion I'm all ears...

Keep doing what we are doing...

The 2012 National Crime Victimization Survey by the Bureau of Justice Statistics found that 26 of every 1,000 people experienced violent crime. 1993 80 of every 1,000 people reported being victims of violent crime. The homicide rate declined 48% from 1993 to 2011.

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 10183670)

but crimes like Columbine are happening more and more with younger and younger kids. It's at a whole different level now. 20-30 years ago you didn't hear about kids taking guns to schools and shooting everyone up.