![]() |
The Frank Clark ride needs to end
|
Quote:
I really don’t care as long as they keep drafting developmental players that produce on DL like Danna and Karlaftis. |
Quote:
|
Myles Garrett got 5/125 with 100 guaranteed with only 1 playoff sack.
TJ Watt got 4/112 with 80 guaranteed with only 1 playoff sack. Frank Clark should get something like 4/345 with 260 guaranteed with 13 playoff sacks. |
No. Just no guys. No.
|
I'd bring him back.
$1m base salary. $1m per sack. You wanna get paid? Produce. I'm kidding. Sort of. |
Quote:
Probably best to resign yourself to this fact. At some point the organization determined that 2 good games and 'a mental edge' are more important than the 17 games of nothing we'll for the rest of the year. My hope at this point is that we've seen the last of the Chiefs believing he's a guy that can/should play 65-70% of the snaps in a game and instead look for a replacement RDE1 and have Clark move into that Dunlap role as a rotational guy. If he played for any other team in the league, that's probably how we'd view him. A "hey, let's take a cheap flyer on this guy and see if he can help us in the playoffs!" sort of guy. I mean there's just no way we'd be looking to give this guy a multi-year deal for 8 figures annually coming from, say, LA. |
Quote:
Grade out to a 90 in coverage? $9 million. Set 10 edges? $500k bonus. |
Brown Jr and Jones will both get extensions IMO. That will drastically lower their caps hit in 2023 to free up quite a bit of cap space.
I have to wonder if they just don’t touch Frank’s contract and let him have on more year. I’m sure folks here will like that bc tinkering with it likely means more dead money in 2024 instead of him just being off the books. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
These are the options. A. Pay the $28 million in 2023 then he’s off the books B. Restructure again with lower cap hit in 2023 but you’re still paying him basically the difference in money in 2024. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You don't have to restructure a damn thing. And you aren't paying him 'basically the same money'. You cut him and clear $20 million from your books. Worry about the rest later. Jesus - 'don't touch his contract'? Are you insane? |
Quote:
"Eh, just leave his contract untouched..." Because evidently we have to pay him $30 million at some point anyway? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
They aren’t cutting him DJ. Come on. We know that’s not happening. Best to just accept it now.
Last year they stared at a $26.3 million cap hit from him for this season and drug the can down an extra year to lower his cap hit to $13.2 million this year and $7.6 million in dead money in 2023 if they cut him. Since we are pretty damn sure they aren’t cutting him, I guess it’s a lose/lose for you. Either pay him that big cap hit one more year or deal with his dead money in 2025. Not unless they can work magic to somehow restructure to lower the 2023 cap hit and keep it at 1 more year. Doesn’t sound likely |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Just exactly how much leverage do you think he has here? 'Magic' ain't necessary - an abacus should do just fine. |
Quote:
If they keep Clark at a cap hit of $28.675 million (which is more than Chris Jones)....then ****ing fire Veach because he's ****ing reeruned. |
He's got a prorated bonus of $7.675 million that they're on the hook for either way. His base salary is $20.5 million...none of it guaranteed.
He can either accept a pay cut down to a base salary of $4.5 million or he can kick rocks. That would move his cap hit down to $12.675 million. |
Quote:
The 'dead money' he's talking about doesn't exist. $9 million of it does, but it's on next year's cap one way or the other. Keep him, cut him - it's there. That was the trade-off and the argument I had with the "he costs the same" crowd last season. There's NOTHING that can be done to change that. The other $21 million is just fake money. It doesn't exist unless we pay it. There's no 'dead money' there that needs to be spread into subsequent years and there's ZERO chance the Chiefs elect to give the guy a $21 million base salary next year. He'll play on a salary commensurate with his full-season contributions (with a nod to his performance in the playoffs) or he's gone. This is just silly. With $21 million in non-guaranteed money, you might as well view the guy as a free agent and consider his possible contract terms accordingly. That dollar figure means NOTHING. |
Quote:
|
Got take:
Veach will get a 3rd round pick for Frank. I’m looking at you, Jacksonville…or the Giants. |
When you think of all the great pass rushers in the history of the game, it is amazing to think that Clark is currently sitting in 3rd place for postseason sacks. 1 in the Super Bowl and he is tied with Bruce Smith.
