ToxSocks |
05-29-2014 01:52 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
(Post 10657784)
And to the Marcelluses, RunKC's and Detoxings of the world, who of these Great Red Hopes have I been wrong about?
Of the picks I criticized heavily, here's the one I was wrong about: Dontari Poe.
Tyson Jackson? McCluster? Arenas? Alex Magee? Cassel?
Perhaps you need to stop blaming me for pissing in the Kool-Aid and figure out if the stank is from the dumb mother****ers mixing it with vinegar instead of water.
When the Chiefs make great selections like Berry and Houston, I praise them. When they go to war with stiffs like Mike Brown, Zach Thomas, or ****a I don't.
We've all seen how good franchises are run. This is not one of them. So perhaps, instead of bitching at other people who note reality, you should do what I did and refuse to subsidize the incompetence.
|
My post isn't referring to you being right or wrong, it's about whether or not you're being objective.
Your posts are rarely ever objective because the only time you really post is to do battle with homers. You remove objectivity in order to drive home your point.
I'll always remember a specific thread you made....it was after some preseason games iirc. I remember it because it was completely objective. It was rare. You didn't make it to argue with homers, you made it to have an objective analysis.
I was able to read it and go down the list
yup
yup
yup
yup
ehhh...i disagree
yup
It was a fantastic thread because it highlighted the negatives and positives, rather than just the negatives.
Most of the time, however, you simply post to call homers dumbasses. It's hard to call you objective when your sole purpose is to tell the sunshine and rainbow crowd that they're stupid. You get so hell bent on proving them wrong that your posts lose their objectivity.
|