ChiefsPlanet
Page 14 of 16 « First 410111213 14 1516
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Wright: Chiefs seriously considering Leinart (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=232969)

Johnny Vegas 09-05-2010 09:21 AM
thats some deep shit man...

http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/20...rtdowneyjr.jpg

Marcellus 09-05-2010 09:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Brooklyn (Post 6979021)
Most of those same people are arguing that Leinart is a more accurate QB than Cassel. So, while they both share that same weekness, Leinart makes up for it by being better than Cassel in other areas.
But he isn't more accurate and his numbers and history back that up. That's an urban myth.

He is a career 57% passer. He is what he is I don't care what "system" he was in. He checks the ball down anyway and that's why he lost his job.

He didn't just start throwing dink and dunk passes this preseason. Checkdown has always been his MO and he still only completed 57%.

Marcellus 09-05-2010 09:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DBOSHO (Post 6979028)
It is when you are being paid millions to practice train and play likean nfl qb

Thanks for clarifying. I wasn't sure.

Ugly Duck 09-05-2010 09:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DBOSHO (Post 6979017)
Just google image" matt leinart" and you'll see all that guy cared about.

Hot tubs and bitches
He's a man that really loves a bottle of champagne.

Lzen 09-05-2010 09:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6977269)
Here comes the implosion...
Why?

He should be better than Palko.

TheGuardian 09-05-2010 09:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6979004)
You don't watch much football do you? He was having a Better pre season than Anderson. He just doesn't fit what they want to do on offense. He does fit what we want to do dumbass.
As Milkman noted, he looked like shit. Which is why he was cut you ****ing moron.

Red Brooklyn 09-05-2010 09:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by notorious (Post 6979027)
What he might be able to do better (and yes, I am pulling this out of my ass) is hitting his receivers in stride.


Cassel rarely puts the ball in a place so that the receiver doesn't break stride.
But I wonder if he does that so far and away better that it would be worth bringing him in. Beyond everything else that's been mentioned, I'm not sure Cassel could handle having Leinart on the sidelines. We don't need to give Cassel one more thing to think/worry/stress about.

Marcellus 09-05-2010 09:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Brooklyn (Post 6979042)
But I wonder if he does that so far and away better that it would be worth bringing him in. Beyond everything else that's been mentioned, I'm not sure Cassel could handle having Leinart on the sidelines. We don't need to give Cassel one more thing to think/worry/stress about.
Cassel whooped his ass head to head when he was in NE and Lienart was in AZ.

Score is 1-0 Cassel in the NFL. He ain't skeeered.

notorious 09-05-2010 09:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Brooklyn (Post 6979042)
But I wonder if he does that so far and away better that it would be worth bringing him in. Beyond everything else that's been mentioned, I'm not sure Cassel could handle having Leinart on the sidelines. We don't need to give Cassel one more thing to think/worry/stress about.
If Cassel can't handle a poor backup QB on the sideline, what will he do on the field?




Oh, wait.......he is already poor on the field.

Red Brooklyn 09-05-2010 09:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6979044)
Cassel whooped his ass head to head when he was in NE and Lienart was in AZ.

Score is 1-0 Cassel in the NFL. He ain't skeeered.
:D

Well, hell, bring Leinart in then. Let him play back-up. Maybe it'll make Cassel better, give him something to prove - something to rub a nose in.

milkman 09-05-2010 09:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Brooklyn (Post 6979042)
But I wonder if he does that so far and away better that it would be worth bringing him in. Beyond everything else that's been mentioned, I'm not sure Cassel could handle having Leinart on the sidelines. We don't need to give Cassel one more thing to think/worry/stress about.
I don't see any benefit to bringing in Leinart.

He sucks.

Whether he sucks more or less than Cassel is irrelevant.

Let's bring in a kid developmental prospect that might actually have a chance to grow into a good NFL QB rather than bring in another piece of crap whose biggest selling point is that he's better than Palko.

ChiefaRoo 09-05-2010 09:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Brooklyn (Post 6979042)
But I wonder if he does that so far and away better that it would be worth bringing him in. Beyond everything else that's been mentioned, I'm not sure Cassel could handle having Leinart on the sidelines. We don't need to give Cassel one more thing to think/worry/stress about.
RB, if Cassel folds to the pressure of bring in Leinart then he stands NO chance of leading KC to a Championship. It's a moot point. Bring in Leinart and lets watch what happens.

Red Brooklyn 09-05-2010 09:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6979048)
let's bring in a kid developmental prospect that might actually have a chance to grow into a good NFL QB rather than bring in another piece of crap who's biggest selling point is that he's better than Palko.
This would be my preference as well.

TheGuardian 09-05-2010 09:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6979048)
I don't see any benefit to bringing in Leinart.

He sucks.

Whether he sucks more or less than Cassel is irrelevant.

Let's bring in a kid developmental prospect that might actually have a chance to grow into a good NFL QB rather than bring in another piece of crap whose biggest selling point is that he's better than Palko.
This.

I'm no Cassel fan, and all for replacing him. But you don't replace a chicken shit sandwich with a dogshit sandwich. And that's what it would be. I don't get the fascination of stupid posters who want to bring in every failed and bust QB in here. Cassel and Leinart are similar except that at least Cassel appears like he WANTS to play football as a priority. So in that regard, Cassel is the better choice. End of ****ing discussion.

Bane 09-05-2010 09:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6979048)
I don't see any benefit to bringing in Leinart.

He sucks.

Whether he sucks more or less than Cassel is irrelevant.

Let's bring in a kid developmental prospect that might actually have a chance to grow into a good NFL QB rather than bring in another piece of crap whose biggest selling point is that he's better than Palko.
Don't know any better way to say it.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:13 PM.
Page 14 of 16 « First 410111213 14 1516
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.