If Clark is released and then re-signs with a contender he could easily break the record. https://www.pro-football-reference.c...r_playoffs.htm |
Quote:
And NOBODY is trading for Frank Clark. They just won't. Because ultimately nobody is going to pay the guy $20 million in base salary next year. And that's the contract you'd be trading for. |
Quote:
And there's not a team in football more likely to make the playoffs every year for the next 3 years than KC. So he's going to stay. But he's not going to refuse to restructure and he's going to restructure in the same manner he did last year. the notable distinction being that there's no more real dead money to push out so it's less of a restructure (though that's how it will be discussed) than it is a cut/re-sign scenario. I'm guessing Franchise is probably about right on where he ends up. $4-6 million in base with incentives that can get him about twice that. It won't create any 'dead money' because even if there's a face or cap saving mechanism whereby some of his outlay is rolled into 2024, most of it will be in the form of additional non-guaranteed dollars just like last season. |
Quote:
Karlaftis Danna Clark ?? ?? If they do decided to just part ways with him, then I'd hope they would find a way to bring back Dunlap for another one year deal. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
As long as he’s somewhat cheap and helps out in the postseason, I guess it works. We just have to accept what this is. After all of the years of key guys disappearing in the postseason, we now have the exact opposite. He’s basically an NBA player who has found his own load management schedule without telling anyone. |
Quote:
All I know is if we have to do what we did last year with Frank we’ll never hear the end of this from DJ LMAO |
Quote:
If you're of the 'better to move on from a guy a year early than a year late' school, the time to get out of the Frank Clark game is probably now. |
Quote:
Then draft WR, OT and DT. |
Quote:
Nonexistent regular season. Battles injuries and illness all year. 4.5 sacks in the regular season. 2+ sacks every postseason. Puts the post season sack record completely out of reach forever with like 35. It would look like whenever you look up NBA stats and see Wilt Chamberlain at the top. |
Davenport is exactly the type of player that a team with money spends big on to try to get back on track.
Randy Gregory was a brokedick who had a career high of 6 sacks and 1 dumb team gave him $14 million/ year while his old team came close to that. Figure someone will offer more than that for Davenport |
I don't love the idea of brigning him back, again, at anything of significance. Definitely not something that's structured to actually pay him 8 digit AAV.
He's a $7.5M dead cap hit next year. If they can do something that has an easy out after the $23 season and significantly cuts his cap number while being nearly neutral compared to his dead cap hit, I'm not against that idea. Something that adds 3-4M to his 2023 dead cap total is probably something that you can live with, as long as you're supplementing DE in the draft again and plannign to walk away. Is there a deal there that makes sense for Clark, though? That's hard to find and get to. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Frank Clark said Andy Reid is a real father figure to him since he lost his own father in a house fire a few years ago.<br><br>Said he spends a lot of time with Andy and their conversations have brought them real close.<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a></p>— PJ Green (@PJGreenTV) <a href="https://twitter.com/PJGreenTV/status/1621214846246158344?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 2, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
How many more postseason sacks he need to be all time leader?
|
Quote:
incredibly tribute to damar hamlin coming |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Watching his presser today and I really feel like he has changed (personally) this year. He seems much more - thoughtful, calm, collected, focused, humble - he talked about losing his father last year and how close he has become to Andy as a father figure and talking about life. Talked about making mistakes and learning from them. Haven't really seen a lot of him in pressers this year but from what I remember from the ones in the past this is a very different Frank Clark.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/OhmnuecCpmE?start=1699" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Um, ya know?
|
Quote:
|
you could tell he didn't give a shit last year
he's zen as **** now |
Quote:
With that said, I will be wearing a Frank Clark shirt to the Super Bowl, boys! |
Looking back in hindsight, just theorizing here of course, but i wonder if he's physically just rounding into form.
