ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs *****The Josh Simmons Thread***** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=357948)

FloridaMan88 05-01-2025 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzzy (Post 18052400)
Except Bill Belichick.

100 GMs out 100 GMs would take a HOF LT over a HOF TE.

The same Belichick that signed Gronk to a 6 year $54 million contract extension in 2012, which was at the time the largest ever for a TE?

fuzzy 05-01-2025 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FloridaMan88 (Post 18052404)
The same Belichick that signed Gronk to a 6 year $54 million contract extension in 2012, which was at the time the largest ever for a TE?

The Patriots could afford that luxury because they were already set at Left Tackle.

FloridaMan88 05-01-2025 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzzy (Post 18052405)
The Patriots could afford that luxury because they were already set at Left Tackle.

Belichick didn't pay to keep Nate Solder... true?

DRM08 05-01-2025 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shields68 (Post 18052388)
Personally i do not thiink that Trent was ever coming to KC. He most likely was using the Chiefs to get the 49ers offer a little higher.

That is exactly the case. Trent Williams wanted to stay in San Francisco. Chiefs gave him the leverage he needed to really squeeze the Niners for top dollar. He got exactly what he wanted, but he ultimately gave up a chance to win 2+ championships.

Bl00dyBizkitz 05-01-2025 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzzy (Post 18052400)
Except Bill Belichick.

100 GMs out 100 GMs would take a HOF LT over a HOF TE.

Yeah I think ill just quit while I'm ahead. This conversation won't be getting any better.

PHOG 05-01-2025 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shields68 (Post 18052388)
Personally i do not thiink that Trent was ever coming to KC. He most likely was using the Chiefs to get the 49ers offer a little higher.

This is what I remember reading about the situation.

BWillie 05-01-2025 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FloridaMan88 (Post 18050325)
Especially when you look at the other side and see Jawaan Taylor’s $27 million cap #.

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 18052401)
The point from which you’re arguing is disingenuous.

They did try to make Trent Williams the highest paid tackle. They didn’t choose Kelce over him. San Fran just hit the bid button once it got to “desperate” mode and KC did.

That was a serious attempt. So was trading a first for Orlando Brown and trying to lock him up long-term to the top contract at the position.

Spending top 3 round picks isn’t half-assed or dumpster diving. It’s just a different type of gamble.

Trent Williams has literally been the only top tackle other than Orlando Brown and Jawaan Taylor to hit the market. Those are the three best Ts, and the Chiefs have tried with all three.

Acting like the Chiefs haven’t been serious about replacing Eric Fisher is just silly.

The worst contract on the team is probably Taylor...but there wasn't anything the Chiefs could do at that point after OBJ ****ed us. They really thought he could probably play LT.

The next worst is Creed Humphrey which we did to ourselves for absolutely no reason.

dlphg9 05-02-2025 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 18051678)
The report post button isn't there for whenever someone calls you a bitch though, just FYI.

Lmfao, only a bitch would do that.

Warpaint69 05-02-2025 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 18052438)
The worst contract on the team is probably Taylor...but there wasn't anything the Chiefs could do at that point after OBJ ****ed us. They really thought he could probably play LT.

The next worst is Creed Humphrey which we did to ourselves for absolutely no reason.

Creed and the eventual Trey Smith deal aren't a big deal as long as Simmons plays at a high level at LT for 4 years assuming his rookie season is a redshirt year, if Kingsley wins the LG position and plays it well, and after this season you rid yourself of the Taylor deal with ideally someone on the roster or a rookie is drafted to man the position. That's three cheap deals to offset 2 big contracts.

Balto 05-02-2025 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warpaint69 (Post 18052969)
Creed and the eventual Trey Smith deal aren't a big deal as long as Simmons plays at a high level at LT for 4 years assuming his rookie season is a redshirt year, if Kingsley wins the LG position and plays it well, and after this season you rid yourself of the Taylor deal with ideally someone on the roster or a rookie is drafted to man the position. That's three cheap deals to offset 2 big contracts.

