ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Mizzou Basketball (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=255770)

KcMizzou 02-06-2012 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 8355001)
KenPom ranks their offense 1st in the NCAA, their defense 57th.

After watching every Mizzou game... I don't believe either.

DJ's left nut 02-06-2012 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 8355014)
After watching every Mizzou game... I don't believe either.

I do.

Missouri's offense is incredibly efficient. It can be contained by long teams with speed, but there aren't a lot of teams out there that have that.

MU's offense may not match up well against a team like North Carolina or Syracuse, but against 90% of the teams in the nation, that offense is absolutely going to hum. There are just too many guys that can score and pass.

And like I said, defensively I'm just losing quite a bit of confidence in them. Their defense started to slip about 6 weeks ago and it's just been looking progressively worse. Even if I don't see them as being 1 and 57, I absolutely see them as being top 10 and outside the top 50 respectively.

It's not been a very good defensive team for some time now.

Valiant 02-06-2012 11:40 PM

Good win.. I was thinking this was a slip game after the KU win.. Way to go on the road and pull out a victory..

KcMizzou 02-06-2012 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valiant (Post 8355202)
Good win.. I was thinking this was a slip game after the KU win.. Way to go on the road and pull out a victory..

And really, that's all that matters. These guys swept KSU, who thumped us at their place. They were ready to play... and we survived it and got a win. Job well done. 22-2

duncan_idaho 02-07-2012 09:06 AM

I think the defense is slipping because they're playing more conference teams.

Conference teams, in addition to being more talented, also scout Missouri much harder than say, Villanova or California, are able to. They dedicate a coach to scout them, and there is more tape to scout. That scouting plays a big factor.

Another part of the problem is that, because Missouri is so undersized, it has to double in the post in a lot of situations it normally would not. Teams that pass properly out of those double-teams are going to be able to find an open shot somewhere on the floor.

I also think the defense at the point (from Pressey) has not been quite as good or consistent as it was earlier. He seems to be reaching more and moving his feet less, which obviously is not a good combo. Also, because of his size deficiency, Phil is going to have some physical problems keeping guys contained. Basically, if a guy can get a half-step in one direction on Pressey, he has a really tough time recovering. He needs to focus more on staying in front.

kepp 02-07-2012 09:34 AM

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncb/boxscore?gameId=320370201

We attempted 21 (!!) 3-pointers, hitting 33%. All this while Ratliffe was 6 for 6 inside. We need to be smarter.

mnchiefsguy 02-07-2012 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 8355553)
http://scores.espn.go.com/ncb/boxscore?gameId=320370201

We attempted 21 (!!) 3-pointers, hitting 33%. All this while Ratliffe was 6 for 6 inside. We need to be smarter.

I agree. And late in the game we need to pass the ball around some more instead of dribbling near half court. We need to execute better and get some baskets in those situations. Our offense is good enough to rotate the ball around, kill some clock, and still get a good quality shot in those situations.

FishingRod 02-07-2012 12:34 PM

Was too busy to get into any of the MU-KU poop throwing yesterday so, I thought I would stop by and give a tip of the cap from a KU fan. Great game Saturday. Other than the final score It was about as good of a game as I have seen in a very long time. Likewise any road game in conference other than TT is a good win. So good win last night against an OU team that just wouldn’t go away. Again congrats and I am looking forward to the Rematch in Lawrence and hopefully one more time in the Big 12 tournament.

Dartgod 02-07-2012 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FishingRod (Post 8356105)
Was too busy to get into any of the MU-KU poop throwing yesterday so, I thought I would stop by and give a tip of the cap from a KU fan. Great game Saturday. Other than the final score It was about as good of a game as I have seen in a very long time. Likewise any road game in conference other than TT is a good win. So good win last night against an OU team that just wouldn’t go away. Again congrats and I am looking forward to the Rematch in Lawrence and hopefully one more time in the Big 12 tournament.

