|
Quote:
|
In case there's any confusion over the bad robot discussion, I loved the 2009 Star Trek movie (actually own it on DVD, it's in its own little plastic enterprise case!) and think everything that I've seen of the sequel looks great.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
1. Lost 2. Dicking around and taking forever to make a sequel. That's pretty much it. |
Judging from the 10-minute IMAX "prologue" I saw three times today, the flavor of "Star Trek Into Darkness" seems to be the same as "Star Trek". Same music, same sweeping "reveal" of the ship, same hot Uhura, same snappy banter between Kirk and Spock and Kirk and Bones, same humor and line delivery from Scotty, same energetic pace (the prologue was very reminiscent of the segment where the Enterprise appears at Vulcan and Kirk, Sulu, and Redshirt bail from the shuttle to go hand-to-hand on the dangly energy-blaster-thingy). Seems like Abrams and the bigwigs said, "It worked once, let's not **** it up too much." Which is fine by me.
Oh, did I mention how bad I want Zoe Saldana? :hump: |
I had the hugest crazy psycho cyber crush on Zoe Saldana after Star Trek and Avatar.
|
Quote:
|
On second thought....where is my Felicity movie Abrams?? There can never be too much Keri Russel.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
9 minutes were spectacular.
Felt pretty fresh and original even though it was just a prologue obviously. Real Indiana Jones vibes. LMAO |
I didn't get to see the 9 minutes yet, or the new trailer. Which is pretty freaking badass.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/r5gdbUC9mWU?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Pretty cool......it looks like they are giving Pine the classic Shatner hairstyle of the early 60s as well.
|
This thing is gonna be so ****ing good.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