While I'd love it, could you imagine what some would do if we took another tackle with our 1st round pick next year?

dlphg9 05-02-2025 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzzy (Post 18052346)
He's finally investing some REAL capital into the Tackle Position. And yes, I do agree that Simmons is not a guarantee. But he is a genuine and honest attempt (the first real committed attempt to fix the problem) of Veach's career to fix Left Tackle long term.

1. Invest a 1st round pick at Tackle

2. Pony up and reset the Tackle market with a top Tackle like Trent

Either of these would have been perfectly F'ing appropriate. I just wish it didn't take so long.

Noobs get more dumb by the day.

Veach tried to make Trent the highest paid LT, but he really wanted to play for the 49ers and took that deal instead.

He traded a 1st rounder and tried to make him one of the highest paid LTs of all time, but OBJ was an idiot.

He paid Taylor $20 mil/yr and thought he could move to LT.

He draft Wanya Morris in the 3rd and Kingsley S. in the 2nd.

Wtf else could Veach have done? He's done everything he could outside of ****ing over the future of this team and trading away multiple 1st round picks to jump up and get a top talent.

The fact that you call this the first real committed attempt at getting a LT just tells me you're either a troll, ignorant, or both. I'm not sure how anyone with a brain could ever accuse Brett Veach of not trying to fill a position of need. He's been able to fix every single hole this team has had outside of LT and he's tried multiple times to fix that position, as well.

BWillie 05-02-2025 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warpaint69 (Post 18052969)
Creed and the eventual Trey Smith deal aren't a big deal as long as Simmons plays at a high level at LT for 4 years assuming his rookie season is a redshirt year, if Kingsley wins the LG position and plays it well, and after this season you rid yourself of the Taylor deal with ideally someone on the roster or a rookie is drafted to man the position. That's three cheap deals to offset 2 big contracts.

If Simmons plays to expectation and Kingsley is an above guard there is no reason Mahomes doesn't become the best QB in the NFL again.

dlphg9 05-02-2025 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warpaint69 (Post 18052969)
Creed and the eventual Trey Smith deal aren't a big deal as long as Simmons plays at a high level at LT for 4 years assuming his rookie season is a redshirt year, if Kingsley wins the LG position and plays it well, and after this season you rid yourself of the Taylor deal with ideally someone on the roster or a rookie is drafted to man the position. That's three cheap deals to offset 2 big contracts.

I hope to Patrick Mahomes that Smith doesn't get a long-term deal. It's ****ing ridiculous that he's making $23.4 mil this year which is $2.4 mil/yr more than the next highest guard. He'd be the 8th highest paid tackle right now.

How the hell is the franchise tag for a guard so high?

Warpaint69 05-02-2025 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlphg9 (Post 18053015)
I hope to Patrick Mahomes that Smith doesn't get a long-term deal. It's ****ing ridiculous that he's making $23.4 mil this year which is $2.4 mil/yr more than the next highest guard. He'd be the 8th highest paid tackle right now.

How the hell is the franchise tag for a guard so high?

Teams handing out those big contracts to guards has pushed the tag up

DJ's left nut 05-02-2025 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warpaint69 (Post 18053050)
Teams handing out those big contracts to guards has pushed the tag up

Nope.

There's no distinction between OG and OT on the franchise market. OT's drive the franchise tag up for the OGs.

I think that's part of why Creed was able to get such a big jump - our leverage was piss poor because the tag wasn't a realistic threat.

And frankly, it SHOULDN'T have been a threat here either. We should've signed the guy last offseason or traded him this offseason. Or walked away from him.

If we don't have a deal done by now, it means we're either going to get cornholed on a LTC or one's not going to get done at all.

We messed this up something awful.

DJ's left nut 05-02-2025 11:28 AM

The other crazy thing about the franchise tag right now is that DTs make more than DEs. And LBs make more than BOTH of them.

And it's nothing more than a classification fluke.

The best edge rushers and the guys that drive the franchise tag prices ended up getting classified as "LBs" because they rush off the edge in 2-point stances so often that they get a OLB classification for the tag purposes.