You're just conditioned to be nice because your wife is an MU fan. :p

Dr. Gigglepants 02-07-2012 12:47 PM

Dumb question: if we beat KU in Lawrence but still finish with the same conference record, would we get the regular season title due to the sweep?
Posted via Mobile Device

Molitoth 02-07-2012 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Gigglepants (Post 8356154)
Dumb question: if we beat KU in Lawrence but still finish with the same conference record, would we get the regular season title due to the sweep?
Posted via Mobile Device

Yes, MU would own the tiebreaker with the head to head wins.

KC_Connection 02-07-2012 12:52 PM

Both teams get a share of the title in that situation, by the way. MU would simply be the #1 seed in the B12 tournament due to the tiebreaker.

DJ's left nut 02-07-2012 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 8356169)
Both teams get a share of the title in that situation, by the way. MU would simply be the #1 seed in the B12 tournament due to the tiebreaker.

Oh believe you me, kiddos - KU would absolutely claim a share of the IIX title, even if MU beat them twice.

Gotta keep that streak intact.

Dr. Gigglepants 02-07-2012 12:56 PM

Does anyone dare to challenge KCC's contention here?
Posted via Mobile Device

mnchiefsguy 02-07-2012 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 8356185)
Oh believe you me, kiddos - KU would absolutely claim a share of the IIX title, even if MU beat them twice.

Gotta keep that streak intact.

They already have done that. A couple of years they split with Texas for the regular season title, and I think at least one of those times Texas was the #1 seed in the tourney.

But ku does not care about regular season titles. They mean nothing in their trophy case.

KC_Connection 02-07-2012 01:05 PM

It's not about "claiming" anything. They'd get a share. Texas beat KU in the 2008 NC year in the one reg. season game they played and they both shared the title (with Texas getting the #1 seed in the B12 tournament).

mnchiefsguy 02-07-2012 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 8356234)
It's not about "claiming" anything. They'd get a share. Texas beat KU in the 2008 NC year in the one reg. season game they played and they both shared the title (with Texas getting the #1 seed in the B12 tournament).

Whatever. The Chiefs tied with Seattle for the best record in the AFC west back in Gunther's first year as coach. Seattle won the tie breaker and went to the playoffs. I don't know any Chiefs fans that claim a "share" of the AFC West title that year.


Besides, according to Wickedson, regular season titles don't mean anything. Yall don't have enough room in your trophy case for one anyways, so I would not worry about it.

KC_Connection 02-07-2012 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8356243)
Whatever. The Chiefs tied with Seattle for the best record in the AFC west back in Gunther's first year as coach. Seattle won the tie breaker and went to the playoffs. I don't know any Chiefs fans that claim a "share" of the AFC West title that year.

I'm just telling you guys the way it works, not making a value judgment about it.

Quote:

Besides, according to Wickedson, regular season titles don't mean anything. Yall don't have enough room in your trophy case for one anyways, so I would not worry about it.
League dominance always means something.

mnchiefsguy 02-07-2012 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 8356250)
I'm just telling you guys the way it works, not making a value judgment about it.


League dominance always means something.

Hey, I would be proud of winning/sharing that many titles in a row. You should be. Was just pointing out that Wickedson believes ku is above all that, that they only care about final four's and national championships.

Bearcat 02-07-2012 01:39 PM

Here's an idea... when someone disagrees with what one rival fan says, instead of the passive aggressive bullshit and blanket statements and letting them live under your skin, why not just laugh at them and move on?

Some of you guys create so much drama, I feel like I should be posting from a high school cafeteria.

luv 02-07-2012 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 8356367)
Here's an idea... when someone disagrees with what one rival fan says, instead of the passive aggressive bullshit and blanket statements and letting them live under your skin, why not just laugh at them and move on?

Some of you guys create so much drama, I feel like I should be posting from a high school cafeteria.

I'm amazed at how much high school is actually like real life work and online environments.

