Originally Posted by SAUTO (Post 14344290)

Oh. Your post said "her meal ticket is gone, the payment goes to an auditor "

I guess I missed where she had been found guilty of extortion, or even charged...

Originally Posted by Lprechaun (Post 14344317)

They werent married, money is involved by possible extortion.
I never said it as a fact I said it as a possibility.
A court allowing access to funds deemed for child care which surely could or would be misappropriated are handled by an outside source.

Originally Posted by SAUTO (Post 14344313)

well do you have a link to it?

That would add to the conversation, more than you doing math over and over. That's for sure.

Originally Posted by SAUTO (Post 14344321)

I've never seen child support handled by an outside source.

I mean it's supposed to go to housing and things like that. She's getting a meal ticket if they are all his.

Originally Posted by Lprechaun (Post 14344309)

Seems like Sauto logic, you've never heard of it so not must not be true.
Add to the conversations fellas....
Trying to counter everyone is getting really old.
Now he has you doing it.
Remember .... 2+2=4
A squirrel gets 2 acorns, he then gets two more, he now has 4 acorns. He doesnt know math, he doesnt know what numbers are but he still has 4 acorns.

Originally Posted by Chief Northman (Post 14344316)

:rolleyes:

You said it. Both getting time, but neither exclusively. In other words, they BOTH have work to do. DCF isn’t going to just green light full custody to her given the recent past.
She’s trying to get out in front of something here - that is obvious. The reconciling is OVER.

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14344327)

Tyreek will have to pay more child support if the twins are his and if he signs long term. She would have to sign a petition for modification

Originally Posted by Lprechaun (Post 14344322)

Link to what exactly? I threw out a hypothesis and things that pertain to such cases.
This thread was great for a few days while you were away....

Originally Posted by Lprechaun (Post 14344322)

Link to what exactly? I threw out a hypothesis and things that pertain to such cases.
This thread was great for a few days while you were away....

Originally Posted by Lprechaun (Post 14344324)

Link?

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 14344330)

Is it that difficult to show your work?

I mean, if what you say is so easy a caveman could understand it, wouldn't yo be able to quickly cite some examples? Give a link to a similar case?

Or is it just easier to spout shit off and hope no one calls you on it?

Originally Posted by Lprechaun (Post 14344309)

Seems like Sauto logic, you've never heard of it so not must not be true.
Add to the conversations fellas....
Trying to counter everyone is getting really old.
Now he has you doing it.
Remember .... 2+2=4
A squirrel gets 2 acorns, he then gets two more, he now has 4 acorns. He doesnt know math, he doesnt know what numbers are but he still has 4 acorns.

Originally Posted by Lprechaun (Post 14344329)

Yeah no doubt he will have to pay pretty big child support.
But they werent married and he has no obligation for alimony does he?

Originally Posted by SAUTO (Post 14344334)

I missed you ROFL