For the record, this is not about mizzou. This is questioning how the **** Miami got away with not just a slap on the wrist. A slap on the pinky.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Give Danny Manning's dad another job while you're at it.... |
I shouldn't have bumped this because it's leading to Mizzou chatter.
Seriously, nobody's going to comment on the laughingstock idea that Miami gets ZERO bowl bans? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The NCAA's sanctions on Miami are a complete joke. The Oregon sanctions are even worse, because that in my opinion was university endorsed cheating. Keep in mind that USC had two forced bowl bans (with a good team) and lost 30 scholarships. The NCAA has set a horrible precedent. The rules don't even matter anymore. |
Quote:
It is called credit for time served... 2 bowl bans, 3 years of uncertainty that led to massive levels of negative recruiting tactics used against Miami. |
Quote:
The ironic thing about the whole Nevin Shapiro situation is it is difficult to show how Miami actually benefited, as a program from the benefits he provided players. During the years he was doing this, Miami's program actually began a gradual decline... especially in recruiting. |
So what? Kansas got a year of probation in 1989 because of a plane ticket Larry Brown bought for a transfer who decided to not even come to play for him. Rules are rules, whether you benefit or not is not the point.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.