I wanted to go with a RB, but as bad as this team is a 4-5 year player won't be around long enough to see us be competitive.....add in the fact that I had Saffold starting at LT and it was a no-brainer.

Well hell. Anybody looking to move up to #10? I'll give it 10 minutes or so.

I know it isn't ideal for the Knuckledraggers, but they really should be going with Barron here. If not him, than Gilmore or Blackmon. All of those positions could use the upgrade.

What are you looking for? (Sayeth Duluth.)

Some guys I'd like too, but I'm guessing it would be more than I'm willing to give to mive up 17 spots.

Based on the typical draft cheat sheet, I would need your whole draft plus a pick next year.

We do have players who would welcome a move from Duluth's outdoor stadium.

Player-wise, about the only thing I'd take for this spot is a WR, DT or DE. MAYBE a LB.

Edit: Or a CB

over - rated

{clap, clap, clapclapclap}

Guy blows the hell out of a RB or two and suddenly people start ignoring the fact that he has the coverage skills of Bernard Pollard.

Don't get me wrong...he's on my board (afterall, I have Bernard Pollard), but I still don't understand the Barron love.

Well, I want to draft Fletcher Cox, so it would be cool if you didn't go the DT route...

Yeah, I wouldn't put him the Elite class by any means, but I feel it's safe to say he's a top 10 SS, no?

I thought about that route, but with Melton, Wilkerson, Vickerson and Dockett, I don't think DT is my biggest hole.

I've already got a hard-hitting coverage liability in Roman Harper.

Check your PMs

"It could be said he's a top 10 SS" - yes.

"It's safe to say he's a top 10 SS" - No.