Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger (Post 14229899)

Sadly minorities are "guilty" until proven innocent in many American's eyes. And this will never change. She recorded him and made accusations which he denied. But hey, the mob party has formed and they want blood. I just pray the Chiefs are smarter today than they were with Kareem. Show some guts and weather the storm because the only team who loses here is us, no-one else. and the same biased hypocrites will turn around and cry when Tyreek signs with another team and we lose in the playoffs AGAIN.

Originally Posted by mdchiefsfan (Post 14230260)

Those are the easy dots to connect. Of course it looks bad. I’m demonstrating that there is more to it than just those dots.

Can you deny that either scenario is possible with the information you currently possess?

Originally Posted by RINGLEADER (Post 14230239)

Curious (because I don’t know) but would the police have asked his boy who broke his arm and if the kid said Daddy would they be able to act on that? Not commenting on the case but was interested to know if police actually interview minors in situations like this?

Originally Posted by ARROW2 (Post 14230152)

It's a terrible attempt at a setup.

Originally Posted by Kman34 (Post 14229861)

I'm afraid Mr Fax... that the NFL will..

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 14230252)

Admitting to whipping a toddler with a belt puts him in Adrian Peterson territory..

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger (Post 14229934)

You really took that seriously? "And you should be terrified of me too bitch that's why you can't keep a ****ing man"....THAT DOESN'T EVEN MAKE SENSE so It's not even to be taken seriously imo. I think he meant "You should be terrified of me leaving you", hence the "can't keep a man" line but hey, people have made up their minds and clearly aren't prepared to budge.

Originally Posted by DrunkBassGuitar (Post 14230281)

they would have alerted DFS which would have done an investigation and determined if it was just like an injury that a kid got from falling off a bike or a trampoline or something or if there were signs of abuse.

On a related note: DFS removed the child from Hill and his fiancee's custody.

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 14230195)

Fair question. How many of you got your ass whipped with a belt when you were a kid?

I did. Several times.

Is it that it's actually child abuse, or have we become a society that screams child abuse whenever anyone touches their kid? Personally, I think far too few kids of the last 20 years have had their asses whooped but good at least once. I think we're too ****ing soft on kids and they have mostly turned into a bunch of useless, mouthy ****s.

I'm not suggesting you beat the living dog shit out of the kid and that this is okay. I'm saying, I got my pants yanked down and one good ****ing crack with a belt. I don't see anything inherently wrong with that, situationally.

Now, punching a kid in the chest? Yeah, I have issues with that if he was, quite literally, punching a 3-year-old kid. Now was he actually "punching" the kid or was he giving him a little fist bump and saying "come on kiddo suck it up and be my little man?" Big ****ing difference and one she could twist in the wrong light.

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 14230295)

Where does he say that?

Am I listening to the wrong video?

FAX

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 14230290)

Let them.

He's gonna get suspended. 8 games. Then he comes back.

If I'm the Chiefs, I stipulate that he no longer has anything to do with that crazy ****ed up conniving bitch.

The ONLY time he's ever been in trouble is when she's been pregnant and hormonal.

And let's not overlook the fact that she's an admitted LIAR, who admits to perjury on the tape.

Hell, we don't know that she didn't lie when she accused him of beating her the first time, in Oklahoma.

Liar is as a liar does.

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 14230252)

Admitting to whipping a toddler with a belt puts him in Adrian Peterson territory..