FishingRod 02-07-2012 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 8356124)
You're just conditioned to be nice because your wife is an MU fan. :p

Ya got that right. I can live with the Loss on Sat because she knows you guys still have to come to Lawrence but, great jebus if we don't win that one I will have to move out of the country.

Bearcat 02-07-2012 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv (Post 8356383)
I'm amazed at how much high school is actually like real life work and online environments.

A lot of people never leave... and I've had some interesting conversations about it.

I haven't noticed it at my past few jobs, but I know it's out there.... one reason I listen to my iPod all day.

luv 02-07-2012 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 8356452)
A lot of people never leave... and I've had some interesting conversations about it.

I haven't noticed it at my past few jobs, but I know it's out there.... one reason I listen to my iPod all day.

I like working in a small office, and the age difference helps. Three attorneys old enough to be my dad, and then the paralegal and I are late and mid thirties respectively.

Bearcat 02-07-2012 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv (Post 8356491)
I like working in a small office, and the age difference helps. Three attorneys old enough to be my dad, and then the paralegal and I are late and mid thirties respectively.

I'd be surprised if you felt like it was high school... I guess there's a better chance of gossip in a small office, but I wouldn't expect much of it in a law office. I hear about office drama from female friends, but the first few that come to mind work in an area with more females than males, so it's not that unexpected (and it used to be unexpected here, on a male dominated board, but like I said, a whole lot of people never leave...).

Pitt Gorilla 02-07-2012 02:32 PM

Nice article from PowerMizzou:

From Regional to National

http://missouri.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1328630

It's a phrase that makes some sports writers cringe, but former Missouri football players see it everywhere they go.

Weatherspoon said the Mizzou Brand has more of a presence in Georgia.
Over the past year, athletic director Mike Alden has made a point to emphasize the "Mizzou Brand." Just Sunday, in a letter to fans following Missouri's 74-71 win over to Kansas, Alden talked about the brand in relation to the national exposure Missouri received over the past week:

"In each of these examples, we have an opportunity to present our 'brand'," Alden wrote. "Not just the black and gold, but those characteristics of Mizzou that make us such a special community."

Whether you see that turn-of-phrase as marketing talk or not, it hasn't gone unnoticed by current NFL Tigers. On Saturday, nine former Missouri football players returned to Columbia to be honored at halftime. All nine players left Columbia between 2008 and 2010, and were key members during the most successful run in Missouri football history.

One such player is current Atlanta Falcons' linebacker Sean Weatherspoon. After living in Georgia for the past two years, Weatherspoon said Missouri's national recognition is obvious.

"That's what we're really looking for at Mizzou," Weatherspoon said. "You've gotta get it out there. We've been regional, but it's time for the whole country to know about Mizzou. You can definitely sense it, because obviously the basketball team's been doing great, the football team's been doing great. There's a lot of great things goung on around here, and we're going to keep it that way."

Missouri has had plenty of opportunities to make waves on a national scale over the past six months. First, there was the move to the SEC that dominated headlines. Then, it was the signing of the nation's top football recruit, Dorial Green-Beckham. And, in front of a national television audience, Missouri's thrilling win over Kansas kept the Tigers in the national conversation.

Despite the rise of the "Mizzou Brand" from regional to national, Weatherspoon said there's no danger of Missouri getting too big for its britches.

"It doesn't feel any different at all (to come back)," Weatherspoon said. "It's still family. There's still a lot of love in here, obviously, as you can see."

Saul Good 02-07-2012 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 8353318)
If Baylor wins out(except for ISU), and Iowa State wins out... Big12 is ours! :)

How's that working out for you?

KcMizzou 02-07-2012 08:46 PM

http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...75387776_n.jpg

English and Ratliffe after Pledger missed the shot to tie last night. Class.

Saul Good 02-07-2012 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 8357488)
http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...75387776_n.jpg

English and Ratliffe after Pledger missed the shot to tie last night. Class.

