![]() |
The Yankees and Astros concern me the most in the AL. The move today makes me feel much better about it. It just seems like we have the halos number.
|
While the Cardinals are 7-7 against the other AL Central teams, here is what they have done:
Cleveland W 2-0 +2 Detroit W 2-1 +1 Minnesota L 2-1 -1 White Sox L 2-1 -1 Cleveland L 2-1 -1 Minnesota L 3-1 -2 Minnesota W 3-2 +1 Minnesota W 3-2 +1 White Sox W 3-2 +1 Detroit L 4-3 -1 White Sox L 7-1 -6 Cleveland W 8-3 +5 White Sox W 8-5 +3 Detroit L 10-4 -6 Amazing two games skew the averages. |
Quote:
|
These are cool. Almost want one myself.
https://scontent-mia1-1.xx.fbcdn.net...61&oe=56558139 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Because of the Royals home park and the parks in the AL Central, they are a flyball pitcher heavy team. The Yankees and Astros both play in homer happy stadiums and have a lot of flyball hitters. Thus, when playing games in those parks, flyball pitchers can get exposed. The Royals, as a team, are also built around speed, contact and defense, things that do not have as big an impact against teams like that. This is why it's essential KC have homefield advantage in the AL playoff series and why the rotation needed reinforcements in the rotation that are better at missing bats. Cueto and healthy/right Duffy and Ventura change that equation quite a bit. The Angels, on the other hand, play in a normalized park very similar to the K. So the Royals' team construction isn't as vulnerable to exploitation. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Best record in baseball. Best record in inter league play. One of only 3 NL teams with a winning record against AL teams. Where are you getting your facts to base your opinion that we wouldn't even make the playoffs in the AL? |
Quote:
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...postcount=2132 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you are rating the Cardinal teams that made it to the postseason since 2000, here's how it would go, roughly: 2004 2005 2013 2002 2000 2001 2009 2011 2012 2006 Eight wins in a WS game from the bottom three teams. The rest combined for two, total, including none from the two best squads (by far) of this century. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.