![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Would be copying the Patriots in our unique way, with similarly skilled TEs. I don't anticipate it though. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm not saying it's what we need to do, I've already stated I want a CB, WR and G in the first 3 picks...
I'm saying it's not a bad idea. TEs are a big part of this offense. Kelce has injury history and without him the offense would be much worse off, believe me. Having 2 really good TEs forces teams to play single coverage on WRs far more often. It is going to help the Patriots big time this year just as it would us if we went that way. But again, not my preference. |
Quote:
But at this point, the Chiefs don't have the luxury of taking a TE in the 2nd round due to the fact there's a hole at CB and LG and depth could be used nearly everywhere. I think Kelce, O'Shaugnessy and Harris will be fine. Plus, they have Parker and I'm sure they'll get a priority free agent, which will end up on the PS. |
Kelce is a long term Chief, they just drafted one last year and Dorsey's pet TE is also around. They aren't drafting a ****ing Tight End.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Right now, the idea of Maclin/Conley/Kelce/Henry/Streater sounds more skilled than Maclin/WR draft pick/Kelce/Harris/Streater. Just being honest. I think the first bunch is MUCH more difficult to defend and gameplan for. But for the last time, I do not expect Henry to be the pick. |
They have 3 TE's under contract beyond 16. They aren't even going to consider it.
Jesus **** |
Quote:
Terrible idea. |
Quote:
|
Yeah lets not let him ****ing develop because **** that. Lets not fill actual needs so we can jack off into a jar over yet another tight end
|
Quote:
It's simply an idea. I've already said I want a corner at 37. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.