Originally Posted by jspchief

That team sucked top to bottom. How do you think they got Manning to begin with?

Manning's 28 INT's aren't any more to blame for those losses than the overall team around him is to blame for his INTs. They were 3-13 the year before, without his 28 INTs.

Originally Posted by jspchief

Yea, just ask Trent Green.

Originally Posted by Moooo

I think you'd be suprised at how poorly most rookie QBs perform. There's a reason they don't even allow any but the cream of the crop to do so, the others would be a JOKE. I bet you if Croyle were to start the first game this year, he would have maybe 1 TD and probably about 5 INTs.

And Peyton Manning if I'm not mistaken also had a low 70s QB rating. If that's good by your standards though...

Originally Posted by htismaqe

I didn't say the INT's were any MORE to blame.

Originally Posted by htismaqe

jspchief's question

What has Huard done in the last five years to make anyone believe he's worth a shit?

And this will be the third time I've answered YOUR question in THIS thread. I even quoted you once, not 25 minutes ago. ROFL

Originally Posted by htismaqe

No, not for me it's not.

The expectations CHANGE depending on whether Green's injury is short-term or long-term.

Originally Posted by jspchief

OK, let's put it in perspective. Do you think Manning would have played that poorly behind our O-line, with LJ at RB?

Originally Posted by milkman

I wouldn't be at all surprised by how poorly most rookie QBs perform.

The question I would raise is how many of those rookie QBs played on a team that wasn't among the league's cellar dwellers in rebuiling mode.

Big Ben is a guy that played on a team that wasn't, and he performed as well as any rookie QB.

In most cases, QBs that suck ass in their rookie year are usually on teams that suck ass.

Originally Posted by rad

:rolleyes:
Unfortunately, decisions have TO be MADE before THE season STARTS.

Originally Posted by rad

ROFL
It's JUST that YOU are being VAGUE in your POSITION.

DO you LIKE Huard OR just TOLERATE HIM?!?!><?":

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Umm, I believe that's why I suggested we keep Huard and Croyle and try to put Printers on the practice squad.

We address BOTH possible scenarios if we do that.

Originally Posted by rad

So you think Printers will last longer on the PS than Huard?

Or you don't want Printers on the Team?

Originally Posted by milkman

Huard can't be placed on the PS.

Pay attention nOOb!

Originally Posted by Laz

btw - it's the article that says "huard IS the #2 QB"


i don't think the writer knows this ...... hopefully the chiefs don't even know it yet.

i would hope the everyone (especially the chiefs) would wait until the players show what they can do in training camp and preseason before making their roster cuts.

Originally Posted by Laz

it basically means "we'll remember you said this........" :fire:


btw - it's the article that says "huard IS the #2 QB"


i don't think the writer knows this ...... hopefully the chiefs don't even know it yet.

i would hope the everyone (especially the chiefs) would wait until the players show what they can do in training camp and preseason before making their roster cuts.