ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Royals 2010 Kansas City Royals Repository thread (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=221199)

DeezNutz 06-16-2010 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 6825318)
Well, I can't say that would be a bad idea. I can see it now, Deez, we trade DDJ for a couple draft picks and maybe a high prospect, sign some old, Guillen re-hash for waaaay to much $ to replace him and go on the hurry up and wait wagon again.

Meanwhile you have a legit player who has a lot of his career still ahead of him playing for another team.

I know what you mean, and Royals fans have sure as **** been in this position far too often.

That said, I don't think you can think of DDJ as a player who fits because we have a 1B, 3B, SS, LF, C, etc. coming up. It just doesn't work like that because one or more of those players, likely, won't develop as hoped.

DeJesus is just a solid ball player, and I hope we keep him. But if we can get max. return, I think you have to make the deal. I'm in the same place with him now as I was with Soria last year.

If the return is REALLY solid, you make the move and don't look back.

petegz28 06-16-2010 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6825328)
I know what you mean, and Royals fans have sure as **** been in this position far too often.

That said, I don't think you can think of DDJ as a player who fits because we have a 1B, 3B, SS, LF, C, etc. coming up. It just doesn't work like that because one or more of those players, likely, won't develop as hoped.

DeJesus is just a solid ball player, and I hope we keep him. But if we can get max. return, I think you have to make the deal. I'm in the same place with him now as I was with Soria last year.

If the return is REALLY solid, you make the move and don't look back.

So what would constitute a REALLY solid return?

DeezNutz 06-16-2010 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 6825403)
So what would constitute a REALLY solid return?

2-3 high-level prospects.

For DeJesus, we'd probably get 2, but I'd want both to be among the top-5 in someone's organization. If this seems too steep, and it might, I'd tell 'em to **** off.

It could be that DDJ's market value isn't as great as his relative value to the Royals.

CHENZ A! 06-16-2010 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6825683)
2-3 high-level prospects.

For DeJesus, we'd probably get 2, but I'd want both to be among the top-5 in someone's organization. If this seems too steep, and it might, I'd tell 'em to **** off.

It could be that DDJ's market value isn't as great as his relative value to the Royals.

If we got 1 high level prospect for Dave I'd be thrilled.
Posted via Mobile Device

Demonpenz 06-16-2010 03:23 PM

The thing about DDJ is if you get 1 high level prospect your likely to get...you guessed it...another DDJ..... a solid major leaguer.

Kraus 06-16-2010 03:29 PM

I have a feeling we're going to get screwed again if(when) we trade DDJ. I'm fine with trading every other player on that list, except Bannister.

DeezNutz 06-16-2010 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Demonpenz (Post 6825782)
The thing about DDJ is if you get 1 high level prospect your likely to get...you guessed it...another DDJ..... a solid major leaguer.

Which would be ridiculously stupid.

DeezNutz 06-16-2010 03:48 PM

Hochevar to the DL.

http://mlb.fanhouse.com/2010/06/16/m...ebook-june-16/

petegz28 06-16-2010 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Demonpenz (Post 6825782)
The thing about DDJ is if you get 1 high level prospect your likely to get...you guessed it...another DDJ..... a solid major leaguer.

Exactly! And then you are back on the "well, just a few more years" bandwagon.

We trade DDJ for a prospect or 2 that, in a few more years, will become DDJ.

petegz28 06-16-2010 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6825840)

Ok, now that sucks!

petegz28 06-16-2010 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kraus (Post 6825802)
I have a feeling we're going to get screwed again if(when) we trade DDJ. I'm fine with trading every other player on that list, except Bannister.

I'd trade Bannister. He is nothing that wouldn't be hard to replace. And given a healthy rotation, I would be happy letting Chen replace him if that were the case.

petegz28 06-16-2010 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6825683)
2-3 high-level prospects.

For DeJesus, we'd probably get 2, but I'd want both to be among the top-5 in someone's organization. If this seems too steep, and it might, I'd tell 'em to **** off.

It could be that DDJ's market value isn't as great as his relative value to the Royals.

I don't even know about that. They had better be prospects that are ready to come up and play. None of this, they will be ready in 2-3 years, crap.

DeezNutz 06-16-2010 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 6825866)
I don't even know about that. They had better be prospects that are ready to come up and play. None of this, they will be ready in 2-3 years, crap.

Then you won't get anything worth a ****. And the "ready now" stipulation is the kind of crap that Glass used to insist upon.

That's how you get Perez for Dye and a cluster**** for Beltran. You want talent in return, but this doesn't necessarily mean advanced prospects or ML-ready ones.

DeezNutz 06-16-2010 03:59 PM

Hypothetically, someone is willing to trade you Moosetacos for DDJ. Do you do it?

