ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs MELLINGER: Should The Chiefs Move On From Smith? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=305318)

Hammock Parties 07-23-2017 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12970005)
Yea, because that was my point! You love throwing out stats until the same kinda stats get thrown right back in your ****ing face.

Regular season stats are largely irrelevant in a playoff game.

Ask any GM, coach or defensive coordinator. They'd rather face Hoyer than Roethlisberger.

This isn't rocket science but homers just keep on truckin.'

Reerun_KC 07-23-2017 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 12969998)
If nothing else ASS has provided some great comedic material.

Sadly. Those folks actually believe that hidden touchdowns and punter setups are actual stats that are measured and tracked.

staylor26 07-23-2017 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12970006)
Regular season stats are largely irrelevant in a playoff game.

Ask any GM, coach or defensive coordinator. They'd rather face Hoyer than Roethlisberger.

This isn't rocket science but homers just keep on truckin.'

You're changing the argument and ignoring the other context I provided.

Roethlisberger and the Steelers were still a defensive team with no defense. Their offense hadn't yet begun its ascension. Roethlisberger's stats back then and the years before that support this. Your Roethlisberger shit was revision history because that team ****ing sucked including him.

The Chiefs beat a team on the same level handily in their house, while the Broncos won a close one at home.

The Chiefs playoff win was easily more impressive. Shut the **** up already.

RunKC 07-23-2017 04:56 PM

Broncos have gotten so lucky in the playoffs. How many steeler defenders got hurt in that Tebow game? They lost a shit load of talent to injury that day.

Then in 2015 they play the Steelers again with no LeVeon bell, no AB, no DeAngelo Williams and Big Ben had a major injury to his throwing arm.

JohnV 07-23-2017 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12969983)
Roethlisberger threw 21 TD's and 14 INT's in 2011. Their defense had fallen apart due to injuries and age.

That team lost to ****ing Tim Tebow. There wasn't much difference between that Steelers team and the Texans team we beat. At least the Texans were actually good on one side of the ball. Like I said, we blew them out like we should in their house. The Broncos won a tight one in Mike High. Give me a ****ing break.

The Steelers had the number 1 defense in 2011....

JohnV 07-23-2017 05:44 PM

That Tebow Bronco playoff win against Big Ben and the #1 D was way more impressive than the Texans Hoyer win

Hammock Parties 07-23-2017 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnV (Post 12970099)
The Steelers had the number 1 defense in 2011....

LMAO

staylor, pwned again

staylor26 07-23-2017 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12970110)
LMAO

staylor, pwned again

When I said they had no defense I meant in that game, hence a "defensive team with no defense". They were depleted with injuries/aging players. The Tebow led Broncos scored 29. Did you even ****ing watch that game?

staylor26 07-23-2017 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnV (Post 12970103)
That Tebow Bronco playoff win against Big Ben and the #1 D was way more impressive than the Texans Hoyer win

Another idiot that's looking at stats and didn't watch the game.

Hammock Parties 07-23-2017 06:06 PM

So Roethlisberger's regular season stats matter, but Pitt's defensive ranking doesn't. LMAO

Cherry picking m'fer.

staylor26 07-23-2017 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12970138)
So Roethlisberger's regular season stats matter, but Pitt's defensive ranking doesn't. LMAO

Cherry picking m'fer.

Nothing changed with Roethlisberger from the regular season to the playoffs.

A lot changed with that defense.

Shut the **** up.

JohnV 07-23-2017 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12970126)
Another idiot that's looking at stats and didn't watch the game.

You can't honestly think a playoff win against Hoyer and a Texans team that didn't show for the game is more impressive than an OT win behind 300 yards and 2 touchdowns from Tim Tebow against Big Ben and the #1 defense that had won multiple SBs.

PAChiefsGuy 07-23-2017 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnV (Post 12970166)
You can't honestly think a playoff win against Hoyer and a Texans team that didn't show for the game is more impressive than an OT win behind 300 yards and 2 touchdowns from Tim Tebow against Big Ben and the #1 defense that had won multiple SBs.

What are you trying to say exactly?

I don't see the point of this post. A playoff WC win is just that a playoff WC win which one was more 'impressive' doesn't really matter.

chiefzilla1501 07-23-2017 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnV (Post 12970166)
You can't honestly think a playoff win against Hoyer and a Texans team that didn't show for the game is more impressive than an OT win behind 300 yards and 2 touchdowns from Tim Tebow against Big Ben and the #1 defense that had won multiple SBs.

