Oh so losing the rest of the games to get rid of Cassel would be cool with you if it didn't set back player development?

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA

Wow you are ****ing reeruned.

And boom goes the dynamite.

Yes is would be ok with me. As it should be with you. But if players were developing that includes Cassel.

Did I mention **** YOU?

Even if he finds a quote, it's still the wrong point he's making.

I understand why some might have wanted the Chiefs to lose.

If a team is playing a weak schedule and is winning in SPITE of the horrendous QB play, the QB will keep the job simply because the team is winning. Not only are then the wins built on a faulty foundation (weak schedule, good running game), the team is also hurting its position in the draft and thus eliminating the possibility of drafting a good QB. Then comes the next season and now the schedule is harder, we're stuck with the shitty QB who now costing the team wins and it all comes to a grinding halt. BAD.

NOW

IF the QB succeeds (plays well), then we don't need to worry about the former scenario. Nobody was hoping for Cassel to fail. NOBODY.

I hope this will help Pawntard understand the difference between people hoping the team loses and QB failing.

You're an idiot. There is nothing wrong with losing when there is progress being made.

The main point here is that Cassel isn't going anywhere. It's time everyone accepted that. I want him to do well every week. I want him to prove those of us that are not sold on him yet wrong. I want to get back to the Chiefs being a contender every year and eventually getting over that superbowl hump.

funny, 'cause you put yourself on the lower level, not me.

you're the one stealing from yourself.

I just pointed you out to someone who did hope for just that....did you not read it? Can you read?

There's nothing wrong with being a homer, stevie. However, the term itself implies that any logic is thrown out the window. I'm not quite sure why you always show up and try to make a point in an argument - you're, literally, unable to do so because you're biased. You're like a mother who loves a crackhead sucking dick for money while the rest of the world despises and/or feels sorry for him.

Yeah, I read it. I don't see where he said he wanted Cassel to fail. I see where he said he wanted the team to lose. It fits perfectly with what I outlined in my post. Why don't you go read it again , champ.

I just keep picturing Cassel throwing to Bowe, Moeaki, McCluster & Larry Fitzgerald next year along with Charles in the backfield!

That's a real nice offense.

So if you had a daughter who turned out to be a prostitute and smoked crack you would stop loving her?

Interesting insight into your one dimensional soul, thank you.

:spock:

OK, Steve.

I'm sorry that you don't hold the ability to not only live and die with this team, but be able to be critical when necessary without fear of damaging your superfan rep. Most of us can do both.

But please, continue claiming that I'm "stealing from myself" if you think that makes you a better fan.

Oh so you didn't see where he wanted cassel to lose his job?

Or you didnt realize losing a job = fail

Or are you just a ****ing douche troll?