Which pushes the DE value way down by removing those big numbers from the tag average and drives the LB figure way up. DT is a 'true' franchise figure based on what DTs are making because there's really not a ton of overlap. The DTs are DTs; there aren't a ton (like Jones) who play some DE.

The LB figure is probably inflated by about $8 million and the DE figure probably deflated by about $4 million. They're all sorts of wonky.

duncan_idaho 05-02-2025 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlphg9 (Post 18052989)
Noobs get more dumb by the day.

Veach tried to make Trent the highest paid LT, but he really wanted to play for the 49ers and took that deal instead.

He traded a 1st rounder and tried to make him one of the highest paid LTs of all time, but OBJ was an idiot.

He paid Taylor $20 mil/yr and thought he could move to LT.

He draft Wanya Morris in the 3rd and Kingsley S. in the 2nd.

Wtf else could Veach have done? He's done everything he could outside of ****ing over the future of this team and trading away multiple 1st round picks to jump up and get a top talent.

The fact that you call this the first real committed attempt at getting a LT just tells me you're either a troll, ignorant, or both. I'm not sure how anyone with a brain could ever accuse Brett Veach of not trying to fill a position of need. He's been able to fix every single hole this team has had outside of LT and he's tried multiple times to fix that position, as well.

He's on record that they should have traded whatever it took to go to 3 or 4 last year to take Joe Alt. So...

dlphg9 05-02-2025 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 18053143)
He's on record that they should have traded whatever it took to go to 3 or 4 last year to take Joe Alt. So...

The only possible way that happens is if we trade Patrick Mahomes. 3 was the Pats and I don't think they would have given up #3 for anything we had. We could have offered 3-4 first rounders and that wouldn't have been worth it for them to give up Maye. I guess Arizona would have taken 3 or 4 1sts to lose the best WR prospect since Calvin Johnson, but losing all those draft picks could possibly detrimental to a team like the Chiefs that depend on the draft to supplement talent, since we don't have a ton of space every year.

Giving away so much capital on an unknown is dumb as hell. At that point just try to trade a team for a proven LT. If you're gonna **** your future might as well do it for a known commodity.

God damn that dude is dumb.

dlphg9 05-02-2025 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 18053062)
Nope.

There's no distinction between OG and OT on the franchise market. OT's drive the franchise tag up for the OGs.

I think that's part of why Creed was able to get such a big jump - our leverage was piss poor because the tag wasn't a realistic threat.

And frankly, it SHOULDN'T have been a threat here either. We should've signed the guy last offseason or traded him this offseason. Or walked away from him.

If we don't have a deal done by now, it means we're either going to get cornholed on a LTC or one's not going to get done at all.

We messed this up something awful.

Wtf? Why would they have OGs and OTs the same, but split DTs and DEs?

Completely agree about the Trey Smith stuff. The franchise tag was the worst possible option, especially when you add in the fact that they were so far apart.

I'm really wondering where each side is at when it comes to AAV.

DJ's left nut 05-02-2025 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlphg9 (Post 18053168)
Wtf? Why would they have OGs and OTs the same, but split DTs and DEs?

Completely agree about the Trey Smith stuff. The franchise tag was the worst possible option, especially when you add in the fact that they were so far apart.

I'm really wondering where each side is at when it comes to AAV.

And STILL don't get the DE distinction right, no less....

Yeah, it doesn't make a damn bit of sense how they do it. And honestly, I've been surprised that someone like Kelce hasn't fought the TE designation given that the guys who are getting paid spend a whole lot of time essentially being large slot receivers.

They gotta draw their lines somewhere, I guess. But even if that's the case, why does someone playing a 5 technique from a 2 point stance qualify as a LBer when the same guy coming from a 3-point stance is going to get called a DE?

it's all pretty wild.