Yeah, I don't really get the point of any Chiefs' fan flexing nuts on this. I really could care less which win was more impressive. I care about which win was more meaningful. No matter how bad the Texans were, this is exactly the type of game the Chiefs always frustratingly lose in the playoffs. This is exactly the type of game the Bengals lose every single year in the playoffs. The Broncos don't have the history the Chiefs have of playoff disappointment.

It is a huge weight off the franchise to not have to worry about the drought. If you don't believe that, talk to any Bengals fan.

Tombstone RJ 07-23-2017 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12970126)
Another idiot that's looking at stats and didn't watch the game.

Staylor all upset over facts... Broncos are in your head...

Reerun_KC 07-23-2017 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 12970197)
Yeah, I don't really get the point of any Chiefs' fan flexing nuts on this. I really could care less which win was more impressive. I care about which win was more meaningful. No matter how bad the Texans were, this is exactly the type of game the Chiefs always frustratingly lose in the playoffs. This is exactly the type of game the Bengals lose every single year in the playoffs.

It is a huge weight off the franchise to not have to worry about the drought. If you don't believe that, talk to any Bengals fan.

Its time we go ahead and start winning consistanly in the playoffs... We love to flex our regular season dick and throw around the win/loss record of Alex and Andy...

But its time we start worrying about winning when it matters and stop getting pounded like a $3 hooker...

1-3 is kinda sad considering we spout off about winning meaningless games...

ChiefsCountry 07-23-2017 06:52 PM

Beating the Texans with Hoyer is like losing your virginity by paying a hooker. Sure it counts and feels good but it's still not the best way to go about it.

Bewbies 07-23-2017 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12970201)
Staylor all upset over facts... Broncos are in your head...

Big Ben wasn't injured so badly he shouldn't have played. Clearly his injury had 0 effect on the outcome of that one....

TigeRRUppeRRcut 07-23-2017 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12969974)
Only on Chiefsplanet is beating Brian Hoyer in the playoffs more impressive than a win over future HOFer Ben Roethlisberger.

You disregard a blowout win against a playoff team by using the Hoyer argument. Meanwhile every single one of our losses came at a 1 score loss with many key players out with injury.

Geno, being Geno. ROFL

PAChiefsGuy 07-23-2017 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 12970207)
Beating the Texans with Hoyer is like losing your virginity by paying a hooker. Sure it counts and feels good but it's still not the best way to go about it.

I like how you guys try to downplay beating a playoff team. The Bills haven't made the playoffs in 17-years... Before Reid/Alex Smith got here it was 21-years since we won a playoff gm. That's a long time and we've had some good teams here. Think about that for a second.

This is the NFL, the best players/coaches in the world. Winning any NFL playoff game is impressive and an accomplishment. Hell winning a game in the NFL is an accomplishment. Every team and game is tough and a different challenge.

Most of you guys probably couldn't even make your HS football team and you want to compare beating a playoff team to buying a hooker because Alex Smith isn't an elite QB so stupid...

Give credit where credit is due. It was a great win for this organization to finally get that monkey off our back.

Reerun_KC 07-23-2017 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12970223)
I like how you guys try to downplay beating a playoff team. The Bills haven't made the playoffs in 17-years... Before Reid/Alex Smith got here it was 21-years. Think about that for a second.

This is the NFL, the best players/coaches in the world. Winning any NFL playoff game is impressive and an accomplishment. Hell winning a game in the NFL is an accomplishment. Every team and game is tough and a different challenge.

Most of you guys probably couldn't even make your HS football team and you want to compare beating a playoff team to buying a hooker because Alex Smith isn't an elite QB so stupid...

Did you just throw out HS football smack as a reference to someones ability to discuss football?

BigBeauford 07-23-2017 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12970223)
I like how you guys try to downplay beating a playoff team. The Bills haven't made the playoffs in 17-years... Before Reid/Alex Smith got here it was 21-years since we won a playoff gm. That's a long time and we've had some good teams here. Think about that for a second.

This is the NFL, the best players/coaches in the world. Winning any NFL playoff game is impressive and an accomplishment. Hell winning a game in the NFL is an accomplishment. Every team and game is tough and a different challenge.

Most of you guys probably couldn't even make your HS football team and you want to compare beating a playoff team to buying a hooker because Alex Smith isn't an elite QB so stupid...

