Originally Posted by billay (Post 6896408)

Pollard ****ing sucked here it's amazing how people still defend him and Brodie ****ing Crolye. Why aren't you drool tards begging to bring back Herm while your at it?

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6896586)

says the guy who was the boards biggest Mike Brown fan and biggest Brandon Carr hater...

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6895587)

Holy shit.

You really want to imply that Johnson's gone because of his PLAY?

Had LJ stayed out of trouble, Charles would have never saw the field. ****, he was INACTIVE for a game, that's how much the staff thought of him.

Just like Wade Smith not seeing the field had Goff not gotten hurt.

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6896631)

At the very least, Carr has been a respectable #2 CB, and he's an ascending player.

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6896591)

Mike Brown was one of the best safeties in the league for years. Croyle, Pollard, and Carr haven't done shit. Whats your point?

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6896682)

What Mike Brown did before he joined the Chiefs is irrelevant to the discussion of what he was doing as a Chief.

Mike Brown sucked ass last year.

I'm talking giant, fat lady at the circus ass, suck.

It took you nearly a full season to wrap your itty bitty brain around that fact.

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6896685)

How is what Brown did before joining the Chiefs irrelevant? You realize I based what he brought to the team based upon his years in Chicago and watching him play every week as a Husker?

Where as alot of you just sit there with your thumb up your ass and say Pollard, Croyle, ect. will be good because they've made a few good plays and are young.

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6896691)

You misunderstand me.

I didn't say what he did as a Bear was irrelevant before he signed, and at the time of the signing.

What he did as a Bear was irrelevant to his play as a Chief as the season progressed.

You couldn't grasp the concept that he sucked.

It took you the better part of the season to grasp the concept that he sucked as a Chief.

You were too blinded by your Husker homerism to admit that he sucked.

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6896699)

No I knew he wasn't as good as he used to be however I've always said and will say he wasn't the only problem with the defense. Do you really think Bernard Pollard would have made a difference?


And theres no Huskerhomerism he was a play making safety in this league wether he went to Nebraska or Texas. I just happend to watch him every week in college. You didn't see me begging for the Chiefs to draft Suh or Asante did you?

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6896708)

Actually, where do you see me talking about Pollard in this thread.

Do I think he was better than the crap we had?

Yeah.

Do I lament the fact that he's gone?

No.

He's an average player, who's a little better than some here make him out to be, worse than others make him out to be.

But he was never going to be any kind of difference making player in this defense.

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6896711)

Fair enough but you know some on here are pretending he's an obvious pro bowl talent and using it as yet another excuse to bash Pioli.

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6896711)

Fair enough but you know some on here are pretending he's an obvious pro bowl talent and using it as yet another excuse to bash Pioli.

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6896721)

The fact that he is a better player than the crap we lined up at safety last year, regardless of his actual talent level is reason enough to bash Pioli.