Thats only because they didn't see him pose after shooting it. He obviously thought it was good.

O.city 02-07-2012 08:49 PM

I thought it was good too. It looked good when they showed the back view, just caught to much front rim.

KcMizzou 02-08-2012 08:07 PM

Friggin' Baylor. They really are as soft as advertised. We'd better beat them Saturday. Scarey on paper, but it seems like if you kick 'em in the teeth they'll just roll over. I hope the crowd is jacked... it's a HUGE game. Gotta keep pace.

GottliebShow Doug Gottlieb
Baylor is easily the best AAU team in college hoops #respect #sarcasm

KcMizzou 02-08-2012 08:09 PM

cdotharrison Carrington Harrison
Think if Mike Anderson had actually tried to recruit Otto Porter.

:grr:

KC_Connection 02-08-2012 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 8359782)
cdotharrison Carrington Harrison
Think if Mike Anderson had actually tried to recruit Otto Porter.

:grr:

Wish KU had gotten him. He's great. They're playing scrubs like Wesley in the spot that he would have played in.

Saul Good 02-08-2012 08:17 PM

Porter missed a FT at the end of regulation that would have given them the win over Syracuse. Syracuse won in OT.

KC_Connection 02-08-2012 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8359800)
Porter missed a FT at the end of regulation that would have given them the win over Syracuse. Syracuse won in OT.

Still better than Wesley.

O.city 02-08-2012 08:18 PM

Anderson really screwed the Tigers in recruiting this year.

He could have had Bradley Beal, McLemore, Porter and Tony Mitchell as a sophmore.

Saul Good 02-08-2012 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8359802)
Anderson really screwed the Tigers in recruiting this year.

He could have had Bradley Beal, McLemore, Porter and Tony Mitchell as a sophmore.

Mitchell wasn't his fault, but yeah. **** that guy. Arkansas is 0 for the season on the road, and they're down 25 at Georgia 5 minutes into the second half.

mnchiefsguy 02-08-2012 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 8359774)
Friggin' Baylor. They really are as soft as advertised. We'd better beat them Saturday. Scarey on paper, but it seems like if you kick 'em in the teeth they'll just roll over. I hope the crowd is jacked... it's a HUGE game. Gotta keep pace.

GottliebShow Doug Gottlieb
Baylor is easily the best AAU team in college hoops #respect #sarcasm

Yep, I think Mizzou needs to start fast. If Baylor gets down early, in a hostile arena with a stoked crowd, I think they will fold up pretty fast.

Still not going to be an easy game, though.

Saul Good 02-08-2012 08:25 PM

Baylor beats up on inferior teams but can't beat the really good teams. It's just what they do.

Dr. Johnny Fever 02-08-2012 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8359814)
Yep, I think Mizzou needs to start fast. If Baylor gets down early, in a hostile arena with a stoked crowd, I think they will fold up pretty fast.

Still not going to be an easy game, though.

I'll repeat what an MU fan said in the KU thread tonight... Baylor is too thuggish and stupid to beat (KU) MU. I expect you guys to roll over them.

KC_Connection 02-08-2012 08:38 PM

Considering MU beat them on the road, I would expect them to do it at home. They're just better. Baylor's obviously still talented enough to beat anybody, though...it will just take a lot of effort.

Saul Good 02-08-2012 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8305109)
Drew is a poor man's Calipari. He goes after top talent and sells them on showcasing themselves in a "dribble-drive" system (which is really just playing 1 on 1) instead of winning.

It always ends the same way. When they can overwhelm an opponent with talent, they win and look great doing it. When they run into a talented team that plays well together, they fold at the first sign of adversity and suddenly turn into 5 guys just trying to get theirs. 22 points on 6-21 shooting in a 16 point loss just means they scored 22 points, and that's all that matters to those guys. Lacedarius Dunn was the master of that, and now Drew has a whole team of guys with that mentality. That can work when you have NBA talent 7 deep with 4 lottery picks, but Baylor isn't there.

