ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs Article: Chiefs Most Likely Landing Spot for Foles

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

Article: Chiefs Most Likely Landing Spot for Foles (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=269947)

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9404614)

Winning a Super Bowl is a hard thing to do.

The odds of winning a championship are against Andrew Luck and RGIII. You don't just get a championship because people think you're great.

So no, the odds are not in Geno Smith's favor.

I made a joke in another thread and Clay, as usual, acted as if his dick was pulled out his asshole.

Seriously, you guys and your "Do or Die" bullshit need to lighten the **** up.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 9398468)

thats so ****ing creepy, I have an ex that looks just like her. Like almost exactly.

get over it pussy

you meet her at your $1M per month restaurant???

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9404645)

Is that what I said? Then why don't you quote me?

Pull it up. Quote me.

Or, just shut your ****ing cockhole, basement dweller.

You said Geno won't win a Super Bowl.

Because you're being pissy.

do or die is the right attitude when it comes to this cluster**** of a franchise. Benefit of doubt capital.....long...since...spent.
Posted via Mobile Device

fwiw

Sources: Eagles not likely to trade Nick Foles

http://www.csnphilly.com/eagles/sour...ade-nick-foles

Posting from my phone or I would post entire article.

On Mike & Mike both guys pretty much guaranteed that the chiefs will trade for Foles.

I just love all the conflicting reports. shit slinging 101

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmya (Post 9404776)

On Mike & Mike both guys pretty much guaranteed that the chiefs will trade for Foles.

Just like Alex Smith was a lock for KC. They're just running through the lists to have something to talk about on the air.

Philly would have little incentive to get rid of Foles unless they got above market value in trade. They need a viable backup if they are trotting Vick out as the starter. How would they improve over Foles?

I hope to God we don't get Foles. If we do, I guess we're just cursed to keep getting coaches/GMs that come in here and just trade or sign for their backup from their old team. **** that. Sadly, the only time we've tried to draft a QB and give him a legit shot to be the guy was Herman ****ing Edwards/Carl ****ing Peterson. Yeah Croyle failed hard, but at least they tried doing the correct thing.

There is a reason teams have given us all their leftover QB's over the years...One less team to worry about.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmya (Post 9404776)

On Mike & Mike both guys pretty much guaranteed that the chiefs will trade for Foles.

https://i.minus.com/iUl8WKJCRheFz.gif

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9398054)

People are obsessed with what the Redskins did last year.

Maybe it was smart. I know at the time, though, everybody said they were crazy for bringing in another QB in the 4th round like that.

Now some Chiefs fans want to use a 1st and a THIRD round pick (and a high one at that) to get our franchise guy and back up.

This shit has to end somewhere, guys. They're BACKUPS for ****'s sake

This. The benefit they got was an exception, not a norm.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9402994)

If anyone should go after Foles.....it should be the Cardinals.

Cardinals have already tried the Eagles back-up route.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9403011)

If we are gonna trade for Foles, it better be for a 2014 draft pick and no more than a 3rd.

I could live with that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9403148)

Hopefully he isn't that dumb

LOL at a lot of posters here who sooo wanted Chip Kelly.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotCarl (Post 9403890)

Worrisome. You don't trade draft picks for a player you intend to be a backup.

If Foles is with the Chiefs, it's an indication that Reid thinks highly of him and will give him a solid chance to start. I don't think Reid would want him as a back up. I think he may have seen something in the kid during his starts last year.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty (Post 9404530)

If you go by the draft chart, moving from #4 to #1 is 1200 points, the same value as the #12 pick in the first round. Doing the trade as above would be essentially saying that Foles is worth a middle first round pick. No way.

If the Chiefs do something like this, they better get Foles, the Eagles' 2nd pick this year (540 points) and a conditional 2nd or 3rd next year (and maybe even a later round pick this year) or they are leaving too much value on the table.

Technically true. But realistically they won't get that much. I hear draft charts are no longer the drafting bible.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9404768)

fwiw

Sources: Eagles not likely to trade Nick Foles

http://www.csnphilly.com/eagles/sour...ade-nick-foles

Posting from my phone or I would post entire article.

They are trying to increase his value. Just posturing. I think they want to trade him. He is simply not a Chip Kelly type QB.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9404807)

If he doesn't fit the Chip Kelly system he's basically useless to them. That's a pretty good incentive to trade him.

A short article in todays USA Today says that while nothing is "in the works" yet, a source familiar with KC's thinking says they are very much interested in Foles.

Dont shoot the messenger...

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 9405208)

Foles is not one of those cases.