Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16173815)

I'm pretty sure I can see how this is gonna go.

In 3 years I'm going to be the "YOU HATED [chiefs 1st round WR]!!!!" guy just as I became the "you HATED Chris Jones!!!" guy.

I don't want ANY of these WRs in the first round. And it's not because of any of the players specifically - it's the approach.

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16173815)

I'm pretty sure I can see how this is gonna go.

In 3 years I'm going to be the "YOU HATED [chiefs 1st round WR]!!!!" guy just as I became the "you HATED Chris Jones!!!" guy.

I don't want ANY of these WRs in the first round. And it's not because of any of the players specifically - it's the approach.

Originally Posted by mkp785 (Post 16175093)

What are your opinions of George Pickens? I remember he was another guy who due to be a top 10 pick before injury bug bit him.

He might be available in the second.....could be a great gamble if he's fully recovered.

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 16178333)

If the Chiefs are willing to part with #94 this year, they can turn #62 into about the #50.

I could definitely see them doing something like that to get a guy they want. Much more value in that, IMO, than packaging the same pick to move up in the 1st (where it only moves you up about to #26).

And puts you in cherry position to select one of the DBs or WRs who might slip into that range.

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 16178333)

If the Chiefs are willing to part with #94 this year, they can turn #62 into about the #50.

I could definitely see them doing something like that to get a guy they want. Much more value in that, IMO, than packaging the same pick to move up in the 1st (where it only moves you up about to #26).

And puts you in cherry position to select one of the DBs or WRs who might slip into that range.

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16149885)

I'd be happy to use one of those 3rds to move up and grab the right DE.

I'd be more happy still to see the right DE fall to us at 30 and then use one of those 3rds to move up from 62 and snag the right complement to said DE taken at 30.

A 3rd rounder moves us up 12-14 spots in the 2nd. It moves us up 4-6 spots in the first.

With just a little luck in the first, we can REALLY do some damage in the 2nd and put ourselves in awfully nice shape for a guy like Bonitto or someone who has the inverse traits/productivity matrix to the guy we take in the 1st.

I'd sure like to have that 3rd in my pocket still come round 2.

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16178362)

I just don’t think they’re going to go DE in the first and the second….unless someone falls.

I would assume that they’re going to sign one in FA and then draft one in the top 3 rounds.

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16178377)

Probably not.

I could see 1st and 3rd w/ the 2nd going towards WR or DB, as Idaho suggested.

And I'd be fine with that as well. Like I said - just really would prefer keep that third rounder in our pocket into the 2nd...

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16178390)

I don’t even think we’ll get two in the first three rounds. We have Danna and Kaindoh. They’ll add a FA and a draft pick and then round it off with either Herring or Calhoun. That’s just my thought though. It’s not what I would do but I could see them doing it.

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16178396)

Gotta hit the interior as well, though.

Maybe not two edge players, but I could see a pure edge and a hybrid sort of inside/outside player as well.

Like if they went Leal in the 1st, the 3rd might be a perfect spot for Bonitto or someone similar. You get your 'pure' edge in Bonitto for a LEO sort of setup. You put Ingram on the outside with Leal in the middle for Nascar situations, then in more strict run setups you can put Ingram and Leal on the edges w/ Saunders/Jones/Nnadi (gotta think the market will be pretty stale for him).

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16178346)

Reeeeeepost....