Young, unproven guy with (allegedly) tremendous upside for a solid ML player. If I'm the Royals, I'd want someone like this and another high-quality prospect. A legit throw-in.

CaliforniaChief 06-16-2010 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6825840)

Interesting link. Hope Hoch can come back soon.

petegz28 06-16-2010 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6825873)
Then you won't get anything worth a ****. And the "ready now" stipulation is the kind of crap that Glass used to insist upon.

That's how you get Perez for Dye and a cluster**** for Beltran. You want talent in return, but this doesn't necessarily mean advanced prospects or ML-ready ones.

Well, here is an idea that I have....don't ****ing trade him. Keep your good players and go get more. Glass or Baird was stupid about that shit. The bottom line is this, if we are only going to keep good players until, for some reason we don't want to pay them then this team is doomed. We will forever be a team with 1 good player, maybe 2 and forever waiting on prospects to mature to replace them as we pawn them off.

DeezNutz 06-16-2010 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 6825892)
Well, here is an idea that I have....don't ****ing trade him. Keep your good players and go get more. Glass or Baird was stupid about that shit. The bottom line is this, if we are only going to keep good players until, for some reason we don't want to pay them then this team is doomed. We will forever be a team with 1 good player, maybe 2 and forever waiting on prospects to mature to replace them as we pawn them off.

LMAO.

I understand and largely agree.

petegz28 06-16-2010 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6825879)
Hypothetically, someone is willing to trade you Moosetacos for DDJ. Do you do it?

Young, unproven guy with (allegedly) tremendous upside for a solid ML player. If I'm the Royals, I'd want someone like this and another high-quality prospect. A legit throw-in.

Hell no. Moosetacos, drafted to play SS, moved to 3rd and still is 2 years out. Screw that. That's the "hurry up and wait" mentality I am talking about.

We're never going to win anything if we keep trading away our good players, overpaying has-beens and waiting on prospects.

DeezNutz 06-16-2010 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 6825897)
Hell no. Moosetacos, drafted to play SS, moved to 3rd and still is 2 years out. Screw that. That's the "hurry up and wait" mentality I am talking about.

We're never going to win anything if we keep trading away our good players, overpaying has-beens and waiting on prospects.

Not true. It was pretty well accepted at the time of the draft that he'd be at 3B or LF/RF.

Colon should stick, though.

SnakeXJones 06-16-2010 04:11 PM

that sucks that Hoch is on the DL he has been fun to watch this season

petegz28 06-16-2010 04:18 PM

Ok, WTF is wrong with this picture? I'll give a hint, one of these things is not like the others...


The All-Star Game’s Economic Impact

2012, Kansas City: $60-65 million (estimated)

2011, Phoenix: $60-65 million (estimated)

2010, Anaheim, Calif.: $60-65 million (estimated)

2009, St. Louis: $60 million

2008, New York (AL): $148.4 million

2007, San Francisco: $65 million

2006, Pittsburgh: $52.3 million

2005, Detroit: $52.2 million

2004, Houston: $65 million

2003, Chicago (AL): $60 million

2002, Milwaukee: $50 million

2001, Seattle: $50 million

2000, Atlanta: $49 million

1999, Boston: $65 million

1998, Denver: $40.5 million

1997, Cleveland: $37.6 million

1996, Philadelphia: $55.9 million

To reach Bob Dutton, Royals reporter for The Star, send e-mail to bdutton@kcstar.com. Follow his updates at twitter.com/Royals_Report.

Posted on Wed, Jun. 16, 2010 05:06 PM

CaliforniaChief 06-16-2010 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SnakeXJones (Post 6825900)
that sucks that Hoch is on the DL he has been fun to watch this season

I just read in the Star that Yost expects him (Hoch) to miss no more than 2 starts.

SnakeXJones 06-16-2010 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 6825906)
I just read in the Star that Yost expects him (Hoch) to miss no more than 2 starts.

Thats not so bad

Sure-Oz 06-17-2010 12:15 AM

I'd still trade DDJ for atleast 2 high level prospects...they are always an 'if' but it's not like we're trading Beltran in his prime here...love DDJ as he works his tail off but he has been known to be injury prone from time to time. That said his value right now is as high as it's ever been. You trade him only for that 'right' haul, anything else tell them to **** off.

Sure-Oz 06-17-2010 12:16 AM

http://kansascity.sbnation.com/2010/...y-mike-sweeney

Sweeney would like to come to kc for 2012 as game...

Mike Sweeney Plans To Be At 2012 MLB All-Star Game In Kansas City

Jun 16 10:34p by Joel Thorman

A very familiar name to Royals fans plans to be in attendance at the 2012 MLB All-Star Game....probably not as a player though.