Give credit where credit is due. It was a great win for this organization to finally get that monkey off our back.

You probably couldn't make the high school debate team, and that never seemed to stop you on here.

chiefzilla1501 07-23-2017 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 12970204)
Its time we go ahead and start winning consistanly in the playoffs... We love to flex our regular season dick and throw around the win/loss record of Alex and Andy...

But its time we start worrying about winning when it matters and stop getting pounded like a $3 hooker...

1-3 is kinda sad considering we spout off about winning meaningless games...

We have a different directive now. Win a Super Bowl. Alex is not the guy to do that.

But he was a good guy to stabilize our franchise which was badly needed at that time. He outlived that purpose probably around last year. And the Chiefs went out and aggressively went after his replacement. So the team seems to recognize that meaningless wins aren't enough. As long as they understand that, I don't have a problem with Alex being the transition guy.

Tombstone RJ 07-23-2017 07:07 PM

This coming draft, 2017, is gonna be a better QB draft class.

Reerun_KC 07-23-2017 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12970239)
This coming draft, 2017, is gonna be a better QB draft class.

You going to draft one?

PAChiefsGuy 07-23-2017 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 12970229)
Did you just throw out HS football smack as a reference to someones ability to discuss football?

That's not what I meant. You figure it out I'm not going to spell it out for you.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigBeauford (Post 12970234)
You probably couldn't make the high school debate team, and that never seemed to stop you on here.

Just because I disagree with people who talk about Alex Smith like he is the worst QB of all-time doesn't mean I can't talk about football on an internet message board.

What is it a requirement that I have to hate Alex Smith to post here so I don't offend you guys? Sorry I never got that memo.

Reerun_KC 07-23-2017 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12970246)
That's not what I meant. You figure it out I'm not going to spell it out for you.

Nice, so you said this "Most of you guys probably couldn't even make your HS football team and you want to compare beating a playoff team to buying a hooker because Alex Smith isn't an elite QB so stupid..." but its not what you meant?

Tombstone RJ 07-23-2017 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 12970243)
You going to draft one?

No, just pointing this out. KC could have not lost its first round pick, and taken a better QB in the next draft.

Reerun_KC 07-23-2017 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12970246)
Just because I disagree with people who talk about Alex Smith like he is the worst QB of all-time doesn't mean I can't talk about football on an internet message board.

What is it a requirement that I have to hate Alex Smith to post here so I don't offend you guys? Sorry I never got that memo.


Hes not the worse of all time... Hes just not "the guy" that has "IT" to lead a team in the playoffs... Like what I did there. Threw out some lame cliches...

12 years in the league and what 2 playoff wins? Nah, thanks Alex, but were done here...

Reerun_KC 07-23-2017 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12970253)
No, just pointing this out. KC could have not lost its first round pick, and taken a better QB in the next draft.

Thanks for your insightful insight there scooter...

New World Order 07-23-2017 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12970239)
This coming draft, 2017, is gonna be a better QB draft class.


Already throwing the towel in on Grbac Jr, eh?

I don't blame you

DaneMcCloud 07-23-2017 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12970239)
This coming draft, 2017, is gonna be a better QB draft class.

Yeah, the 2017 draft is going to be great.

ROFL

****ing dumbass

RunKC 07-23-2017 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12970253)
No, just pointing this out. KC could have not lost its first round pick, and taken a better QB in the next draft.

ROFL

Ming the Merciless 07-23-2017 07:32 PM

Yes

Discuss Thrower 07-23-2017 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12970253)
and taken a better QB in the next draft.

Closet TrueFan sighted.

Tombstone RJ 07-23-2017 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 12970281)
Closet TrueFan sighted.

Oops, 2018 draft. Point remains the same.

DaneMcCloud 07-23-2017 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12970285)
Oops, 2018 draft. Point remains the same.

Yeah, it does, because you're ****ing stupid

Red Dawg 07-23-2017 07:41 PM

I didn't realize we had people on CP that can predict the future. No QB in the next draft has the arm talent nor the play making ability of Mahomes. The guy had an all time terrible defense and still kicked ass. Texas Tech lost like 4 games when they scored over 35 points.

Only the USC kid is a true bad ass and he will stay in school if the wring team has the number one pick. He basically said so when he told teams not to tank for him.

Tombstone RJ 07-23-2017 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12970286)
Yeah, it does, because you're ****ing stupid

Meh, don't care. Fact is KC traded up for a QB who can't even start because he comes from a college chuck and duck system. The 2018 draft will have better QBs and it will be deeper too.