Kiimo 05-02-2025 01:07 PM

Whoa holy crap apparently the Chiefs rookie camp starts TOMORROW

wonder if he'll do anything


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">NFL rookie minicamp dates for all 32 teams: <a href="https://t.co/xxVf36FopY">pic.twitter.com/xxVf36FopY</a></p>&mdash; Ari Meirov (@MySportsUpdate) <a href="https://twitter.com/MySportsUpdate/status/1918368532133495150?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 2, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

staylor26 05-02-2025 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimo (Post 18053176)
Whoa holy crap apparently the Chiefs rookie camp starts TOMORROW

wonder if he'll do anything


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">NFL rookie minicamp dates for all 32 teams: <a href="https://t.co/xxVf36FopY">pic.twitter.com/xxVf36FopY</a></p>&mdash; Ari Meirov (@MySportsUpdate) <a href="https://twitter.com/MySportsUpdate/status/1918368532133495150?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 2, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

He posted a pair of cleats in the locker room on his IG story:


https://i.imgur.com/zTYESUf.jpeg

BWillie 05-02-2025 01:18 PM

For what it's worth, I watched an RGR Football YouTube Video (I know great source!!!) and they said from all accounts it appears Simmons only had only a partial tear of his Patellar tendon and that it was caught right away. Surgery was swift. If there was a best case scenario ever for a torn Pattelar tendon, it would be his situation.

duncan_idaho 05-02-2025 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 18053188)
For what it's worth, I watched an RGR Football YouTube Video (I know great source!!!) and they said from all accounts it appears Simmons only had only a partial tear of his Patellar tendon and that it was caught right away. Surgery was swift. If there was a best case scenario ever for a torn Pattelar tendon, it would be his situation.

I watched the same video.

It was well done, but I lost a lot of faith in it when the dude just made up that Simmons is 80 percent likely to recover 100 percent from the injury...

His maths don't math...

BWillie 05-02-2025 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 18053205)
I watched the same video.

It was well done, but I lost a lot of faith in it when the dude just made up that Simmons is 80 percent likely to recover 100 percent from the injury...

His maths don't math...

Yeah it seemed sort of arbitrary and like he just pulled that number out of thin air. Because he did.

Bearcat 05-02-2025 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlphg9 (Post 18052962)
Lmfao, only a bitch would do that.

He PM'd me yesterday and said he was going to asterisks shit up.

Quote:

Good to know. Time to **** shit up. And thank you for calling me out publicly, bitch.
https://media0.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2...c19G/giphy.gif

Kiimo 05-02-2025 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 18053183)
He posted a pair of cleats in the locker room on his IG story:


https://i.imgur.com/zTYESUf.jpeg



Those are cleats? Some retro ass cleats I guess

staylor26 05-02-2025 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimo (Post 18053247)
Those are cleats? Some retro ass cleats I guess

They're custom. If you zoom, you can see the cleats on the bottom.

Bl00dyBizkitz 05-02-2025 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlphg9 (Post 18052989)
Wtf else could Veach have done? He's done everything he could outside of ****ing over the future of this team and trading away multiple 1st round picks to jump up and get a top talent.

I think he's implying we should've done this after we didn't get Trent. And like, who the hell would be our trade parter over the years? Is there a bad team with a great LT out there? Because that's the trade target you're looking for, and I dont even think that exists.

fuzzy 05-02-2025 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bl00dyBizkitz (Post 18053272)
I think he's implying we should've done this after we didn't get Trent. And like, who the hell would be our trade parter over the years? Is there a bad team with a great LT out there? Because that's the trade target you're looking for, and I dont even think that exists.

We traded a future 1st to acquire Patrick Mahomes. I'd support doing the same to acquire a Left Tackle.

Bl00dyBizkitz 05-02-2025 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzzy (Post 18053285)
We traded a future 1st to acquire Patrick Mahomes. I'd support doing the same to acquire a Left Tackle.

Joe Alt would've been at least 2 firsts. From 32nd to 5th? Thats gonna cost ya. And who would willingly trade a LT to us? It would have to be NFC and theyd make us pay through the teeth for it.

xztop123 05-02-2025 03:12 PM

Raf simmons customized cleats. Never seen those

Mecca 05-02-2025 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bl00dyBizkitz (Post 18053296)
Joe Alt would've been at least 2 firsts. From 32nd to 5th? Thats gonna cost ya. And who would willingly trade a LT to us? It would have to be NFC and theyd make us pay through the teeth for it.

