ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Andy Reid shuts down your Chiefs QB controversy talk (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=303268)

Kman34 11-01-2016 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Dole (Post 12522666)
As long as those people are primarily concerned with Fantasy points and not W-L record.

All 8 of you.

Alex has won 15 out of the last 17 reg season games plus a playoff game..... All I care about is a QB that will win the game.... Alex or Foles...you have one job.... win the ****ing game...

DaneMcCloud 11-01-2016 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12522668)
oh sorry , you said "dismal"

and yes theres a difference in most of the stats, with foles having better stats with very little downside...

so again, if Foles has been 'dismal' how would you describe SMith after comparing them side by side and asking "what stats?" and been showed the stats...

Are you ****ING serious?

Ming the Merciless 11-01-2016 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12522678)
Are you ****ING serious?

Did you read what I am responding to?

Dude said foles stats were "dismal"

look at foles career stats side by side with smiths

foles beats him in nearly every key stat......what did I say that you actually disagree with?

Its a simple ****ign question Dane...if foles has 'dismal' stats...what are smiths?...Look them up and tell me.

Kman34 11-01-2016 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kman34 (Post 12522675)
Alex has won 15 out of the last 17 reg season games plus a playoff game..... All I care about is a QB that will win the game.... Alex or Foles...you have one job.... win the ****ing game...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12522680)
Did you read what I am responding to?

Dude said foles stats were "dismal"

look at foles career stats side by side with smiths

foles beats him in nearly every key stat......what did I say that you actually disagree with?

Its a simple ****ign question Dane...if foles has 'dismal' stats...what are smiths?...Look them up and tell me.

Win and losses too???

DaneMcCloud 11-01-2016 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12522680)
Did you read what I am responding to?

Dude said foles stats were "dismal"

look at foles career stats side by side with smiths

foles beats him in nearly every key stat......what did I say that you actually disagree with?

Its a simple ****ign question Dane...if foles has 'dismal' stats...what are smiths?...Look them up and tell me.


Let's see Foles put up 5 "Plus" seasons.

Good ****ing god.

Dartgod 11-01-2016 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12522668)
oh sorry , you said "dismal"

and yes theres a difference in most of the stats, with foles having better stats with very little downside...

so again, if Foles has been 'dismal' how would you describe SMith after comparing them side by side and asking "what stats?" and been showed the stats...

There is not a substantial difference between the two to warrant making a change , IMO.

Like Dane, I trust Andy.

Ming the Merciless 11-01-2016 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kman34 (Post 12522685)
Win and losses too???

sure compare them 5 years into their careers

Dartgod 11-01-2016 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12522680)
Did you read what I am responding to?

Dude said foles stats were "dismal"

look at foles career stats side by side with smiths

foles beats him in nearly every key stat......what did I say that you actually disagree with?

Its a simple ****ign question Dane...if foles has 'dismal' stats...what are smiths?...Look them up and tell me.

Hey **** stick, I looked up the definition of dismal and then admitted that I probably used the wrong word in that post.

So you can kindly stop using that in your posts if you expect to have any credibility.

Ming the Merciless 11-01-2016 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12522688)
Let's see Foles put up 5 "Plus" seasons.

Good ****ing god.

what exactly did I say that you disagree with here?

Im not saying bench alex smith...

What did I say that you disagree with, exactly...or are you just being an asshole to me for no reason?

Ming the Merciless 11-01-2016 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 12522696)
Hey **** stick, I looked up the definition of dismal and then admitted that I probably used the wrong word in that post.

good lord youre a pussy

you did use the wrong word ..theres no probably about it..

and regardless foles stats are better than smiths

Dartgod 11-01-2016 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12522700)
good lord youre a pussy

And you are being dishonest.

oaklandhater 11-01-2016 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Dole (Post 12522666)
As long as those people are primarily concerned with Fantasy points and not W-L record.

All 8 of you.

Then the bucs would have kept Brad johnson
or ravens Dilfer

You can win inspite of a game manger QB.

It mean's nothing.

Ming the Merciless 11-01-2016 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 12522691)
There is not a substantial difference between the two to warrant making a change ,

Im not saying to make a change...I was just pointing out an incorrect statement...

Ive never said to bench smith...

holy shit...

Ming the Merciless 11-01-2016 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 12522701)
And you are being dishonest.

well what did I say that was untrue..??

TYhats what I am asking

Dartgod 11-01-2016 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12522700)
good lord youre a pussy

you did use the wrong word ..theres no probably about it..

and regardless foles stats are better than smiths

This over the inclusion of the word "probably"?

And I'm the pussy?

ROFL ROFL ROFL


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.