![]() |
Quote:
I believe that Belcher is going to continue to progress, and I'm talking about spending some money to upgrade the NT position in front of him. And,once again, I also think a reliable slot receiver is more valuable to this offense and to Cassel than you do. That's a guy that Cassel will utilize to move the chains, moreso than the two guys on the outside. |
Quote:
|
Defense is NOT the problem, FFS.
|
Quote:
He also adds a similar weapon to what we already have, while Breaston would add a deep threat with consistent hands. Breaston would be a better fit. JMO |
Quote:
That goes for both sides of the ball, but I think we did exactly that with the Hudson pick. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But, we would, so it's not even close IMO. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Here is the thing, signing Breaston would actually be a good thing even with Cassel for several reasons. One is Cassel plays better out of the shotgun set. Breaston allows us to go to that more often. Second, Charles is even more dangerous when the field is more spread out. Not to mention our line is not a big powerful line designed for smashmouth football. They are agile and built for open space. This allows them to be even more effective. I really don't see the downsize. We can get by with Belcher at ILB, we can't get by with the shit we have at WR.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Teams can run right up the gut on us. I'm not a huge fan of Belcher, and feel he could be upgraded, but NT and Vrabel's spot are much more important. Let's face it we won 4 games due to defense and/or special teams. We had one other game where the defense played well and the offense did shit. We had a playoff game where the defense held as long as they could while the offense kept turning the ball over. Honestly, besides the soft schedule, the defense is the biggest reason this team went 10-6 last year. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
(please don't say Studebaker) |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.