More like 3 1's plus more... you'd have to move to 4. You're asking Arizona who is the first team not taking a QB to pass on Harrison Jr who is an elite of elite prospect..to drop to 32.

The only way this works is if you give up insane value, is Joe Alt worth all of that?

Bl00dyBizkitz 05-02-2025 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 18053349)
More like 3 1's plus more... you'd have to move to 4. You're asking Arizona who is the first team not taking a QB to pass on Harrison Jr who is an elite of elite prospect..to drop to 32.

The only way this works is if you give up insane value, is Joe Alt worth all of that?

Yeah I was being generous.

There isn't a reasonable universe where you get a top 15 LT for the rest of Mahomes career with "just" a 1st round and change. Not in a trade nor in a trade up in the draft. Not where we pick from.

The first "real" attempt at fixing the LT position. Sure.

kccrow 05-02-2025 04:13 PM

If you're going from 31/32 to 10 you're giving up at least two 1s and a 2, and likely a 4. Going to 4 would be ****ing insane. Add at least another 1 and 2, and probably another 4.

I'd give it up to get to 10 if the guy looks like a sure thing. Going to 4 though, that's just getting into ridiculous territory. That's 2 future drafts without premier players. You simply can't substantiate that.

fuzzy 05-02-2025 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 18053402)
If you're going from 31/32 to 10 you're giving up at least two 1s and a 2, and likely a 4. Going to 4 would be ****ing insane. Add at least another 1 and 2, and probably another 4.

I'd give it up to get to 10 if the guy looks like a sure thing. Going to 4 though, that's just getting into ridiculous territory. That's 2 future drafts without premier players. You simply can't substantiate that.

That's why you offer a player. If you offer Rashee Rice then the whole game changes. I'd trade Rice and a future 1st for Joe Alt. No brainer.

BWillie 05-02-2025 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 18053402)
If you're going from 31/32 to 10 you're giving up at least two 1s and a 2, and likely a 4. Going to 4 would be ****ing insane. Add at least another 1 and 2, and probably another 4.

I'd give it up to get to 10 if the guy looks like a sure thing. Going to 4 though, that's just getting into ridiculous territory. That's 2 future drafts without premier players. You simply can't substantiate that.

I want all of our picks back and then the punt returner because I feel like it.

kccrow 05-02-2025 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 18053067)
The other crazy thing about the franchise tag right now is that DTs make more than DEs. And LBs make more than BOTH of them.

And it's nothing more than a classification fluke.

The best edge rushers and the guys that drive the franchise tag prices ended up getting classified as "LBs" because they rush off the edge in 2-point stances so often that they get a OLB classification for the tag purposes.

Which pushes the DE value way down by removing those big numbers from the tag average and drives the LB figure way up. DT is a 'true' franchise figure based on what DTs are making because there's really not a ton of overlap. The DTs are DTs; there aren't a ton (like Jones) who play some DE.

The LB figure is probably inflated by about $8 million and the DE figure probably deflated by about $4 million. They're all sorts of wonky.

Yeah, it just feels like it's time for the NFL to re-class tags.

4-3 DE or 3-4 OLB as ER and IOL vs OT split both need to happen

kccrow 05-02-2025 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzzy (Post 18053410)
That's why you offer a player. If you offer Rashee Rice then the whole game changes. I'd trade Rice and a future 1st for Joe Alt. No brainer.

No way Rice and a 1 is getting you to #4, but it might get you to #10.

Kiimo 05-02-2025 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xztop123 (Post 18053327)
Raf simmons customized cleats. Never seen those


Occasionally I'm accidentally fashionable when I wear shirts with holes in them.

