Jenson71 |
03-08-2010 10:44 AM |
I answered two of the questions.
I said it was a bad drug. By this I mean it is often mind altering and escapist, like alcohol. Sometimes that's a good thing, though. For instance, if you are like Pam here or others suffering from physical pain. You should have the ability to smoke pot in order to ease that. For those of us not suffering, but still just want to smoke pot because it makes them feel better, I think the costs aren't as drastic as the economic benefits (stopping the costly punishments, taxes). Thus I'm not opposed to legalizing it.
The people that reguarly smoked pot in my high school were complete losers, though, and most have made nothing of their potential and today wallow in simple pleasures like X-Box games and cheap beer. I have tried it on more than one occassion, and it did nothing for me, thank God.
Employers have drug tests (though this is a touchy subject for good reason: random drug tests, drug tests for no reason, and other potential issues are serious concerns and invasions of privacy in many cases). What is true is that employers should be able to expect that their employees aren't drunk or high on the job. Those who work for a good company will probably not smoke pot, if they wish to move ahead or not get fired. Those who want to work hard and achieve economic and social success in life will stay away from it, just like they mostly stay away from other dangers now. I don't see a drastic social change coming from legalizing pot, like society becoming less productive. Perhaps it can reinforce the increasing inequality in America, but that is a social crisis that is much deeper than the issue of drugs, and can be dealt with regardless of legalization.
|