Quote:
It really goes : Mahomes>Smith>Kraperdick Hell, we even got more for Alex than we gave up. I calls it a win. |
Quote:
I didn't see it coming, not like that. Of course, I expected Haglund to take the field by mid-season, and be back to some semblance of his former self by playoffs, too... |
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Arizona Governor <a href="https://twitter.com/dougducey?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@dougducey</a> spotter wearing <a href="https://twitter.com/Nike?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Nike</a> sneakers just 2 days after pulling state incentives for the company because they announced they wouldn’t print a specific shoe. <br><br>His grandstanding and faux-outrage will cost his state jobs. <a href="https://t.co/Js1PUEjomq">pic.twitter.com/Js1PUEjomq</a></p>— Kaivan Shroff (@KaivanShroff) <a href="https://twitter.com/KaivanShroff/status/1147180391180263424?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 5, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
CK has very little to say, if ever. But the media makes him out to have all this attention that he really doesn't deserve. The guy rarely even talks. He's just living off his kneeling, something he perfected while being a unhappy benched QB with a axe to grind in SF. I never liked anything NIKE made, so them hiring CK as their spokesman seems logical to me.
|
Nike, because of America's motivated liberal snowflakes who will embrace anything anti-America and anti-President Trump, are using the Kaep tool and laughing all the way to the bank.
|
I see we’re lit the fat, goateed, middle-age white male outrage signal.....
|
Quote:
But yes, Kaep bothers me because of his hatred for this country and his hatred for our wonderful police community; he stands for a non-problem. He's an idiot and I pray I get the chance to piss on his grave (after a natural death). |
Quote:
Police killing unarmed black men? Non-problem. Giant corporation pulls shoe I wasn’t going to buy? Hold my beer. |
Quote:
No one thinks that law enforcement that results in grievous damage or death is 'no problem.' The difference arises over the nature of the problem, the specific facts of each instance, and the proper path to resolution and/or amelioration. Quote:
No one cares that a corporation pulled a product. It's the rhetoric that prompted the decision. |
Quote:
GloryDerp said it was a non-problem and I was just using his words. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Armed or not, maybe next time a cop tells them to do something they should do it. Beats being dead, right? http://i.ebayimg.com/images/i/262809...-1/s-l1000.jpg |
Quote:
And we'll let the system take care of the bad cops. Not that there are many, but we might find a few somewhere, we'll just have to look really hard and be aware that some really shitty people just want every cop who kills anybody, crucified. **** that! :popcorn: http://i.ebayimg.com/images/i/262809...-1/s-l1000.jpg |
Quote:
Why give not being an asshole a try? It's worked very well for my family... http://i.ebayimg.com/images/i/262809...-1/s-l1000.jpg |
Your argument being that cops should be able to use deadly force against minorities regardless of what crime they may have committed? Simply because they aren't 'doing what they are told'?
And you don't see how that's racist as hell? https://pics.me.me/he-shouldve-just-...u-58360361.png |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.