ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft **** OFFICIAL 2016 NFL Draft Thread **** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=299568)

Strongside 04-28-2016 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 12202525)
...at a cost

A cost of moving down a few picks. Meh. I can see where people are angry, but let's be real here...people would be angry no matter what. We could have traded our 1st and 2nd to Green Bay for Aaron Rodgers and people would have lost their shit.

KChiefs1 04-28-2016 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MeatRock (Post 12202377)
Hey there's a bunch of medicals left with top tier talent. LMAO



Warts

TribalElder 04-28-2016 11:22 PM

http://www.kansascity.com/sports/spt...e74606812.html
LMAO

The Chiefs turned the NFL Draft into the feeling of being stood up on a first date

Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/sports/spt...#storylink=cpy

BryanBusby 04-28-2016 11:23 PM

Teams Drafts that I liked:
Cowboys (Elliot is going to be really ****ing good behind that line and may keep Romo alive for 16 games. RB is a shit position in the top 5, but really the top of this draft wasn't that good. Dallas can still nab a pass-rusher and DB Friday and slay this shit.)
Jaguars (Ramsay is a good pick but idk if I like him at CB over S)
Buccaneers (Think they got a steal)
Saints (Good pick)
Dolphins (Tunsil was a steal and now they aren't handcuffed to crippled Albert)
Lions (Stafford needs some help)
Colts (Grigson wants to keep his job finally I guess)
Redskins (Doctson is a hell of a pick)
Bengals (Filled a big need and stole a great player from a divisional rival)
Broncos (mother****ers)
Packers (A little early, but Clark fits the D well)
Cardinals (They bet on the weed guy)
Panthers (Butler will be a great addition)

Hated:
Rams (I don't see it with Goff)
Eagles (Or Wentz and the Eagles did all of this in a very reeruned fashion)
Chargers (Are they moving to a 4-3? Does he love learning a new Defense as much as he loves ecstasy?)
Ravens (They passed on a tackle with issues for a less talented tackle with issues)
Bears (They moved up for a thin underachiever. Uh.)
Giants (reeeeeaaaaaacccccccchhhhhhhhhhhhh)
Falcons (They could of had him tomorrow. Pioli is a ****ing reerun. Still.)
Texans (They landed captain dropsies)
Seahawks (They reached for a guy that Tom Cable will certainly **** up)
49ers (They passed on a QB, for another Duck because Chip has no idea what the **** is outside of the PAC-12 and not only took the lesser guard, but moved up to do this because idk?)
Jets (Lee is a cool player, but maybe they should of gone Offense in Round 1 for once considering I don't think they have since Sanchez? Who the **** is going to throw the football in New York?)

Meh:
Titans (Landing a nice haul of picks is always cool, but they gave up some of it to take a right tackle in the top 10 for some dumb ass reason)
Raiders (Good player, slight reach)
Browns (Hey landing more picks is always cool as hell, but who's going to throw the football when RG3 dies week 2? Not every team should trade down. Coleman was a good choice though)
Bills (Lawson was the most Rex Ryan thing and very meh)
Vikings (Position was right, value was alright but I think Treadwell is just meh)

Shitting pants stupid:
KC

Titty Meat 04-28-2016 11:25 PM

Stupid? I don't think so. We'll see if passive plays out just frustrating everything seems to work out for Denver.

Strongside 04-28-2016 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 12202533)
A cost of moving down a few picks. Meh. I can see where people are angry, but let's be real here...people would be angry no matter what. We could have traded our 1st and 2nd to Green Bay for Aaron Rodgers and people would have lost their shit.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 12202547)
Teams Drafts that I liked:
Cowboys (Elliot is going to be really ****ing good behind that line and may keep Romo alive for 16 games. RB is a shit position in the top 5, but really the top of this draft wasn't that good. Dallas can still nab a pass-rusher and DB Friday and slay this shit.)
Jaguars (Ramsay is a good pick but idk if I like him at CB over S)
Buccaneers (Think they got a steal)
Saints (Good pick)
Dolphins (Tunsil was a steal and now they aren't handcuffed to crippled Albert)
Lions (Stafford needs some help)
Colts (Grigson wants to keep his job finally I guess)
Redskins (Doctson is a hell of a pick)
Bengals (Filled a big need and stole a great player from a divisional rival)
Broncos (mother****ers)
Packers (A little early, but Clark fits the D well)
Cardinals (They bet on the weed guy)
Panthers (Butler will be a great addition)

