duncan_idaho |
07-01-2016 10:30 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by fahrenheit
(Post 12297738)
I'm not sure he's ever going to be quite as good as Lindor, at least from his track record. In 5 years of MiLB ball Lindor produced at +.100 OPS rate and Mondesi strikes out twice as much with half the walk rate. I get the fascination with his tools but at some point he has to start producing. At this point he's more Alcides Escobar than Francisco Lindor.
|
Oh, I'm not sure of that, either. But he has the tools to be a .300 hitter with 20-25 HR power. And defensively he's right there with him (maybe a little more arm). The power has started to translate, finally, over the past few seasons. The hit tool usually comes last, but there's reason for optimism there, too.
Lindor also was a year older at each stop of the minors. This season is the first time we can compare their performance at the same level at the same age.
Lindor was .278/.352/.389 at AA Akron at age 20. Mondesi compares fairly closely with that right now (much more SLG, less OBP).
Escobar never had the type of pop Mondesi has started to translate to games in the past few years.
Ian Desmond with good defense is probably a better "good case" comparison for Mondesi (the version that was a .270ish hitter with 20/20 production for the Nats). But his ceiling is absolutely as high as current Lindor.
Guys like Mondesi are hard to frame just based on stats, considering how aggressively they've advanced him. He's been facing guys five-six years older than him his entire career. That can be brutal, especially at the A ball level.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|