"My thought was, 'Well, chances are I won't be playing in 2012, but I'd like to be at that game,'" Mike Sweeney said by phone from Seattle.

Sweeney, now with the Mariners, said his teammates were very impressed with not just Kauffman Stadium but everything Kansas City has to offer.

"For many years I called Kansas City home and for it to be recognized for the All-Star Game, I'm already making plans for July 2012," he said.

"Hopefully, we'll see Zack Greinke or Billy Butler or Joakim Soria in the game. Or Mike Moustakas, you never know."

Ah, it's good to hear Sweeney's heart is still in the right place.

Chiefspants 06-17-2010 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6826703)
http://kansascity.sbnation.com/2010/...y-mike-sweeney

Sweeney would like to come to kc for 2012 as game...

Mike Sweeney Plans To Be At 2012 MLB All-Star Game In Kansas City

Jun 16 10:34p by Joel Thorman

A very familiar name to Royals fans plans to be in attendance at the 2012 MLB All-Star Game....probably not as a player though.

"My thought was, 'Well, chances are I won't be playing in 2012, but I'd like to be at that game,'" Mike Sweeney said by phone from Seattle.

Sweeney, now with the Mariners, said his teammates were very impressed with not just Kauffman Stadium but everything Kansas City has to offer.

"For many years I called Kansas City home and for it to be recognized for the All-Star Game, I'm already making plans for July 2012," he said.

"Hopefully, we'll see Zack Greinke or Billy Butler or Joakim Soria in the game. Or Mike Moustakas, you never know."

Ah, it's good to hear Sweeney's heart is still in the right place.

My respect for Sweeney has ballooned because he knows the name of one of our top prospects.

WilliamTheIrish 06-17-2010 09:25 AM

Quote:

Sweeney would like to come to kc for 2012 as game...
GREAT!

He can a buy ticket.

Demonpenz 06-17-2010 09:37 AM

Maybe we can induct him in the Royals Hall Of Fame that weekend.

CaliforniaChief 06-17-2010 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Demonpenz (Post 6827025)
Maybe we can induct him in the Royals Hall Of Fame that weekend.

And the promptly watch A-Roid or another guy smash the windows in the HOF during the Home Run Derby.

Can you imagine, with the limited number of seats out there, how much THOSE seats will fetch for the HR Derby?

DeezNutz 06-17-2010 10:26 AM

Royals fans, I've been thinking, which is dangerous...

Will having the 2012 All-Star Game cause us to be more proactive in FA and trades to ensure that we have a respectable product on the field in 2012? Will Glass be induced to spend even more to pursue the best talent?

Imagine the organization's embarrassment if the national spotlight has to shine upon an organization that has been flirting with a .400 winning percentage for years...

CaliforniaChief 06-17-2010 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6827161)
Royals fans, I've been thinking, which is dangerous...

Will having the 2012 All-Star Game cause us to be more proactive in FA and trades to ensure that we have a respectable product on the field in 2012? Will Glass be induced to spend even more to pursue the best talent?

Imagine the organization's embarrassment if the national spotlight has to shine upon an organization that has been flirting with a .400 winning percentage for years...

Or he's just banking on the guys in Double A coming up and being stars...and if they struggle we'll load up on the Milton Bradley's, Reggie Sanders', and Jose Guillen's of the game.

Reaper16 06-17-2010 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6827161)
Royals fans, I've been thinking, which is dangerous...

Will having the 2012 All-Star Game cause us to be more proactive in FA and trades to ensure that we have a respectable product on the field in 2012? Will Glass be induced to spend even more to pursue the best talent?

Imagine the organization's embarrassment if the national spotlight has to shine upon an organization that has been flirting with a .400 winning percentage for years...

How did it work for the Pirates when PNC Park hosted the game?

DeezNutz 06-17-2010 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 6827173)
Or he's just banking on the guys in Double A coming up and being stars...and if they struggle we'll load up on the Milton Bradley's, Reggie Sanders', and Jose Guillen's of the game.

No doubt that's a major part, but we'll have so many contracts off the books that I find it doubtful that we'll keep our ML payroll at ridiculously low records.

"Well...the Royals are struggling Joe. Lot of young players and a $25M payroll..."

That wouldn't play that well, I don't think.

DeezNutz 06-17-2010 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6827177)
How did it work for the Pirates when PNC Park hosted the game?

Shut the **** up. Don't bring past history into this thread as evidence for future possibilities.