Still holds true.

KC_Connection 02-08-2012 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8359842)
Still holds true.

Perry Jones wasn't even trying to get his tonight...he was just floating around. It's true that they don't really play like an effective team.

KcMizzou 02-08-2012 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 8359839)
Considering MU beat them on the road, I would expect them to do it at home. They're just better. Baylor's obviously still talented enough to beat anybody, though...it will just take a lot of effort.

The biggest concern is them actually feeling some urgency, a sense of desperation, and playing hard for 40 minutes for once. Sounds unlikely, but it could happen....lol

We do know that whether Mizzou plays well or not... they'll fight their asses off.

Saul Good 02-08-2012 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 8359843)
Perry Jones wasn't even trying to get his tonight...he was just floating around. It's true that they don't really play like an effective team.

Jones is the opposite. He just quits.

Bearcat 02-08-2012 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8359842)
Still holds true.

Exactly.

KcMizzou 02-08-2012 09:15 PM

YahooForde Pat Forde
Arkansas sent message to Selection Committee tonight: Nevermind. We'll take our NIT bid and like it.

KcMizzou 02-08-2012 09:18 PM

Englishscope24 Kim English
"You don't accept in a win, what you would not tolerate in a loss". This approach has been huge for us this year. #Accountability.

KcMizzou 02-08-2012 09:19 PM

Sorry for all the twitter stuff, but this one was news to me.... Cool.

Englishscope24 Kim English
Congrats to @DeMarreCarroll1 for inking deal with the Utah #Jazz

Saul Good 02-08-2012 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 8359893)
YahooForde Pat Forde
Arkansas sent message to Selection Committee tonight: Nevermind. We'll take our NIT bid and like it.

16-1 at home. 0-7 on the road.

KcMizzou 02-08-2012 09:27 PM

Englishscope24 Kim English
Frank Haith is our coach. May not be responsible for the "players" you see on the court. But he IS the reason for the "PRODUCT" on the court

Englishscope24 Kim English
No other coach could've done a better job with this group of guys this season. System, philosophy, personality all were a perfect fit!

Englishscope24 Kim English
Please don't get it twisted whose "players" we are. We are Frank Haith's "Players"!!!

Dr. Johnny Fever 02-08-2012 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 8359925)
Englishscope24 Kim English
Frank Haith is our coach. May not be responsible for the "players" you see on the court. But he IS the reason for the "PRODUCT" on the court

Englishscope24 Kim English
No other coach could've done a better job with this group of guys this season. System, philosophy, personality all were a perfect fit!

Englishscope24 Kim English
Please don't get it twisted whose "players" we are. We are Frank Haith's "Players"!!!

Ya know you could feel this kind of joy and hope every year if you'd just switch over to....... nah forget it.

:p


/end trolling

KcMizzou 02-08-2012 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. noonanbeermefever (Post 8359943)
Ya know you could feel this kind of joy and hope every year if you'd just switch over to....... nah forget it.

:p


/end trolling

Heheh... simply not an option.

mnchiefsguy 02-08-2012 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 8359893)
YahooForde Pat Forde
Arkansas sent message to Selection Committee tonight: Nevermind. We'll take our NIT bid and like it.

What happened to ARK tonight? Who did they lose too?

KcMizzou 02-08-2012 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8360011)
What happened to ARK tonight? Who did they lose too?

Georgia 81-59

(Georgia's now 11-12 2-7 in the SEC)

mnchiefsguy 02-08-2012 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 8360014)
Georgia 81-59

(Georgia's now 11-12 2-7 in the SEC)

Ouch. Oh well, couldn't have happened to a nicer bunch of guys!

Dr. Johnny Fever 02-08-2012 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 8359957)
Heheh... simply not an option.