DaneMcCloud 07-23-2017 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 12970289)
I didn't realize we had people on CP that can predict the future. No QB in the next draft has the arm talent nor the play making ability of Mahomes.

Stop taking out of your ass

RunKC 07-23-2017 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12970290)
Meh, don't care. Fact is KC traded up for a QB who can't even start because he comes from a college chuck and duck system. The 2018 draft will have better QBs and it will be deeper too.

Congrats. You just described Paxton Lynch and admitted that he has no shot

DaneMcCloud 07-23-2017 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12970290)
Meh, don't care. Fact is KC traded up for a QB who can't even start because he comes from a college chuck and duck system. The 2018 draft will have better QBs and it will be deeper too.

The Chiefs drafted a QB of the FUTURE.

Not 2017 and most likely, not 2018.

FUTURE.

You're smoking crack if you think the Chiefs could have jumped into the Top Three without giving up a massive amount of future draft choices.

The first time you make a sensible post on CP will be the first time.

milkman 07-23-2017 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12970223)
I like how you guys try to downplay beating a playoff team. The Bills haven't made the playoffs in 17-years... Before Reid/Alex Smith got here it was 21-years since we won a playoff gm. That's a long time and we've had some good teams here. Think about that for a second.

This is the NFL, the best players/coaches in the world. Winning any NFL playoff game is impressive and an accomplishment. Hell winning a game in the NFL is an accomplishment. Every team and game is tough and a different challenge.

Most of you guys probably couldn't even make your HS football team and you want to compare beating a playoff team to buying a hooker because Alex Smith isn't an elite QB so stupid...

Give credit where credit is due. It was a great win for this organization to finally get that monkey off our back.

You, my friend, are a useless ****ing tool.

Tombstone RJ 07-23-2017 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12970293)
Congrats. You just described Paxton Lynch and admitted that he has no shot

The Broncos gave up a third round pick for Lynch and he's probably gonna start this year. Plus the Broncos drafted a better NFL QB prospect in Kelly (than Mahomes) in the 7th round.

Reerun_KC 07-23-2017 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12970303)
The Broncos gave up a third round pick for Lynch and he's probably gonna start this year. Plus the Broncos drafted a better NFL QB prospect in Kelly, in the 7th round.

Well we drafted a better prospect in the 2nd round. And my dad is better than your dad.

Eleazar 07-23-2017 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12970290)
Meh, don't care. Fact is KC traded up for a QB who can't even start because he comes from a college chuck and duck system. The 2018 draft will have better QBs and it will be deeper too.

If they had wanted a QB who was more pro-ready, they'd have picked one of the ones that was available.

Obviously, they feel fine with Alex Smith in the short term and did not see picking a project QB high in the first round as an issue.

I don't think anyone should be concerned with Mahomes as a quarterback on draft day, my main concern is whether Andy Reid can develop him, being that there isn't much evidence of his ability to do that other than McNabb, who was from the pro-ready category, and that was closing in on 20 years ago.

The right coaching, offense, and personnel situation could certainly see Mahomes develop into a great QB. Time will prove if we have that.

Tombstone RJ 07-23-2017 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12970296)
The Chiefs drafted a QB of the FUTURE.

Not 2017 and most likely, not 2018.

FUTURE.

You're smoking crack if you think the Chiefs could have jumped into the Top Three without giving up a massive amount of future draft choices.

The first time you make a sensible post on CP will be the first time.

What team trades up that far in the first round, for a QB project?

Eleazar 07-23-2017 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12970309)
What team trades up that far in the first round, for a QB project?

The one that traded two second round picks for Alex Smith, and thinks they can contend for a Super Bowl with him?

Tombstone RJ 07-23-2017 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 12970313)
The one that traded two second round picks for Alex Smith, and thinks they can contend for a Super Bowl with him?

Touché.

milkman 07-23-2017 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12970309)
What team trades up that far in the first round, for a QB project?

One that has the time to work on the development of a QB that they believe has elite upside.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-23-2017 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 12969924)
Thanks.. feels like he has been here much longer.

He's closing in on the Casselian Eternity.

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 12970302)
You, my friend, are a useless ****ing tool.

ROFL:clap:

And that ends THAT debate. Thank you, and GOODNIGHT!

