ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Best players available after Round 1 (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=299586)

BigChiefFan 04-29-2016 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12203365)
Being a ****ing moron is certainly yours

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12203376)
**** off, Dickhead.

And there are plenty of posts in which I stated that I didn't think that Lynch would be available at #28 and that some team would trade up to get him.

Duh.

You're as worthless a poster today as when you first joined.

Gee, another attack from Dane when he doesn't agree with someone. Great coping skills, needle dick. **** your Momma, princess. I'm done seeing you attack others constantly and I refuse to let you ruin this place for me. You're an asshole and most see it, when you show your ass on a frequent basis. You aren't worth my time, you miserable prick.

DaneMcCloud 04-29-2016 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 12203379)
We take X-Howard and then use our extras to trade up a few slots.

Then take McGovern if (and I'm guessing there will be a run on G's in round 2.)

I'd rather see Alexander and Whitehair in that type of scenario but it's possible both are gone where the Chiefs currently pick.

DaneMcCloud 04-29-2016 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 12203390)
Gee, another attack from Dane when he doesn't agree with someone. Great coping skills, needle dick. **** your Momma, princess. I'm done seeing you attack others constantly and I refuse to let you ruin this place for me. You're an asshole and most see it, when you show your ass on a frequent basis. You aren't worth my time, you miserable prick.

Wait a minute: You didn't even disagree with me, you ****ing prick. You just attacked me for making a suggestion.

And your concern for my penis and my mother are creepy, ****tard.

donkhater 04-29-2016 10:39 AM

First thing I thought when they traded down was that the Guard from K-State would be there.

BryanBusby 04-29-2016 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 12203360)
CB THEN G!

CB THEN G!

Say it with me...

No idea what's with the burning desire to take Guards so early.

It should be CB and WR. They can move up to the end of Friday and get a starting Guard with no issues.

Rausch 04-29-2016 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12203391)
I'd rather see Alexander and Whitehair in that type of scenario but it's possible both are gone where the Chiefs currently pick.

We should bookmark this.

I'll take the X and McGovern over both of those two...

Mr. Laz 04-29-2016 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by donkhater (Post 12203401)
First thing I thought when they traded down was that the Guard from K-State would be there.

I sure as hell hope they aren't aren't makes move with the focus of drafting a ****ing guard.


Cornerback ... Do you understand the words that are coming out of my mouth?

Rausch 04-29-2016 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 12203411)
No idea what's with the burning desire to take Guards so early.

It should be CB and WR. They can move up to the end of Friday and get a starting Guard with no issues.

Lower 2nd (almost 3rd) isn't taking a G early.

RunKC 04-29-2016 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 12203419)
I sure as hell hope they aren't aren't makes move with the focus of drafting a ****ing guard.


Cornerback ... Do you understand the words that are coming out of my mouth?

There will be solid cornerbacks there at 59. I seem to remember a dominant offensive line making an eighth round quarterback and undrafted running back look amazing with no wide receivers 13 years ago.

It's a boring pick but I can see why they want to do it

Rausch 04-29-2016 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12203430)
There will be solid cornerbacks there at 59. I seem to remember a dominant offensive line making an eighth round quarterback and undrafted running back look amazing with no wide receivers 13 years ago.

It's a boring pick but I can see why they want to do it

I'd prefer to take a lock and a guy that can transition between CB/FS/S.

Howard can do that. Your magazines and online rankings won't say that but he can.

Right now the X man is by far our best option at DB...

BryanBusby 04-29-2016 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 12203423)
Lower 2nd (almost 3rd) isn't taking a G early.

If you're wanting the undersized kid with trex arms from kstate, you'll have to use the top 2nd for him.

I don't see the appeal. Take Evan Boehm later and fill some bigger needs first. He would be available in the 3rd, which is where you would more like to draft trex.

The Franchise 04-29-2016 10:56 AM

Nick Martin.....mother****ers.

Rausch 04-29-2016 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 12203444)
If you're wanting the undersized kid with trex arms from kstate, you'll have to use the top 2nd for him.

I don't see the appeal. Take Evan Boehm later and fill some bigger needs first. He would be available in the 3rd, which is where you would more like to draft trex.

He can go.

I'm fine with the upside of Xavier and the McGovern...

pugsnotdrugs19 04-29-2016 10:57 AM

Take Alexander or Green at 37. Trade up and get Boyd or Shepherd from 59. Take your guard at 105.

DaneMcCloud 04-29-2016 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 12203457)
Take Alexander or Green at 37. Trade up and get Boyd or Shepherd from 59. Take your guard at 105.

This would work, too.

I've been saying Evan Boehm at guard in the 4th for a while. It'll be curious to see how it shakes out.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.