ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs KC already has a list of GM candidates to replace Pioli (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=265240)

rabblerouser 10-16-2012 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9022725)
Chicago Bears send their regard. So do the Colts that carried Peyton to a SB.

that's what the 'except Indy' meant, and you could hardly say their defense was anything more than along for that ride.

Chicago has the horses to pull it off...but I ain't seen a Bear wearing a ring since '85...and that D was the 46.

rabblerouser 10-16-2012 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9022727)
The 2-gap defense isn't as bad as everyone says, but I'd prefer we run 1-gap. Our defensive woes the last few games have a lot more to do with softness, poor scheme preparation, and lack of focus. Not as much of a talent issue.

A lot of our defensive problems will be fixed by just having a head coach who gets his players to play with discipline and intensity. Romeo was such a stupid hire for head coach, it's mind-numbing.

I agree with this assessment down the line; I hate passive defense as a general rule...but this D was WAAAY better the past 2 years.

Mind numbing is indeed the word...

I'm still in shock.

chiefscafan 10-16-2012 09:27 PM

Sorry I'm just confused with all the information I've heard pioli is fired , resigned or signed a new contract. I can't see how he is getting fired of he's on the radio tomorrow. If he says cassel is our qb and can lead us to a super bowl in gonna start laughing.

chiefzilla1501 10-16-2012 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9022712)
I get it: You actually work for Pioli's Chiefs.

Clancy Pendergast ran the 31st ranked defense in Arizona for not one year, but two. He was a cluster**** of a hire but only you could provide the reach-around defense.

Idiot.

Umm... what?

This is a knock on a GM who hired a coach and then jammed his own philosophy on the guy. How is that an endorsement for either guy?

Sorter 10-16-2012 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Driving Wheel (Post 9022732)
that's what the 'except Indy' meant, and you could hardly say their defense was anything more than along for that ride.

Chicago has the horses to pull it off...but I ain't seen a Bear wearing a ring since '85...and that D was the 46.

When they went to the SB (in regards to Indy)? Try again. That defense was lights-out.

As to Chicago...the only defenses that are successful in your mind are the ones that win a SB? Because that is what you essentially said. Please clarify.

chiefzilla1501 10-16-2012 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Driving Wheel (Post 9022744)
I agree with this assessment down the line; I hate passive defense as a general rule...but this D was WAAAY better the past 2 years.

Mind numbing is indeed the word...

I'm still in shock.

It's really not mind-numbing. I have a bunch of Browns fan friends so I knew what to expect from Romeo. It was a hilariously bad hire and I knew exactly this would happen, though I thought it would take 3 years to happen.

This defense is soft. They don't tackle. They play with zero focus. They over think. And when you wonder why, look no further than the emotionless guy with the headset who walks into press conferences with a helpless look on his face.

chiefscafan 10-16-2012 09:35 PM

But the d looked good last year. Is it the d or do they have Zero confidence in the qb? That has a lot to do with what is happening.

tredadda 10-16-2012 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kushed god (Post 9021171)
I don't want none of those ****ing losers.

Sooooooooooo you want to stick with the guy who has hit on 3 draft picks in 3 FREAKING YEARS (Succop, Berry, Houston) drafting our franchise QB?

jspchief 10-16-2012 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefscafan (Post 9022790)
But the d looked good last year. Is it the d or do they have Zero confidence in the qb? That has a lot to do with what is happening.

it didn't look that good. They suffered a lot of blowouts. They played well against bad teams/QBs. Green Bay was the one exception where they played good D against a good team.

tredadda 10-16-2012 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9022849)
it didn't look that good. They suffered a lot of blowouts. They played well against bad teams/QBs. Green Bay was the one exception where they played good D against a good team.

I don't think the D is a problem talent wise. I think it is all coaching. Get a competent defensive coordinator in and we would have a top 10 defense.

jspchief 10-16-2012 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 9022858)
I don't think the D is a problem talent wise. I think it is all coaching. Get a competent defensive coordinator in and we would have a top 10 defense.

I agree we can be better. coaching and scheme are killing this defense.

xztop12 10-16-2012 09:54 PM

Get me Mike Nolan in any capacity.

qabbaan 10-16-2012 09:55 PM

I'm not going to be too picky about who it is. We all thought we had a coup when we hired Pioli...

tredadda 10-16-2012 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by qabbaan (Post 9022879)
I'm not going to be too picky about who it is. We all thought we had a coup when we hired Pioli...

How wrong most us us who supported him were.

58-4ever 10-16-2012 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by qabbaan (Post 9022879)
I'm not going to be too picky about who it is. We all thought we had a coup when we hired Pioli...

In retrospect, it was like that South Park episode with the Shit Sandwich and the Douchebag


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.