Demonpenz 06-17-2010 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6827181)
Shut the **** up. Don't bring past history into this thread as evidence for future possibilities.

no shit what is this baseball?

alnorth 06-18-2010 10:06 PM

cool article from Rany today, mostly to express his irritation that Gordon and Ka'aihue are still in Omaha. He basically argues that if these two do still have something to learn about their swings, they wont ever learn against the pitchers they are currently dominating.

Quote:

And finally, like most Triple-A teams the O-Royals have a couple of veteran sluggers manning the 3-4 slots in their lineups. Unfortunately, neither one is a real prospect, as both of them are 36 years old.

No, wait, that’s a typo. They’re both 26 years old. Hmmm.

Let’s look a little closer then. One of them has a .385 OBP and a .526 SLG, the other one has a .402 OBP and a .513 SLG. Very good numbers for Triple-A, but I worry that their bats might be a little short to man left field and first base in the majors.

Oh, sorry – another typo. The left fielder doesn’t have a .385 OBP – he has a…wait, what?

A .485 OBP? And a .626 SLG?

The first baseman has a .502 OBP? A .613 SLG?

As Cartman would say, “Da F@!k?”
Quote:

In Gordon and Ka’aihue, the Royals have two of the three highest slugging averages in Triple-A, and two of the three best OBPs in the entire freaking minor leagues. Yet they wait. And wait. And wait.

Sure-Oz 06-18-2010 10:19 PM

They really need to make room for Gordon and Kila and get them up asap. I think it's a waste at this point, they will continue to shred that pitching

Sure-Oz 06-18-2010 10:24 PM

Royals_Report

#Royals recall OF Rick Ankiel from rehab assignment at Class AAA Omaha after problems resurface in his strained right quadriceps muscle.

Per bob dutton twitter


What a dogshit signing

Sure-Oz 06-18-2010 10:25 PM

#Royals put LHP prospect Mike Montgomery back on DL at Class AA Northwest Arkansas following a recurrence of elbow soreness. about 5 hours ago via web

Not good, let the kid rest as long as possible

Deberg_1990 06-18-2010 10:25 PM

Only the Royals.... :facepalm:

tk13 06-18-2010 10:40 PM

Yeah, that's why Rany isn't a GM. I don't know about Gordon, I hope he's turned the corner. I think Kila is ready though, time to find out what he's made of.

But, in the large scheme of things... it isn't going to hurt either one of these guys to wait a couple more weeks. Everybody always wants to rush. The smart play has to be running Guillen and some of these other guys out there and see if anyone bites. With our luck no one will and we'll keep playing them.

But until that happens, the correct move is to run out the veterans who are actually playing fairly decent and flip them for whatever we can get. Then actually give Gordon and Kila AB's everyday and not some platoon garbage. Kila really should be up now, but it's in the best interest of both him and Guillen to get AB's everyday.

Sure-Oz 06-18-2010 10:45 PM

I hear you about Guillen and the vets. I'm impatient but we definetly need to get them for whatever. Guillen will probably keep playing RF as a showcase anyway. I hope they get Pods out of here as well and Willie and whoever else that is real dead weight to the team. Ankiel looks like he'll be here the rest of the year on the DL

CaliforniaChief 06-18-2010 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6831264)
I hear you about Guillen and the vets. I'm impatient but we definetly need to get them for whatever. Guillen will probably keep playing RF as a showcase anyway. I hope they get Pods out of here as well and Willie and whoever else that is real dead weight to the team. Ankiel looks like he'll be here the rest of the year on the DL

Rick Ankiel might succeed Coco Crisp as the recipient of the Zach Thomas Award. It's a trophy with an exercise bike and a phrase that says:

"You were going to be great for us. Well, bye."

DeezNutz 06-18-2010 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6831244)
#Royals put LHP prospect Mike Montgomery back on DL at Class AA Northwest Arkansas following a recurrence of elbow soreness. about 5 hours ago via web

Not good, let the kid rest as long as possible

Ah, yes, "elbow soreness." Also known as the familiar prelude to Tommy John's.

And the fact that Kila and Gordon aren't up now is stupid. I could care less about what little value Guillen and Pods might possess, as it would be in the best interest of the organization, long-term, to...wait for it...have the best players, who happen to be the younger players, actually, you know, playing.

tk13 06-19-2010 12:39 AM

If this was April it'd be different. We're a week away from trade season kicking in, with a guy who at least looks like he could hit 30 HR and another that could steal 50 bases. You aren't getting Kyle Drabek but at least try to get something. Otherwise that would be just giving up, I hate that.

But I don't think making them wait a couple more weeks is going to hurt anything. Although Kila should be up. Gordon maybe... but he really wasn't more productive than Pods and he's still playing a new position. I'm willing to have a bit of patience with Gordon... if he comes up and plays like he did before... that might be game over for him in KC.

