Originally Posted by CrazyHorse (Post 7180132)

Truth is CP is incapable of deveoping a new QB. Matt Cassel is proof of that.

Originally Posted by ROR (Post 7178956)

lol, wut?! I guess he'll be "developed" by 32?

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7180153)

When he was acquired: "He'll hit the ground running (literally) with this oline."

Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 7180163)

what they really meant.

Originally Posted by CrazyHorse (Post 7180132)

He's better than this time last year. Thats all I mean by that.

In other words, there is no reason to think it wont continue. Same as any developmental player that would come in. ]

Truth is CP is incapable of deveoping a new QB. Matt Cassel is proof of that.

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7180168)

QBs who hold the ball too long, however, make an average line look poor.

Originally Posted by Samson (Post 7178987)

He's an average quarterback, and we still have a below average defense.

He's proved he can score a go-ahead touchdown, on the road, in the 4th quarter, against a division rival...but our defense has constantly proved they CANNOT consistently hold a team when it really matters.

He's an average quarterback, and we still have a below average defense.

Originally Posted by Norman Einstein (Post 7179057)

Too bad you can't see it right to give Cassel a chance with that faith. He is 9games into a new offense, a new offense for the 3rd time in 2 years. You expect a freaking miracle just because we have a better defense than we've had for many years.

What if....

the Chiefs somehow make it to the playoffs, is Cassel still crap?

the Chiefs win one or more games in the playoffs, is Cassel still crap?

the Chiefs make it to the Super Bowl this year and Cassel wins MVP. Is he still crap?

All of you on the left side of the fence will say yes and will be willing to ship him off because he doesn't meet your expectations. Have you ever wondered if he meets the expectations of the Chiefs administration?

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7180168)

LMAO.

The o-line criticism is overstated, however. You don't have the top rushing team in the league (for much of the season) with a terrible line. QBs who hold the ball too long, however, make an average line look poor.

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 7180181)

QB's who hold the ball too long generally dont have the fewest sacks in the NFL....

Cassel has done a decent job getting rid of the ball.

Originally Posted by Norman Einstein (Post 7179057)

Have you ever wondered if he meets the expectations of the Chiefs administration?

Originally Posted by ROR (Post 7180184)

Defense and Special Teams and even the running game can't win every game. When it's time to pass, you have to get those completions, even if you're not a "passing team". Now granted, last week's defensive anomaly( yep, I'm going with "anomaly" because I better not EVEN see that kind of "Pinkel Quit"-horseshit from this squad one more ****ing time)completely screwed the pooch, but the first half offensively speaks to the point.
Consistency and balance were sorely lacking against Dungver.



ROFLROFLROFL Oh....oh...ROFLROFL....thanks dude, I needed that.

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7180168)

LMAO.

The o-line criticism is overstated, however. You don't have the top rushing team in the league (for much of the season) with a terrible line. QBs who hold the ball too long, however, make an average line look poor.

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 7180251)

It's much improved over last year, but it's still a fragile work in progress.