Scooter LaCanforno 05-02-2025 05:51 PM

Most of the Draft experts figured the Chiefs would have to jump the Texans,Rams and Ravens to get Simmons. Veach was like William Wallace in Braveheart. Hold...Hold....Hold.

staylor26 05-02-2025 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scooter LaCanforno (Post 18053476)
Most of the Draft experts figured the Chiefs would have to jump the Texans,Rams and Ravens to get Simmons. Veach was like William Wallace in Braveheart. Hold...Hold....Hold.

The Texans trading out and the the Commanders taking Conerly a few picks later sealed it.

duncan_idaho 05-02-2025 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scooter LaCanforno (Post 18053476)
Most of the Draft experts figured the Chiefs would have to jump the Texans,Rams and Ravens to get Simmons. Veach was like William Wallace in Braveheart. Hold...Hold....Hold.


If the Ravens had been in need of a LT and passed on him, that would be a bad sign, IMO.

Though I suspect they’ll be more cautious with bad injuries that “look as good as possible right now” following the David Ojabo pick and failure.

Coochie liquor 05-02-2025 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 18052369)
You left out Donovan Smith. But that’s a good summary

And DJ BumKnees, who was worthless from the start.

RealSNR 05-02-2025 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzzy (Post 18053410)
That's why you offer a player. If you offer Rashee Rice then the whole game changes. I'd trade Rice and a future 1st for Joe Alt. No brainer.


You seem nice

Chris Meck 05-02-2025 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzzy (Post 18053285)
We traded a future 1st to acquire Patrick Mahomes. I'd support doing the same to acquire a Left Tackle.

How's about we see how it goes with the #1 that we just took (and got a free 5th in the bargain)?

Just saying.

Kiimo 05-02-2025 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 18053493)
The Texans trading out and the the Commanders taking Conerly a few picks later sealed it.

I know you liked Conerly but I will feel justified if he really does end up a guard.


I mean he can pass block but we'll see if I'm right about the run blocking part.



Meanwhile Seth Keysor on 810 said Simmons had zero "losses" on pass blocking from what he reviewed which is kind of insane.


Look I wanted Burton and maybe it's copium but I'm getting excited about Simmons

Palangi 05-02-2025 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 18053547)
How's about we see how it goes with the #1 that we just took (and got a free 5th in the bargain)?

Just saying.

I agree. But let’s see both ways. The Internet doctor degree doesn’t prove good or bad either.

dlphg9 05-02-2025 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzzy (Post 18053410)
That's why you offer a player. If you offer Rashee Rice then the whole game changes. I'd trade Rice and a future 1st for Joe Alt. No brainer.

You're just incredibly dumb. That wasn't gonna happen either.

RunKC 05-03-2025 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 18053205)
I watched the same video.

It was well done, but I lost a lot of faith in it when the dude just made up that Simmons is 80 percent likely to recover 100 percent from the injury...

His maths don't math...

It’s been repeated a lot from Dr interviews on this kid that the surgery for Simmons was “well done” bringing the question…have some of these past NFL players not had as successful surgeries with this injury?

Sterling Holmes did an interview with a Dr who said even a millimeters difference changes flexibility and strength in the knee long term. That’s a pretty goddamn fine line. It’s also why being a surgeon has to be stressful as hell.

Robotics have obviously been around for decades, but only recently has it amplified to such an extent with the use of AI algorithms for image recognition, surgical field analysis, motion control and enhancing surgical precision. I wonder if Simmons Dr used this technology to have a more precise surgery that will help recovery compared to other players?

The reason I say that was bc it was insane how well that kid was moving at his pro day just 5 months post-op. Like I did not expect that at all when I saw it.

Not to say Simmons will be fine. I’m just curious to see what Burkholder found to make him feel confident, and if this was part of his confidence.

duncan_idaho 05-03-2025 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzzy (Post 18053410)
That's why you offer a player. If you offer Rashee Rice then the whole game changes. I'd trade Rice and a future 1st for Joe Alt. No brainer.

Real life NFL is not Madden.

You need to get real. Of course you would make that trade. Neither the Cardinals nor the Chargers would have accepted that deal.