Which is part of why I can respect you. Hate my team all you want but be true to yours.

KcMizzou 02-08-2012 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8360021)
Ouch. Oh well, couldn't have happened to a nicer bunch of guys!

Yeah, I really liked Mike Anderson. For a while there, I was all in... but that last season he was here was just a mess. I'm glad he's gone, and look forward to playing his teams.

It's nice to see Mizzou run an actual offense.

Between him and the DGB thing, we've got some seeds planted for a rivalry.

KcMizzou 02-08-2012 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. noonanbeermefever (Post 8360022)
Which is part of why I can respect you. Hate my team all you want but be true to yours.

That's just how it should be. For me, my favorite teams (Chiefs, Mizzou, Royals) are just like family. Sometimes they piss me off, but I still love 'em. There is no quitting, or switching teams.

Dr. Johnny Fever 02-08-2012 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 8360044)
That's just how it should be. For me, my favorite teams (Chiefs, Mizzou, Royals) are just like family. Sometimes they piss me off, but I still love 'em. There is no quitting, or switching teams.

Exactly. I have no choice in the matter. My teams are all part of who I am. If all 3 went winless I'd look forward to the next season.

mnchiefsguy 02-08-2012 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 8360029)
Yeah, I really liked Mike Anderson. For a while there, I was all in... but that last season he was here was just a mess. I'm glad he's gone, and look forward to playing his teams.

It's nice to see Mizzou run an actual offense.

Between him and the DGB thing, we've got some seeds planted for a rivalry.

I liked Anderson too. That is probably why I hate him now. He brought Mizzou back from the cluster **** that was Quin Snyder, and then he ups and leaves. I understand him leaving for the Arkansas job, but he left the cupboard completely bare when he did, and that pissed me off more than anything. The way he left was completely unprofessional.

KcMizzou 02-08-2012 10:21 PM

The fact that the team is so much better under a new coach (who nobody wanted) just makes it easier to like the fact that he's gone.

Those tweets from English say a LOT. Under Haith, he's a different player... and this is a different team. It just lends a ton of credence to the idea that Mike Anderson knew what he was going to do (Arkansas) and wasn't all that into it.

Dr. Johnny Fever 02-08-2012 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 8360088)
The fact that the team is so much better under a new coach (who nobody wanted) just makes it easier to like the fact that he's gone.

Those tweets from English say a LOT. Under Haith, he's a different player... and this is a different team. It just lends a ton of credence to the idea that Mike Anderson knew what he was going to do (Arkansas) and wasn't all that into it.

So is Haith the man to keep MU at this level? I know nothing about his recruiting ability but this season sure isn't going to hurt him.

KcMizzou 02-08-2012 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. noonanbeermefever (Post 8360097)
So is Haith the man to keep MU at this level? I know nothing about his recruiting ability but this season sure isn't going to hurt him.

Coming in everybody hated the hire because they thought he couldn't coach. (Not an X's and O's guy) Supposedly his strength was recruiting. And I can see why... he's a charismatic dude.

mnchiefsguy 02-08-2012 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 8360088)
The fact that the team is so much better under a new coach (who nobody wanted) just makes it easier to like the fact that he's gone.

Those tweets from English say a LOT. Under Haith, he's a different player... and this is a different team. It just lends a ton of credence to the idea that Mike Anderson knew what he was going to do (Arkansas) and wasn't all that into it.

Yeah, I think he knew the Arkansas job was going to be open before the season even started. It is pretty obvious he gave up on Mizzou early, given how his recruiting dropped off last season.

In the end though, him leaving might turn out to be best thing to happen for Mizzou basketball in a long, long, time.

KcMizzou 02-08-2012 10:30 PM

He's shocked everyone by coaching a short, thin Mizzou team to where they are now.

The one thing he had on his side was experience. This is an experienced roster that's been through some battles.

