ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Covitz: Eric Fisher still not cleared for full practice sessions (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=283957)

RunKC 05-29-2014 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 10657784)
And to the Marcelluses, RunKC's and Detoxings of the world, who of these Great Red Hopes have I been wrong about?

Of the picks I criticized heavily, here's the one I was wrong about: Dontari Poe.

Tyson Jackson? McCluster? Arenas? Alex Magee? Cassel?

Perhaps you need to stop blaming me for pissing in the Kool-Aid and figure out if the stank is from the dumb mother****ers mixing it with vinegar instead of water.

When the Chiefs make great selections like Berry and Houston, I praise them. When they go to war with stiffs like Mike Brown, Zach Thomas, or ****a I don't.

We've all seen how good franchises are run. This is not one of them. So perhaps, instead of bitching at other people who note reality, you should do what I did and refuse to subsidize the incompetence.

I don't know your history. All I know is that it's too soon to label players like Eric fisher a bust.

I will agree with you if he bombs this year, but he deserves his fair chance like any other player in that class.

O.city 05-29-2014 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10657846)
I don't know your history. All I know is that it's too soon to label players like Eric fisher a bust.

I will agree with you if he bombs this year, but he deserves his fair chance like any other player in that class.

Except Geno smith right?

saphojunkie 05-29-2014 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10657850)
Accept Geno smith right?

Is that like accepting Jesus?

Snapplez 05-29-2014 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 10657853)
Is that like accepting Jesus?

http://i.imgur.com/zqVZy.jpg

O.city 05-29-2014 11:59 AM

Fixed

In58men 05-29-2014 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 10657210)
LMAO Are you the Man that InMen is in?

JFC you're really annoying.

RunKC 05-29-2014 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10657850)
Except Geno smith right?

Who gives a shit about Geno? If you like him so much go cheer for the jets

In58men 05-29-2014 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10657570)
You even proudly changed your name to TrueFanDave, dude.

A moderate my ****ing ass.

ROFL


*crickets*

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-29-2014 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10656405)
It's more about his detraction against cases of homerism where the homerism is denied by the homers.

LMAO Immaculate turn of a phrase.

htismaqe 05-29-2014 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10657890)
Who gives a shit about Geno? If you like him so much go cheer for the jets

You've brought him up more than anybody else in this thread.

ToxSocks 05-29-2014 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 10657784)
And to the Marcelluses, RunKC's and Detoxings of the world, who of these Great Red Hopes have I been wrong about?

Of the picks I criticized heavily, here's the one I was wrong about: Dontari Poe.

Tyson Jackson? McCluster? Arenas? Alex Magee? Cassel?

Perhaps you need to stop blaming me for pissing in the Kool-Aid and figure out if the stank is from the dumb mother****ers mixing it with vinegar instead of water.

When the Chiefs make great selections like Berry and Houston, I praise them. When they go to war with stiffs like Mike Brown, Zach Thomas, or ****a I don't.

We've all seen how good franchises are run. This is not one of them. So perhaps, instead of bitching at other people who note reality, you should do what I did and refuse to subsidize the incompetence.

My post isn't referring to you being right or wrong, it's about whether or not you're being objective.

Your posts are rarely ever objective because the only time you really post is to do battle with homers. You remove objectivity in order to drive home your point.

I'll always remember a specific thread you made....it was after some preseason games iirc. I remember it because it was completely objective. It was rare. You didn't make it to argue with homers, you made it to have an objective analysis.

I was able to read it and go down the list

yup
yup
yup
yup
ehhh...i disagree
yup

It was a fantastic thread because it highlighted the negatives and positives, rather than just the negatives.

Most of the time, however, you simply post to call homers dumbasses. It's hard to call you objective when your sole purpose is to tell the sunshine and rainbow crowd that they're stupid. You get so hell bent on proving them wrong that your posts lose their objectivity.

BigMeatballDave 05-29-2014 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inmem58 (Post 10657896)
ROFL


*crickets*

I responded, you ****ing reerun.

You're reaching Blackbob dipshit levels.

'Hamas' Jenkins 05-29-2014 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 10658204)
My post isn't referring to you being right or wrong, it's about whether or not you're being objective.

Your posts are rarely ever objective because the only time you really post is to do battle with homers. You remove objectivity in order to drive home your point.

I'll always remember a specific thread you made....it was after some preseason games iirc. I remember it because it was completely objective. It was rare. You didn't make it to argue with homers, you made it to have an objective analysis.

I was able to read it and go down the list

yup
yup
yup
yup
ehhh...i disagree
yup

It was a fantastic thread because it highlighted the negatives and positives, rather than just the negatives.

Most of the time, however, you simply post to call homers dumbasses. It's hard to call you objective when your sole purpose is to tell the sunshine and rainbow crowd that they're stupid. You get so hell bent on proving them wrong that your posts lose their objectivity.

The homers are dumbasses. Look at the Royals threads here. Anyone who would say they think the Royals can turn it around and win 92 games this year would be labeled a dumbass. The Chiefs have the same level of incompetence, but similar levels of scorn are labeled as hating. Pointing that out does not make one subjective; it's stating facts.

There are dozens of posters on here who do exactly what Know Mo does, just with different laundry. That's the definition of subjective hypocrisy.

I've always been fair and supportive of players who played well, but I'm not going to bullshit myself about a scrub just because his success would make the Chiefs a better team.

I'm one of the rare breed on this forum who thinks that Dwayne Bowe is a good player and that Mike Catapano isn't going to be JJ Watt. That's not hating.

ChiefsCountry 05-29-2014 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 10658259)
The homers are dumbasses. Look at the Royals threads here. Anyone who would say they think the Royals can turn it around and win 92 games this year would be labeled a dumbass.

The Royals have a better shot at winning 92 games than Alex Smith does of leading us to a Super Bowl.

ToxSocks 05-29-2014 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 10658259)

I'm one of the rare breed on this forum who thinks that Dwayne Bowe is a good player and that Mike Catapano isn't going to be JJ Watt. That's not hating.

LMAO can't really argue with that.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.