There's no "force trade" button, either.

Kiimo 05-03-2025 01:38 PM

If the "partial tear" rumor is true it changes...well everything about this pick

Deberg_1990 05-03-2025 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coochie liquor (Post 18053497)
And DJ BumKnees, who was worthless from the start.

I saw he signed with the Niners a few days ago. It will be interesting to see if he ever returns to form.

Hammock Parties 05-03-2025 03:06 PM

Favoring that knee quite a bit.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">QB Protector: Josh Simmons<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> 1st round pick in a Chiefs uniform for the first time.<br><br>Simmons went through warm ups, but just watched during individual drills. <a href="https://t.co/io7FYXJ5xz">pic.twitter.com/io7FYXJ5xz</a></p>&mdash; Matt Foster (@MattFosterTV) <a href="https://twitter.com/MattFosterTV/status/1918757918620422551?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 3, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

RealSNR 05-03-2025 03:29 PM

Not to worry. It's his non-power knee.

Palangi 05-03-2025 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 18054131)
Favoring that knee quite a bit.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">QB Protector: Josh Simmons<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> 1st round pick in a Chiefs uniform for the first time.<br><br>Simmons went through warm ups, but just watched during individual drills. <a href="https://t.co/io7FYXJ5xz">pic.twitter.com/io7FYXJ5xz</a></p>&mdash; Matt Foster (@MattFosterTV) <a href="https://twitter.com/MattFosterTV/status/1918757918620422551?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 3, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I guess we see what we want to see

nychief 05-03-2025 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 18054131)
Favoring that knee quite a bit.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">QB Protector: Josh Simmons<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> 1st round pick in a Chiefs uniform for the first time.<br><br>Simmons went through warm ups, but just watched during individual drills. <a href="https://t.co/io7FYXJ5xz">pic.twitter.com/io7FYXJ5xz</a></p>&mdash; Matt Foster (@MattFosterTV) <a href="https://twitter.com/MattFosterTV/status/1918757918620422551?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 3, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



He's the best goddamn stretcher I've ever seen. GENERATIONAL.

RealSNR 05-03-2025 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nychief (Post 18054178)
He's the best goddamn stretcher I've ever seen. GENERATIONAL.

His stretching puts him in the top 5 players drafted EASILY if it weren't for the injury!

Hammock Parties 05-03-2025 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 18054147)
Not to worry. It's his non-power knee.

Yes but eventually because he favors one of them, the other one will also become less stable.

He will need both knees replaced if he wants to walk after the age of 40.

BWillie 05-03-2025 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 18054181)
Yes but eventually because he favors one of them, the other one will also become less stable.

He will need both knees replaced if he wants to walk after the age of 40.

You are an excellent doctor.

Kiimo 05-03-2025 05:08 PM

This is an ongoing joke he said the same thing about him getting out of the plane

PHOG 05-03-2025 06:31 PM

poor guy, 1st round draft pick, shouldn't have been picked before the 3rd round, I bet he has nothing to prove.

Infidel Goat 05-03-2025 07:28 PM

Either he is super limber or they undermeasured his arm length at the combine.

Pitt Gorilla 05-03-2025 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 18054131)
Favoring that knee quite a bit.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">QB Protector: Josh Simmons<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> 1st round pick in a Chiefs uniform for the first time.<br><br>Simmons went through warm ups, but just watched during individual drills. <a href="https://t.co/io7FYXJ5xz">pic.twitter.com/io7FYXJ5xz</a></p>&mdash; Matt Foster (@MattFosterTV) <a href="https://twitter.com/MattFosterTV/status/1918757918620422551?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 3, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Man, there are some big dudes out there. Just checked the rookie camp roster and there's a 6-5 240 WR from Brown. That camp would be fun to watch.

Chieftain 05-03-2025 08:19 PM

Kid just looks like a franchise LT by his presence alone. Have a great feeling he will be special.