But it's the same never ending cycle of amnesia... most people that have been around know how that drove me nuts going back to Baird. Bring up the young guys.. oh man they aren't ready, they need to go down. They go down, in a couple weeks get on a hot streak... bring them back up! Play the young guys, they're the future! The list of prospects the Royals haven't flubbed around with is embarrassingly small.

alnorth 06-19-2010 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 6831260)
Yeah, that's why Rany isn't a GM. I don't know about Gordon, I hope he's turned the corner. I think Kila is ready though, time to find out what he's made of.

But, in the large scheme of things... it isn't going to hurt either one of these guys to wait a couple more weeks. Everybody always wants to rush. The smart play has to be running Guillen and some of these other guys out there and see if anyone bites. With our luck no one will and we'll keep playing them.

But until that happens, the correct move is to run out the veterans who are actually playing fairly decent and flip them for whatever we can get. Then actually give Gordon and Kila AB's everyday and not some platoon garbage. Kila really should be up now, but it's in the best interest of both him and Guillen to get AB's everyday.

Regarding Rany, you might want to re-read his article, particularly the "I hope we are trying to trade Guillen and Podsednik" part. He said if they are not playing August 1, then our front office is screwed up.

Quote:

I remain hopeful that the Royals really do understand that Gordon and Ka’aihue could step into the team’s lineup tomorrow and improve the team at two positions, and that they’re simply waiting to unload guys like Guillen and Podsednik onto other teams first. Whether they’re able to do that or not is a question that requires its own article. For now, it’s not unreasonable of the Royals to hope they can swing a trade. But the team’s excuses will pass with the trading deadline in six weeks. Come August 1st, both Gordon and Ka’aihue are in the Royals’ everyday lineup, or I’ll take back every nice thing I’ve said about this organization this year.
Even given that though, I simply do not agree at all with even that point. I believe you reach a point where it gets utterly silly. 1.100-1.200 OPS in a lot of AB is that point, where you pretty much have to play or trade them right now. The fact that Gordon and Kila could be in Omaha instead of here another 4-5 weeks is highly difficult to defend. These aren't marginal guys who are maybe hopefully getting close. They are, right now, arguably 2 of the best baseball players in the entire minor league systems of all 30 MLB clubs. There is not a very good reason for them to keep playing in Omaha, at all.

edit: as far as "rushing" them, they are 26. In Kila's case, he is being held back, not rushed. He should have been up here all of last year. Gordon... who knows. It's not a fluke small sample size with him though, perhaps he figured something out this year and wasn't given much of a chance this season at all before being banished up north.

alnorth 06-19-2010 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 6831388)
But it's the same never ending cycle of amnesia... most people that have been around know how that drove me nuts going back to Baird. Bring up the young guys.. oh man they aren't ready, they need to go down. They go down, in a couple weeks get on a hot streak... bring them back up! Play the young guys, they're the future! The list of prospects the Royals haven't flubbed around with is embarrassingly small.

26 years old.

Gordon was given a tiny 31 AB in KC, just 12 games. He's had 184 AB over 50 games in AAA to prove to all of us that we made a hilarious mistake by over-reacting to a cold start. This team isn't winning anything anyway, he can learn left field in KC.

Sure-Oz 06-19-2010 01:46 PM

http://www.baseballdecuba.com/newsContainer.asp?id=2217

Arguelles may be a bust?

Quote:

