yes...

If we did we may never had to live through the Herm years...

Decisions like this are why the Chiefs are the Chiefs....

A lot of teams probably should have taken Rodgers. And at the time, the team would have been killed if they drafted Rodgers over taking the "best player on the board" from Big XII country who people here had been salivating over.

I agree, the fact that we don't draft franchise difference players are why we are here today. The scarier thing is that Carl was salivating over the idea of drafting Joey Harrington a few years earlier (but Detroit took him which allowed us to throw away our pick anyway on Ryan Sims). It's scary how bad Carl was at evaluating young QB's...

He's not part of the right 53.

Rodgers in the Chiefs current offense wouldn't be much better than Cassel.

Honestly might be the dumbest thing you've ever said on here. That's saying something.

I'm surprised you didn't blame "Fat Scott" for it either.

Are your pussy U players ever going to toughen up again? It must piss you off to watch that Documentary and then watch the Molly Shannon-led U team use space heaters on the sideline for a 49 degree game.

Any good QB would be much better than Cassel. Does this mean that we'd win more games? Probably, but just a few.

Would the offense be far more productive? Of course. Because when you have a sack of ****ing shit QB, that kind of hampers things. Just like when we had a sack of shit RB, running the ball looked like a lost cause.

Statistically, we have damn near the worst QB in the league. FFS, of course it could be better.

Blackledge over marino,kelly,obrien this team has never drafted a good qb.

Every team could do this shit about every draft, every year.


nobody selects the guy they should every round ... you just gotta hope you get a few quality players each draft.

Never? Sort of.

That's the last time we tried. ****.

We're fans of one of the most pussy franchises in the ****ing league.

True.

But I don't think there's a single team with the history of the Chiefs that can lay claim to the fact that they have never, in franchise history, drafted and developed their own QB.

This is tough because at the time I thought Rodgers would be just another Tedford QB.

:spock:

Kevin Kietzman is generally a dumbass, so use this as the preface to my comment. However...

For years he's said that if you don't have a franchise QB and you're in the position to draft the player who is regarded as the best or second best QB in the draft, you absolutely have to do it.

Can't say I disagree.