To those of you who keep saying that he didn't admit punching the kid, here it is once again. When she talked about him punching the kid in the chest, he responded, "Okay, so what about you? What you gonna do?"

No denial. No questioning what she was talking about. He said "okay" and shifted the focus to her.

That does not sound like the way an innocent man would respond to an accusation of punching a child.

If your the owner do you need this drama, twice now, drafting him and now this shit show.
Reek cant keep out of news, after getting a 2nd chance, an opportunity of a lifetime.

Now a 3rd chance ? time will tell

Apparently investigators heard the same thing from the child too. What racist spin can we put on that?

In the darkness of the time- that some funny shizzle rite thar

We have proof that his baby momma is a liar.

No reasonable doubt needed.

Yeah, that, the part where they talk about her lying, and where he says she should be terrified of him.... Just too much, man.

My dad along with most of my friends' dads would then be considered "child abusers" which is totally and completely not true. Idk where you were raised but getting whooped with a belt on the rear is nothing out of the norm.

EDIT: now the age is a little concerning. I am not sure if a 3 yr old is warranted a whooping with a belt.

My thoughts exactly. If my wife ever falsely accused me of that, I wouldn’t let it slide by. I would be livid and correct her immediately.

What about a broken arm though?

She's baiting him and pissing him off on purpose.

He's a hothead and she's distracting him and ****ing with his head ON PURPOSE.

You Shut the **** up.....dude

No way! Innocent til proven guilty!


Oh wait he choked her out while she was pregnant

The “that’s why you can’t keep a ****ing man” is what screams the loudest at me. Sounds like he is leaving her.

Apparently, investigators are supposed to keep child investigations confidential. Does that law apply to black people?

If there is a forensic interview of the kid, the quality of it depends on the interviewer and the kids cognitive ability.

I bet a good forensic interview of the kid, would be helpful to Tyreek.

Not defending Hill, but he didn’t know he was being recorded. In private, people aren’t as likely to feel the need to state the obvious (assuming Hill didn’t hit him). That’s probably how the DA viewed it