But then there is also the issue of Noel Argüelles, who might just be the biggest bust yet in the overselling of rather mediocre Cuban League talents. No one is a bigger champion of the Cuban League than I am, as all my readers know. I am not at all denigrating the level of island talent when I pick apart either Chapman or Argüelles; neither one was anything close to an island superstar. The problem here is that the large majority of ballplayers who have left the Caribbean island and reached the majors were not from the upper echelons of league talent. I have made this argument many times before, and I will not belabor it again here. Kendry Morales, Liván Hernández and El Duque are clear exceptions, of course. Alexei Ramírez, Yunel Escobar, Yunieski Betancourt and Danys Báez all showed great initial promise but have now slid to the same middle-level talent displays they earlier flashed in Cuba. But at least they were legitimate big leaguers in potential if not in staying power. But when it comes to, say, Yasser Gómez, Leslie Anderson, José Julio Ruíz, Yadel Martí and a handful of other recent so-called “defectors”—there I don’t think the big league talent stamp is anywhere nearly as clear cut. Aroldis Chapman also might yet prove to be closer in mold to Osvaldo Fernández or Yadel Martí, despite the eye-blinking fastball, elastic arm, and lithe 6-foot frame.
All of this second guessing about Aroldis Chapman eventually brings us back to Argüelles. Here is a pitcher that showed surprisingly little talent in Cuba beyond the national youth team level. Part of the problem may have been that Argüelles came to the Cuban League on the roster of a ball club with so much pitching talent that he never got a very good shot at making the grade. But that in itself speaks volumes. If Argüelles was worth $7 million than what were four or five of his Habana Province teammates (Jonder Martínez, Yadir Pedroso, Yulieski González, Miguel Lahera and Miguel Alfredo González) actually worth? Two of those guys—Jonder and Yadir—have been Cuban League ERA champs, Yulieski just missed that honor on this past season’s final weekend, and Miguel Alfredo was a top starter on September’s World Cup team in Europe. Noel Argüelles was lost in the shuffle as a 2007 season rookie in Habana Province, but his few opportunities to perform on the league’s most talented staff (15 appearances, 3 starts, a 0-5 ledger with a 7.23 ERA and almost twice as many walks as strikeouts) hardly seemed to have seven million bucks written all over them.
The irony here may well be that another recent “defector” still sitting unsigned down in the Dominican Republic seems to indeed be a legitimate potential big league starter—everything that Cincinnati and Kansas City have been claiming about Chapman and Argüelles. Yunieski Maya may be a few years older, but he was a true ace on a national team staff (2008 Olympics and 2009 World Baseball Classic) that Chapman had considerable trouble even qualifying for. Maya was by most measures the best pitcher in Cuba the season immediately before his June 2009 departure. Now we find out that Argüelles has a damaged arm and may be on the shelf for the entire summer. Compare Chapman so far to Strasburg or to his own Louisville teammate Travis Wood—or compare Argüelles to just about any other healthy prospect in the entire Kansas City organization. Either of those comparisons has to lead to a similar conclusion. It may not be clear yet how much money either the Reds or Royals organizations threw down the drain in their deals for over-sold Cuban talents. But it does seem that both clubs paid a heck of a lot more for their over-sold island prospects than they likely had to if any sanity still reined in the world of big league international talent hunting.

DeezNutz 06-19-2010 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 6831388)
If this was April it'd be different. We're a week away from trade season kicking in, with a guy who at least looks like he could hit 30 HR and another that could steal 50 bases. You aren't getting Kyle Drabek but at least try to get something. Otherwise that would be just giving up, I hate that.

But I don't think making them wait a couple more weeks is going to hurt anything. Although Kila should be up. Gordon maybe... but he really wasn't more productive than Pods and he's still playing a new position. I'm willing to have a bit of patience with Gordon... if he comes up and plays like he did before... that might be game over for him in KC.

But it's the same never ending cycle of amnesia... most people that have been around know how that drove me nuts going back to Baird. Bring up the young guys.. oh man they aren't ready, they need to go down. They go down, in a couple weeks get on a hot streak... bring them back up! Play the young guys, they're the future! The list of prospects the Royals haven't flubbed around with is embarrassingly small.

If either of these vets is moved in a week, I'll be dead wrong. But if we're waiting until the deadline, we're talking about 6 weeks and over 100 potential ABs. That experience would far outweigh any Kyle Davies (if we're lucky) that we'll get in return.

Sure-Oz 06-22-2010 11:29 PM

Lets hope this adjustment gets him back on track, maybe failure has hit him and he finally listened.

http://www.omaha.com/article/2010061...mean-promotion

Snippets i got from another board from the article...

Quote:

courtesy of Rob White of Omaha World Herald

Gordon said his adjustments to his swing are relatively minor, though both Tommy Gregg and Omaha manager Mike Jirschele think that those changes have helped put him in a better position to succeed in the majors.

Quote:
We have just tried to shorten up his swing, take the loop out of it. We have opened up his front foot a little bit, which allows his head to be turned more easily to the pitcher, and that clears his hips so he can swing through the ball a little better. Normally he would dive in and keep his foot closed, which locks up his hips and forces him to just swing with his arms more. He has been fantastic, and that makes me feel good. Guys can be really stubborn when they have had success. But I have enjoyed working with him, because he has been open. He has been willing to make adjustments, mentally and mechanically, and that is what this game is all about. - Tommy Gregg


Jirschele said Gordons swing plane is keeping the bat in the strike zone longer, improving the possibility to make consistent, hard contact.

Quote:
I see a better swing than when he came here, and he has been working hard at it. There is not anybody here who works harder than Alex does. Mike Jirschele


Particularly impressive, Gregg said, is a .397 average in 58 at-bats against left-handed pitchers, (as well as) a .507 on-base percentage and a .690 slugging percentage against lefties.

With the trading deadline roughly six weeks away, speculation has already started that Kansas City would be willing to listen to offers for Guillen, Ankiel and Podsednik, certainly, and possibly DeJesus. Moving any of those players would clear a path for Gordon.