SAGA45 05-03-2025 08:29 PM

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/NR9mRJ2XfMM?si=8VtalxwLImB7cPvs" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Bump 05-03-2025 11:39 PM

He's gonna be like **** the Raiders and Max Crosby by December

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GqDGjZSX...jpg&name=small

BossChief 05-03-2025 11:50 PM

Anyone else starting to think we might have straight up stole this kid?

Palangi 05-03-2025 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infidel Goat (Post 18054367)
Either he is super limber or they undermeasured his arm length at the combine.

He measured 34 1/8” at the Ohio state pro day. 1 1/8” longer than the combine.

carcosa 05-04-2025 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 18054558)
Anyone else starting to think we might have straight up stole this kid?

If he isn't a first ballot hall of famer, I will run myself through a woodchipper!

New World Order 05-04-2025 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nychief (Post 18054178)
He's the best goddamn stretcher I've ever seen. GENERATIONAL.

His stretching is unbelievable. We for sure have a top 5 tackle of all-time

Wooooooooooooo doggie

staylor26 05-04-2025 11:13 AM

I think the point being missed is that this is a great sign for his potential availability to start TC. Guys that are still relatively far away aren't putting on a helmet and going through little drills in early May.

I know Reid said he'd be ready for camp, but he didn't say day 1. I'm starting to believe that might actually be what he meant, which is incredible to say the least.

Bowser 05-04-2025 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 18054784)
I think the point being missed is that this is a great sign for his potential availability to start TC. Guys that are still relatively far away aren't putting on a helmet and going through little drills in early May.

I know Reid said he'd be ready for camp, but he didn't say day 1. I'm starting to believe that might actually be what he meant, which is incredible to say the least.

I still think he'll be placed on PUP to start the season.

Tribal Warfare 05-04-2025 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 18054784)
I think the point being missed is that this is a great sign for his potential availability to start TC. Guys that are still relatively far away aren't putting on a helmet and going through little drills in early May.

I know Reid said he'd be ready for camp, but he didn't say day 1. I'm starting to believe that might actually be what he meant, which is incredible to say the least.

Guys like Matt Derrick, Nick Jacobs, and Nate Taylor said expect this be a red shirt season anything else is hype concerning him starting.

In58men 05-04-2025 11:36 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Andy Reid said he’s surprised at how well Josh Simmons moved around on his first day at rookie minicamp. Still a lot of evaluation left, of course.</p>&mdash; Sam McDowell (@SamMcDowell11) <a href="https://twitter.com/SamMcDowell11/status/1919080764034982248?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 4, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

fuzzy 05-04-2025 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 18054803)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Andy Reid said he’s surprised at how well Josh Simmons moved around on his first day at rookie minicamp. Still a lot of evaluation left, of course.</p>&mdash; Sam McDowell (@SamMcDowell11) <a href="https://twitter.com/SamMcDowell11/status/1919080764034982248?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 4, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

He's gonna be awesome.

staylor26 05-04-2025 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 18054798)
I still think he'll be placed on PUP to start the season.

It would contradict everything we've heard from the team.

staylor26 05-04-2025 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 18054801)
Guys like Matt Derrick, Nick Jacobs, and Nate Taylor said expect this be a red shirt season anything else is hype concerning him starting.

I never said anything about him being starting. And even by RS they're simply talking about him starting, and obviously, that's not the plan.

That doesn't mean he's not going to go through TC and the preseason regularly like he's healthy. That's what's important here.

SAGA45 05-04-2025 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 18054803)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Andy Reid said he’s surprised at how well Josh Simmons moved around on his first day at rookie minicamp. Still a lot of evaluation left, of course.</p>&mdash; Sam McDowell (@SamMcDowell11) <a href="https://twitter.com/SamMcDowell11/status/1919080764034982248?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 4, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Good stuff. Seeing him out there in #71, he looks like Silverback. Similar builds.

Chris Meck 05-04-2025 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 18054801)
Guys like Matt Derrick, Nick Jacobs, and Nate Taylor said expect this be a red shirt season anything else is hype concerning him starting.

3 guys who know absolutely nothing and are guessing like all the rest of us.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.