ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs Woman behind the Redskins name change says the Chiefs should be on guard

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

Woman behind the Redskins name change says the Chiefs should be on guard (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=284628)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xanathol (Post 10716601)

Need is Redskin to anyone with an IQ over 3.

Your and idiot.

Ironically if they were called the KC Casinos it wouldn't be an issue.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 10716457)

Its hilarious that you are so concerned about my 1/128....

Not concerned at all but you're the reerun that has stated more than once, "I'm Native American and I'm not offended so don't change the Redskins name since I'm Native American and I'm not offended."

Chiefs, Blackhawks, Seminoles, Indians (their logo is racist) are not racist. .redskins is / topic.

I think we should ban je ne sais quois as it mascotizes the French as a people who can't explain what the **** they're talking about.

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 10716427)

Proactive steps the Chiefs could take (and maybe should take) to head off the lawsuit:

1) Stop playing the tomahawk chop song, stop selling tomahawks in the stadium, and play over it any time the fans start a tomahawk chop on their own.

This pisses me off so much. Oh no we musn't offend the sanctity of the tomahawk which is a sacred and revered instrument.

It's a ROCK. Tied to a STICK. With the purpose of BASHING IN SKULLS.

*I'm Blackfoot. They used longbows.

In the case of the Indians and Chiefs, if they would simply say they don't want to be associated with a franchise that hasn't won anything in 43 years then they may have an argument.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 10716767)

Let me guess, you're 1/286 Blackfoot.

If there ever must be a name change for our team, may it be the Kansas City Perennial Superbowl Champs.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thatguy (Post 10716761)

Chiefs, Blackhawks, Seminoles, Indians (their logo is racist) are not racist. .redskins is / topic.

You're right, Blackhawks isn't.

Quote:

During World War I, McLaughlin had served as a commander in the 333rd Machine Gun Battalion of the 86th Division of the U.S. Army. Members of his division called themselves Black Hawks in honor of the Sauk Indian chief who sided with the British in the War of 1812. Surely, the Major felt, it would be a fitting name for the newest entry into the National Hockey League.

http://blackhawks.nhl.com/club/page.htm?id=46778

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 10716046)

Once you give in to the offended crowd, they find more to be offended by. Who knew?*

*Well, other than everyone who's ever studied history

Bullies come in all shapes and sizes, giving in to them doesn't make them less of a bully. This lady is just another leech trying to cash in on by making life miserable for other people.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Namor40 (Post 10716781)

Bullies come in all shapes and sizes, giving in to them doesn't make them less of a bully. This **** is just another leech trying to cash in on by making life miserable for other people.

FYP

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andoverer (Post 10716775)

If there ever must be a name change for our team, may it be the Kansas City Pussified ****face Chumps

FYP

Can we offer them half of Raytown to back off?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 10716230)

There's a huge difference between using a Native American name and using a racist Native American term...

Both "Chiefs" and "Redskins" are currently considered offensive, according to this native American woman. There's no difference at all.

Quote:

Originally Posted by soopamanluva (Post 10716234)

How do you call someone a name they don't want to be called out of respect? Strictly referring to "redskins".

I assume that's rhetorical, and intended to stir up emotions in opposition to the facts. You can't possibly be stupid enough to ask that question any other way.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Basileus777 (Post 10716294)

The name "chiefs" is completely neutral, it need not even be specific to Indians. It's not a slur like Redskins. And you'd have a hard time trying to make the case that the team's logo or use of the word arrowhead is offensive.

The name "Chiefs" is no more neutral than "Redskins" or "History".

Quote:

Originally Posted by blaise (Post 10716361)

Nothing will come of it because there will basically be no public support. Almost no one will agree that Chiefs is offensive or a slur. I bet this has more to do with her wanting to keep attention on herself after the Redskins change their name. She likes being a hero for a cause.

Bitching about "Redskins" had basically no public support. They kept at it. It's what they do. It works. Just ask the homosexuals, the radical feminists, and some dead progressive politicians like (Ted Kennedy).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Dole (Post 10716522)

How the **** is Chiefs even in the same discussion as Redskins? Chief is in no way, shape or form a racial slur.

JFC, this country is just ****ed and waiting for the next Hitler to kick our pussified asses.

Take it up with the native Americans. They get to decide whether or not it's offensive, not you.

When will you people finally wake up and realize that this is just a symptom, and not the problem? When everything is political, nothing is off-limits. When you appease the freaks, they start demanding more. It's in their nature, and you enablers are a huge part of the problem.