Gregg said Gordon seems to be having fun, and he wonders how much Gordon has even worried about returning to the big leagues.

Well, Alex, have you thought about it?

Quote:
Not really. Everybody wants to be up there, obviously, but the time for that will come. Alex Gordon

BWillie 06-22-2010 11:46 PM

Maybe this was good for Alex all along. He skipped AAA. Struggled a bit at the pro level. I think this well help him get his confidence back. There is no doubting Alex's talent. He may have just developed bad habits by getting frustrated at the plate in the pros

Sure-Oz 06-22-2010 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie007 (Post 6837568)
Maybe this was good for Alex all along. He skipped AAA. Struggled a bit at the pro level. I think this well help him get his confidence back. There is no doubting Alex's talent. He may have just developed bad habits by getting frustrated at the plate in the pros

He wouldn't listen to George Brett, but george said "how do you change a guy thats never failed?"

I just hope he can be a solid piece, he has more talent than most our roster.

BWillie 06-23-2010 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6837570)
He wouldn't listen to George Brett, but george said "how do you change a guy thats never failed?"

I just hope he can be a solid piece, he has more talent than most our roster.

Yeah, but George Brett is a piece of shit. Just ask anybody who has met the guy. He probably didn't like the guy, didn't want to listen to him.

shakesthecat 06-23-2010 01:53 PM

http://twitter.com/ESPN_MLBDRAFT

"Heard Royals have agreed to terms with Christian Colon for somewhere around $2.8 million. He'll report to high-A in about ten days."



If true, they prolly won't announce it until they get back home so Colon can take BP in front of the home crowd.

DeezNutz 06-23-2010 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shakesthecat (Post 6838899)
http://twitter.com/ESPN_MLBDRAFT

"Heard Royals have agreed to terms with Christian Colon for somewhere around $2.8 million. He'll report to high-A in about ten days."



If true, they prolly won't announce it until they get back home so Colon can take BP in front of the home crowd.

w00t.

Hope to see him in '11.

Reaper16 06-23-2010 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shakesthecat (Post 6838899)
http://twitter.com/ESPN_MLBDRAFT

"Heard Royals have agreed to terms with Christian Colon for somewhere around $2.8 million. He'll report to high-A in about ten days."



If true, they prolly won't announce it until they get back home so Colon can take BP in front of the home crowd.

****. Yes.

I love the idea of Colon and Hosmer playing and advancing together.

DeezNutz 06-23-2010 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6838930)
****. Yes.

I love the idea of Colon and Hosmer playing and advancing together.

Yep. Although it's perfectly reasonable to expect to see the former in '11, while the latter should be up in '12.

Reaper16 06-23-2010 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6838934)
Yep. Although it's perfectly reasonable to expect to see the former in '11, while the latter should be up in '12.

True enough.

Demonpenz 06-23-2010 02:13 PM

everytime i see this thread bumped I hope it is for some roster move this year. guillen dumped. Kila called up ugh.

petegz28 06-23-2010 04:14 PM

another leadoff walk.....come the **** on already, Bannister

petegz28 06-23-2010 04:18 PM

And Guillen shoots his ass at the plate!!!!

petegz28 06-23-2010 04:19 PM

Lets revisit that play.....Guillen got the call..runner looked safe

Deberg_1990 06-23-2010 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 6839308)
another leadoff walk.....come the **** on already, Bannister

But his PITCH/fx system is working!! ROFL

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=229813

Reaper16 06-23-2010 04:20 PM

Pete - this is not the game thread.

DeezNutz 06-23-2010 04:20 PM

**** that shit! He was safe!

Sure-Oz 06-24-2010 12:38 PM

http://www.kfsm.com/sports/kfsm-spor...,5739521.story

Mous got ejected yesterday, awesome! video on link

i love the ump acting as if mous bumped him lmao

DeezNutz 06-24-2010 12:44 PM

KOMU has confirmed that the umpire watched both time slots of the World Cup earlier in the day.

Sure-Oz 06-28-2010 03:50 PM

Royals Pushing To Trade Jose Guillen
from mlbtraderumors.com
By Tim Dierkes [June 28, 2010 at 1:56pm CST]

The Royals are "really pushing to move Jose Guillen," tweets ESPN's Buster Olney, and "continue to tell teams they will eat a lot of dollars." Guillen, the team's designated hitter, has $6.39MM remaining on his contract.

The 34-year-old Guillen sports a .282/.344/.470 line on the season, with strong April and June work sandwiching a rough May. Aside from his time at DH, he's tallied 103 innings in right field.