Lets be fair here, he DID look skinny during TC. He looked like he lost muscle during his attempt to lose weight. It could be possible that he's simply physically in a better place than he was to start the season. |
Quote:
|
TwistedChiefs is God.
All knowing, all seeing. |
Getting off the alcohol + losing weight + contract year + Joe Cullens = Prime Frank Clark.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Unlikely they cut bait. Will probably be looking at a restructure and drafting his developmental replacement on day two.
I'm also not keen on picking up his replacement in FA either tbh. Waste of money. With the way Cullen coaches up our guys, just develop them the same way we are churning out CBs. On a side note, just based off positional needs of this team + draft capital this draft is going to be so ****ing exciting man. Especially if we lock up OBJ. We could theoretically do exactly what we did with the secondary last year and go buck wild picking rushing talent. |
this thread can only end in a super bowl mvp for frank clark as he gets three sacks and breaks the all-time postseason sack record
|
Quote:
regular season MVP Walter Payton man of the year Super Bowl MVP :clap: |
Quote:
and i have a weird feeling kelce or pacheco or chris get SB MVP the chiefs defense is on a ****ing roll and a 6-1 n00b ain't ready |
Quote:
https://www.nfl.com/news/2022-walter...inees-unveiled |
One of many that will be inducted into the KC Chiefs ROH.
We are going run out of room on each level. |
Quote:
But fire Veach? Come on, man. |
|
Frank Clark is 3rd all time in post season sacks and ALWAYS shows up big in the playoffs
why would you want to cut this guy ROFL |
Quote:
|
DJ and I have obviously spent a lot of time in this thread discussing Clark's improvement in coverage skills. It seems the rest of the world is finally starting to take notice:
https://www.dessertcravingtees.com/v...BoCvgEQAvD_BwE Clark Island anyone? Entirely possible a legendary SB performance - couple sacks while locking down AJ Brown - and he'll have a real case to make for Canton. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You win Super Bowls when you have an elite QB and a killer pass rush. Karlaftis is ready to go for double digit sacks. Jones is likely to be extended if you ask me. The Chiefs need one more bookend and he and Karlaftis will torture tackles for a decade. That bookend does not exist in free agency, really. The bookend you need is probably in Round 1 of the NFL Draft. (And truth be told, he's probably at West Point.) You're going to need that guy to have the best coaching available. He's going to get it with Joe Cullen, but Frank Clark plays an unmistakable part of that. Clark's tutelage has helped maximize Mike Danna beyond all of our expectations, and it's boosted Karlaftis' development. I think Clark's play in the postseason is really important, but the thing that's completely irreplaceable is how valuable he is in bringing up young guys. He may be a difficult human being, but he's beloved in that locker room and they completely feed off his energy. When Clark is popping, the entire DL plays incredibly loose. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Playoff Frank
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://media.tenor.com/cSay-_yeYKcA...urn-around.gif |
Quote:
|
Quote:
There's nothing Karlaftis is doing the past two months of this season that he can't replicate for the totality of the 2023 season. Karlaftis has been applying pressure all season, but he figured out how to convert that to sacks the final third of the season. He's turning corners sharper, his countermoves are more effective at keeping himself in the play. He was already a readymade NFL player when we drafted him, but Karlaftis' passrush is here. It has arrived. His run defense is not yet where it needs to be, but with his size and the coaching he's getting, it will be. |
Quote:
Quote:
To say nothing of the fact that, despite the fact that he's a difficult human being, he's beloved in the locker room. He's been a headache for the team off the field, but he hasn't brought any of it into the locker room like Mathieu did with the contract situation. And of course, as I said before and as we've all seen, once Clark heats up a bit in the game the entire DL responds. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.