ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs vrabel a chief (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=203246)

RUSH 02-27-2009 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut (Post 5534018)

LOL! Hilarious

|Zach| 02-27-2009 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5534030)
I'd have no problem had they signed him as a FA.

Trading a draft pick, ANY draft pick for him is foolish.

Well if you keep plugging away every min on Chiefs Planet maybe Pioli will start listening to you and your band of merry men.

The smartest guys in the history of message board armchair draft gods.

RealSNR 02-27-2009 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut (Post 5534018)

LMAO Was just going to post that. I may have stolen it from you earlier

Chiefnj2 02-27-2009 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradyFTW! (Post 5534004)
Patriots fan here, just thought I'd stop by and give my 2 cents on Vrabel.

First off, he's one of my favorite Pats. He was a key defender on all 3 of the SB runs, and he's a high-intelligence, high-work ethic guy. He struggled a lot last year, but his shoulder was injured pretty much all season. FWIW, I don't think that Pioli would trade for him without knowing that it was going to heal fine. Assuming that, I don't think he'll come back at his 2007 level (12.5 sacks, 77 tackles, mostly in the first 2/3rds of the season), but you should expect closer to 2007 than 2008.

A lot of us had projected that Tedy Bruschi would be gone, and Vrabel would move inside to take his place. Vrabel has played quite a bit of ILB in the past (in 2005, when Bruschi had his stroke before the season, Vrabel moved inside for pretty much the whole year). I wouldn't assume that he was signed to be an OLB in a 3-4, because he's definitely a hybrid and can play either way. He's also by all accounts a leader in the locker room. I've been following the Chiefs a bit since Pioli left, and I do want him to succeed in KC (just not at the Pats' expense ;P). Anyways, depending on what you guys actually gave up, I think that it could be a good move. If I had to guess, I'd say that it was either a 3rd/4th rounder, or maybe part of a larger trade with some swaps in draft position.

I'm not psyched with the move as a Pats fan in of itself. I like Vrabel, and think that he could continue to contribute for us. I'm encouraged, though, in that I think that it's either setting up a big move or it means that our young guys are progressing well.

If it is a 3rd or 4th rounder it will become apparent really quickly as to who was the male and who was the female in the Belichick/Pioli relationship.

RippedmyFlesh 02-27-2009 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5533795)
You don't trade draft picks for a 34 year old, when you had one on the roster with comparable skills and let him walk.

Comparable skills?
Donnie didnt do shit except collect checks.
Vrabel had 2 sacks against kc last year.
Edwards was one of the worst signings we did. He was washed up which is why SD let him walk.

Barret 02-27-2009 02:07 PM

Well could this be a precursor to who we are drafting. All of you are saying he provides leadership value. Also wasn't either Pioli or Haley quoted as saying they need to work on defense.

I don't advocate this but does this mean we go with Aaron Curry the OLB from Wake?

sedated 02-27-2009 02:07 PM

the Patriots have never had success picking up a thought-to-be-washed-up veteran

blueballs 02-27-2009 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut (Post 5534018)

HA

rolstrol 02-27-2009 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5534030)
I'd have no problem had they signed him as a FA.

Trading a draft pick, ANY draft pick for him is foolish.

whats the pick??

if its a 5th, 6th or 7th is it that big of a deal?

DaWolf 02-27-2009 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5533975)
This move is great for one thing alone:

Leadership.

Some of you want to field a team with 25 year olds everywhere who never won shit.

Vrabel is going to be a good mentor to this defense to teach them how to WIN.

This. I'll also throw in another reason I don't mind this move: accountability. You bring in a guy who has had that much success and install him on the defense, you young uns better be prepared to not **** up, because 99% of the time, he won't be missing his assignment...

Hootie 02-27-2009 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5534030)
I'd have no problem had they signed him as a FA.

Trading a draft pick, ANY draft pick for him is foolish.

Well get used to it. The Patriots use their draft picks to make their team better...whether it be drafting a player, trading the pick for a player, or trading the pick for more picks (or better picks) down the road...

I'll take Vrabel and his leadership and ability to teach the young guys how to be professionals for two years over a coin flip between Kevin Robinson/Mike Merritt/Barry Richardson OR IF WE GET LUCKY Brandon Carr.

There is what, a 0.005% chance of landing a Tom Brady late in the draft?

StcChief 02-27-2009 02:09 PM

Pioli is running the team now. Cautiously optimistic... if the pick isn't too high.

If he can run the LBers I'll be happy with a turn around.

DeezNutz 02-27-2009 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5534048)
If it is a 3rd or 4th rounder it will become apparent really quickly as to who was the male and who was the female in the Belichick/Pioli relationship.

And it would be advisable for this board to be temporarily shut down.

blueballs 02-27-2009 02:10 PM

the comedy on this thread alone
is worth a high 7th

ceebz 02-27-2009 02:10 PM

I'm guessing it will be a conditional pick. This sucks for Dorsey, though. I don't really see him working out as a 3-4 end. Maybe he'll get traded before the draft?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.