Which contenders could use a potential offensive boost? An American League club makes the most sense. The White Sox and Rays don't have much at DH. The Yankees are another consideration. The Padres and Giants could be suitors, if they'd dare let Guillen play the outfield full-time again.

KCUnited 06-28-2010 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6847940)
Royals Pushing To Trade Jose Guillen
from mlbtraderumors.com
By Tim Dierkes [June 28, 2010 at 1:56pm CST]

The Royals are "really pushing to move Jose Guillen," tweets ESPN's Buster Olney, and "continue to tell teams they will eat a lot of dollars." Guillen, the team's designated hitter, has $6.39MM remaining on his contract.

The 34-year-old Guillen sports a .282/.344/.470 line on the season, with strong April and June work sandwiching a rough May. Aside from his time at DH, he's tallied 103 innings in right field.

Which contenders could use a potential offensive boost? An American League club makes the most sense. The White Sox and Rays don't have much at DH. The Yankees are another consideration. The Padres and Giants could be suitors, if they'd dare let Guillen play the outfield full-time again.

Oh sweet, Dominican, yayo snorting, baby jesus, please make this happen.

Deberg_1990 06-28-2010 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6847940)
Royals Pushing To Trade Jose Guillen
from mlbtraderumors.com
By Tim Dierkes [June 28, 2010 at 1:56pm CST]

The Royals are "really pushing to move Jose Guillen," tweets ESPN's Buster Olney, and "continue to tell teams they will eat a lot of dollars." Guillen, the team's designated hitter, has $6.39MM remaining on his contract.

The 34-year-old Guillen sports a .282/.344/.470 line on the season, with strong April and June work sandwiching a rough May. Aside from his time at DH, he's tallied 103 innings in right field.

Which contenders could use a potential offensive boost? An American League club makes the most sense. The White Sox and Rays don't have much at DH. The Yankees are another consideration. The Padres and Giants could be suitors, if they'd dare let Guillen play the outfield full-time again.

Nice...he should move to someone. At least his trade value is fairly high right now since hes hitting pretty good.

BillSelfsTrophycase 06-28-2010 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6847940)
Royals Pushing To Trade Jose Guillen
from mlbtraderumors.com
By Tim Dierkes [June 28, 2010 at 1:56pm CST]

The Royals are "really pushing to move Jose Guillen," tweets ESPN's Buster Olney, and "continue to tell teams they will eat a lot of dollars." Guillen, the team's designated hitter, has $6.39MM remaining on his contract.

The 34-year-old Guillen sports a .282/.344/.470 line on the season, with strong April and June work sandwiching a rough May. Aside from his time at DH, he's tallied 103 innings in right field.

Which contenders could use a potential offensive boost? An American League club makes the most sense. The White Sox and Rays don't have much at DH. The Yankees are another consideration. The Padres and Giants could be suitors, if they'd dare let Guillen play the outfield full-time again.

I don't care if they eat all of it, get what you can out of him before the inevetible 2 month long slump comes.

Sure-Oz 06-28-2010 04:25 PM

We probably won't get much but this is a main step in getting gordon and kila up and playing the rest of the year.

Sure-Oz 06-28-2010 05:39 PM

During the Nationals telecast on espn they are talking about how good atl did that first inning to hit the ball hard against Strasburg. Boone saying they were aggresive and intelligent, Sutcliff then says 'i think they saw the success kc had with the 9 hits and getting the win, and if he wont adjust they'll keep going that route".

kinda cool

BWillie 06-28-2010 05:44 PM

Guillen really has played better than I thought he could this year. He's tradeable for somebody desperate for some offense. He's done his part to get a trade and maybe someone will be dumb enough to give me a decent contract next year.

Mr. Arrowhead 06-28-2010 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6848095)
During the Nationals telecast on espn they are talking about how good atl did that first inning to hit the ball hard against Strasburg. Boone saying they were aggresive and intelligent, Sutcliff then says 'i think they saw the success kc had with the 9 hits and getting the win, and if he wont adjust they'll keep going that route".

kinda cool

So your telling me that ESPN does know the royals exists, huh who would have knew?

Sure-Oz 06-28-2010 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Arrowhead (Post 6848123)
So your telling me that ESPN does know the royals exists, huh who would have knew?

They're also on sunday night baseball this week to against the Angels.

tk13 06-28-2010 06:06 PM

Yeah I don't even remember the last time we were the Sunday night game on ESPN. It might have been a decade ago.

DeezNutz 06-28-2010 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6848129)
They're also on sunday night baseball this week to against the Angels.

Why?

BWillie 06-28-2010 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6848137)
Why?

Good point.

Sure-Oz 06-28-2010 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6848137)
Why?

They want to see if Billy sets the record for DP's he should be tied by sunday


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.