Ebolapox 02-08-2012 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 8360113)
Coming in everybody hated the hire because they thought he couldn't coach. (Not an X's and O's guy) Supposedly his strength was recruiting. And I can see why... he's a charismatic dude.

haithers gonna haith.

TrebMaxx 02-08-2012 10:37 PM

I think the assistant coaches that Haith brought in didn't hurt either and deserve some credit. So far so good.

mnchiefsguy 02-08-2012 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrebMaxx (Post 8360137)
I think the assistant coaches that Haith brought in didn't hurt either and deserve some credit. So far so good.

The entire coaching staff deserves credit, to be sure. Haith chose his assistant coaches well.

ROYC75 02-09-2012 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 8360121)
He's shocked everyone by coaching a short, thin Mizzou team to where they are now.

The one thing he had on his side was experience. This is an experienced roster that's been through some battles.


He has taken what strength MU had and maxed it out, quick talented kids and taught them not to beat themselves with turnovers. Maximizing their processions and making FT's, contesting each shot and getting to as many loose balls as possible.

MU does all the little things well, probably better than anybody in the country since they are so short on size.

This makes MU capable of beating anybody, anyplace at anytime.

O.city 02-10-2012 06:54 PM

Big game for the Tigers tomorrow.


I figure it's close for a while, but Mizzou turns Baylor over and they quit.

Ebolapox 02-10-2012 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROYC75 (Post 8360296)
He has taken what strength MU had and maxed it out, quick talented kids and taught them not to beat themselves with turnovers. Maximizing their processions and making FT's, contesting each shot and getting to as many loose balls as possible.

MU does all the little things well, probably better than anybody in the country since they are so short on size.

This makes MU capable of beating anybody, anyplace at anytime.

holy ****, a non-biased and level-headed post by royII! shit, the mayans were right :sulk:

Pasta Little Brioni 02-10-2012 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by H5N1 (Post 8364351)
holy ****, a non-biased and level-headed post by royII! shit, the mayans were right :sulk:

That wasn't Roy, it was Rich Scanlon accidently logged on to Roy's account :p

O.city 02-10-2012 07:03 PM

How are you guys feeling about the game tomorrow?

mnchiefsguy 02-10-2012 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8364359)
How are you guys feeling about the game tomorrow?

Feel pretty good, but it still will be a tough game. I think the crowd will be fired up, and Mizzou will use that advantage early on in the game. I am hoping that when Mizzou pounces on Baylor early, that the Bears will fold and give up.

Game of the Year for Mizzou tomorrow. Of course, every game is game of the year when you are neck and neck down the stretch for a conference title.

O.city 02-10-2012 09:14 PM

I don't see the Paige being like it was last weekend, but it might not ever be at that level again.

I am anxious to see how Baylor comes out. If they play like they did in the second half Wed. I'd look for MU to have a fairly easy win.

I didn't watch the game in Waco but it seemed from what I heard that MU controlled the game. I think this is a must win for MU, being at home.

KcMizzou 02-10-2012 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8364571)
I don't see the Paige being like it was last weekend, but it might not ever be at that level again.

I am anxious to see how Baylor comes out. If they play like they did in the second half Wed. I'd look for MU to have a fairly easy win.

I didn't watch the game in Waco but it seemed from what I heard that MU controlled the game. I think this is a must win for MU, being at home.

"The Paige" :grr:

Mizzou was up by 8-10 throughout most of the second half. It was a lot like KU @ Mizzou, other than the fact that Mizzou kept a big enough cushion to make Bayor's last second 3 harmless.

Honestly, I'm a little nervous about this game, but I like this team... and I love them at home. We'll see how it goes.

KcMizzou 02-10-2012 09:31 PM

We do need the crowd to be a factor.

O.city 02-10-2012 09:34 PM

I think it will be a close game for a while. If baylor plays soft, which they normally do, MU should win.

O.city 02-10-2012 09:43 PM

I wouldn't be surprised to see Baylor come out strong tho.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.