Your argument doesn't even support your position. If your theory is that it's so important to draft a QB in the 1st round, why are you wasting a 2nd and a 3rd on QB too?

Seriously, there's a reason no modern era team has ever drafted QB, QB, QB in the first 3 rounds of the draft and it's not because no one, before you, was ever smart enough to think of it.

Drafting away from a draft's strength, when you have needs at those areas of strength, doesn't sound like a brilliant idea to me either. Tyson Jackson disagrees with me though so you've got that going for you.

I'm going to go out on a limb that his 1. 2. 3. comment with QB listed next to them was to emphasize the importance of a QB and not him thinking we should draft a QB 3 rounds in a row.

Ummm...I believe you've missed the point of the hyperbole. What are the three most important factors in real estate?

1. Location
2. Location
3. Location

What position do we need?

1. Quarterback
2. Quarterback
3. Quarterback

Did you not discount the idea of drafting OL or WR with the first round pick? I think you did.

Ya. Lets draft someone like Baldwin just because before guys like Blackmon busted on the scene he was targeted to go top 15. Now he's projected as maybe bouncing to the second. But by all means lets take him at 21 instead of perhaps trading down and taking him later.

You're a dumbass and can't comprehend what you read.

:LOL: OK. Hit me up when you figure out how to dumb your question down enough for it to make sense.

Perhaps he can't comprehend what he read in your post because you're a dumbass that writes poorly.

I already did in previous posts generated at dumbasses in your IQ range.

Or perhaps he decided to not read the entire conversation and only came in at the end to look like a moron just like you.

No.

It's you.

You haven't yet clearly made a point.

I believe I have. It's posted in this thread. If you can't find it might I suggest visiting your local Wally-world for an eye check?

I understood all along that OTW58 was using hyperbole. I honestly don't understand the point you were trying to make.

Here you go bud. I'll quote it for ya.

This was all directed at someone shooting down the idea of going after a QB in round 1. That's why I was only focused on the offensive side of the ball. We can afford to pick a QB in the first, if one falls or we trade up for one, and still walk away with every single need. There are still going to be WR's when our second or third pick comes around, because there are so many of them, that will be more than serviceable opposite Bowe. No one is picking OL in the first because there are far more important and game changing positions in football...

All caught up now?