Hated:
Rams (I don't see it with Goff)
Eagles (Or Wentz and the Eagles did all of this in a very reeruned fashion)
Chargers (Are they moving to a 4-3? Does he love learning a new Defense as much as he loves ecstasy?)
Ravens (They passed on a tackle with issues for a less talented tackle with issues)
Bears (They moved up for a thin underachiever. Uh.)
Giants (reeeeeaaaaaacccccccchhhhhhhhhhhhh)
Falcons (They could of had him tomorrow. Pioli is a ****ing reerun. Still.)
Texans (They landed captain dropsies)
Seahawks (They reached for a guy that Tom Cable will certainly **** up)
49ers (They passed on a QB, for another Duck because Chip has no idea what the **** is outside of the PAC-12 and not only took the lesser guard, but moved up to do this because idk?)
Jets (Lee is a cool player, but maybe they should of gone Offense in Round 1 for once considering I don't think they have since Sanchez? Who the **** is going to throw the football in New York?)

Meh:
Titans (Landing a nice haul of picks is always cool, but they gave up some of it to take a right tackle in the top 10 for some dumb ass reason)
Raiders (Good player, slight reach)
Browns (Hey landing more picks is always cool as hell, but who's going to throw the football when RG3 dies week 2? Not every team should trade down. Coleman was a good choice though)
Bills (Lawson was the most Rex Ryan thing and very meh)
Vikings (Position was right, value was alright but I think Treadwell is just meh)

Shitting pants stupid:
KC

Cool, thanks bud. You've really opened some eyes here. Super fresh content. You should go pro.

BryanBusby 04-28-2016 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside (Post 12202553)
Cool, thanks bud. You've really opened some eyes here. Super fresh content. You should go pro.

Woah dog, dripping hot take. You should host TMZ.

Keeping lapping up that pile of shit I guess. We could of slid down enough to miss out on all the high tier CB's for a 4th round pick that could get us a Special Teamer; man we're ****ing slaying it.

kcpasco 04-28-2016 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 12202525)
...at a cost

That's what happens when the commissioner decides to bend you over.

DenverChief 04-28-2016 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 12202568)
Woah dog, dripping hot take. You should host TMZ.

Keeping lapping up that pile of shit I guess. We could of slid down enough to miss out on all the high tier CB's for a 4th round pick that could get us a Special Teamer; man we're ****ing slaying it.

Says the guy with a Tyler ****ing Bray avatar :facepalm:

DenverChief 04-28-2016 11:52 PM

Boom

Quote:

The last time the Chiefs traded back in the first round, in 2011, they sent the 21st overall pick (which became defensive tackle Phil Taylor) to Cleveland for the No. 27 overall pick (which became receiver Jon Baldwin) and a third-rounder, which became linebacker Justin Houston.

Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/sports/nfl...#storylink=cpy

Titty Meat 04-28-2016 11:53 PM

Let's hope so DC. I think Whitehair is a 10 year starter in the league you pull that in the first few rounds that's a success.

RunKC 04-28-2016 11:57 PM

Trade Knile Davis to move up or garner a pick.

DenverChief 04-29-2016 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12202597)
Trade Knile Davis to move up or garner a pick.

I wouldn't be surprised if we trade him or DAT for a draft pick and use that pick along with one of the 9ers picks to move into the third.

saphojunkie 04-29-2016 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 12202600)
I wouldn't be surprised if we trade him or DAT for a draft pick and use that pick along with one of the 9ers picks to move into the third.

This is absolutely going to happen. I would have loved it if we just threw DAT into the SF trade, nixed the 6th rounder, and got their third instead of 4th.

DaneMcCloud 04-29-2016 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 12202601)
This is absolutely going to happen. I would have loved it if we just threw DAT into the SF trade, nixed the 6th rounder, and got their third instead of 4th.

They should be able to take SF's 4th and 6th to jump into the lower 3rd, if they so choose.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.