DJ is a better tackler than Siler


there is nothing to argue...the only question is: are you reeruned or super reeruned?

and how are you going to make a bet about a bench player? bench player's don't play, because they suck compared to the starters...

What does betting DJ won't miss a single tackle do?

siler could have missed the same tackle, we would never know because he would be STUCK ON THE BENCH.
Posted via Mobile Device

But you're making two different arguments here, which is what a lot of people here are doing, and it's why BlackBob's not getting smashed. Being a better linebacker is not the same as being a better tackler.

They're both pretty shitty tacklers.

McGraw is a guy with questionable coverage skills who sucks at tackling so, he's gone.

And if you question this post, I have another post ready to rape you for doing so.

Want to test me, Lack Bob?

You aren't saying anything the same as me.

I'm saying you are knocking DJ for missing a tackle when the scrub you say is a better tackler would have been five yards away and not gotten the opportunity to miss the same tackle
Posted via Mobile Device

Again, for the fifth time.

He is missing tackles a guy like siler wouldn't even have the opportunity to miss because he wouldn't get there.

DJ makes the routine tackle as often as siler.
Posted via Mobile Device

What will it do? It will force people to say they really believe DJ is a fantastic tackler. I don't believe anyone here actually thinks it. I think I piss people off and they want to run the train on me. Quit being pussies and let's go one on one.

BTW, no Mults. Man up and bet.

P.S. I am going to watch TV for a while. Just letting you know before ten of you bitches accuse me of slinking off because you got nothing else.

it's hard, i gather, with cassel's balls ricocheting off your face...but both arguments are won by DJ, as anyone with eyeballs can see..

i don't even know how one could make the comparison given siler's paltry stats and lack of playing time...shouldn't being good enough to actually play be a precondition for being 'better' at anything?

how do you define better? what will we use to determine this?

I can guarangoddamntee every person in this thread believes 100% what they are saying.


Which makes me feel bad for you.
Posted via Mobile Device

It's amusing that you're trying to use the eye test to measure who's a better tackler between an all-pro and a special teams nobody.

And yet at the same time you also are trying to use the eye test to measure the elusive quickness (i.e. missed tackle forcing ability) of Jamaal Charles and a slow midget who couldn't outjuke a 12 year old who needs Ritalin.

In either case the eye test overwhelmingly proves you wrong, yet you cling to it like it's your only saving grace in this argument.

Oh, and in both cases, they focus on the same thing- MISSED TACKLES. Which you apparently can't spot.

That doesn't make him a better tackler. That makes him a player with better range. They aren't the same thing.

It's not about that. It's about missed tackles. Siler doesn't miss as many tackles. His fundamentals are better. Go start from the beginning before you say shit like this.

Look at the game film, man! It's there!

It's about that.


goddamn you are slow.
Posted via Mobile Device