why dont you take another extended absence. it's comical to think that BB did it all. comical

Because they won't admit their mistake after 2.

Hell, for sake of conversation, let's say they do.

So we're at 2 years of growing pains with a 27 year old, and 2+ years with a rookie QB.

Sorry, but 4 years wasted doesn't excite me much more than 5.

I'm not excited about this years Chiefs but like i've said, it'll be this off-season where I judge Pioli.

Not leaders who lead.

Flipping the bird to the O who is whipping your ass and slamming your helmet isn't leadership.

I don't see anybody talking about Cassel but billay. And you.

This is a valid point.

11 should, and you are right the defense is what lost them 4 of those games

But it's the truth.

Why do you think Cassel's play has gone down while the rest of the team improves?

haha Vrabel flipped the bird?

sorry i forgot you can read minds. we'll see how everything plays out

Dropping 2 Td's is improvement? This offense hasn't imrpoved Claythan, the line is still ass, we have a RB who can't hold onto the ball. The teams best player has missed 4 games and we've still won more then last year.

Now Dorsey (who was not drafted by this group as we all know) and Jackson have been relegated to never going to be better than serviceable and then the $ is thrown in there to prove they must be better than good to be a success.

Yet when the $ was discussed when draft time came around and some people thought it was too risky to throw that much $ at a rookie QB the answer to that was why the hell do you care, its not your money.

Now Cassel is the $60 Million failure. The money seems to be a pretty hot topic now, though it sure wasn't in April.

The production from the running game has improved. Chambers is a massive upgrade. Pope is an upgrade. The pass blocking has improved quite a bit. It was very solid yesterday.

Cassel has not improved. His completion percentage and touchdown to interception ratio have taken nosedives in the last six weeks.

Are you blind? These things are obvious.

First, they are playing a much tougher schedule, and second, their defense isn't playing to expectations with the loss of Seymour and the injury to Mayo.

The numbers look comparable, but they've gone from facing Favre, Pennington and Edwards twice a season to Sanchez, Henne and Fitzpatrick.

The passing offense, however, has improved.

Isn't this a bit hypocritical considering the article you wrote after the game?
Which is it? Are they getting better or not. You are really confusing me.