Bewbies 07-23-2017 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12970303)
The Broncos gave up a third round pick for Lynch and he's probably gonna start this year. Plus the Broncos drafted a better NFL QB prospect in Kelly (than Mahomes) in the 7th round.

People do tend to take the best prospects with the last pick in the draft.

Discuss Thrower 07-23-2017 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12970303)
The Broncos gave up a third round pick for Lynch and he's probably gonna start this year. Plus the Broncos drafted a better NFL QB prospect in Kelly (than Mahomes) in the 7th round.

If he's the better QB prospect, then why did 32 teams pass on the dude four or more times over?

RealSNR 07-23-2017 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12970290)
Meh, don't care. Fact is KC traded up for a QB who can't even start because he comes from a college chuck and duck system. The 2018 draft will have better QBs and it will be deeper too.

We'll see who declares, but thus far it looks like 2018 isn't all that it's cracked up to be. People were down on Mahomes, Watson, and others in this class for a lack of familiarity with pro system concepts, but the top of 2018 is populated with guys like Lamar Jackson, Lucas Falk, Chase Litton, and Mason Rudolph. Dumbed down spread/air raid concept offenses, or as you call them "college chuck and duck" systems-- and NONE of those guys have the arm talent that Mahomes has.

Darnold might not even declare, and he's had ONE season-- he's still largely an unknown. He might be pretty damn good, though. Rosen apparently is a ****ing toolbag and his path to the NFL seems to be taking the Christian Hackenberg turn. And Josh Allen might be the best of the bunch, or he might be a flaming bag of dicks if he can't figure out how to get better control and accuracy on his throws.

It's still really early to tell, but everybody claiming 2018 is an endless sea of awesome NFL starting QBs needs to pump the brakes.

DaneMcCloud 07-23-2017 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 12970313)
The one that traded two second round picks for Alex Smith, and thinks they can contend for a Super Bowl with him?

**** off, **** Rag

DaneMcCloud 07-23-2017 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12970316)
Touché.

When was the last time won with a QB they drafted?

DaneMcCloud 07-23-2017 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12970309)
What team trades up that far in the first round, for a QB project?

The Broncos

Hammock Parties 07-23-2017 10:20 PM

http://i.imgur.com/ZCZx1Wm.jpg

DaneMcCloud 07-23-2017 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 12970334)
He's closing in on the Casselian Eternity!

Matt Cassel had ONE winning season, Coward.

DaneMcCloud 07-23-2017 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12970488)
.


**** off and die, [name removed for filter evasion]

Tombstone RJ 07-23-2017 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12970487)
The Broncos

Wrong again

DaneMcCloud 07-23-2017 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12970496)
Wrong again

You're right, I'm wrong.

They traded for a 6'7 of Osweiler.

Good luck.

Eleazar 07-23-2017 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 12970316)
Touché.

I guess I should say the team that traded picks for Alex Smith, that thinks they can contend with Alex Smith, that once thought Matt Cassel, Herman Edwards, and Romeo Crennel were answers; the team that once went into a season with Brodie Croyle starting at QB; that kept Carl Peterson enthroned through 4 presidential administrations but is now on its fourth GM in the last decade; a team with ownership that was torn on deciding if Scott Pioli had done enough to get fired but sent Dorsey out on a rail after presiding over everything they extended Andy Reid for... the team that once made "Play good football" and "Eliminate bad football" rallying cries... we should be used to it all by now.

I know, I know... "your choice to be a fan" :clap:

All is well, we have great ownership, a great regular season coach, and a QB who's haughtiest boast would be that he throws a lower than average number of interceptions. Get your super bowl tickets now...

DaneMcCloud 07-23-2017 11:00 PM

You can't pimp your real name one this website for more than a decade, then suddenly, "Hey, stop publishing my real name, even though I've authorized them use of my real na,e for more than a decade.".

There isn't court of law, anywhere, that would stand by that ruling.

Claynus, otherwise known as [name removed for filter evasion] ****ed himself.

For the 235,214th time and counting.

I'm sure his future dates will be thrilled.

Nickhead 07-23-2017 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12970490)
**** off and die, [name removed for filter evasion]

https://media.giphy.com/media/lQKPZLBNdp4Gs/giphy.gif

DaneMcCloud 07-23-2017 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nickhead (Post 12970519)

I can't see what you linked, but go away, Dumbo.

Besides the fact you've brought ZERO to this forum since you joined, the jizz on your lips from sucking off Claynus dried a long time ago.

Adios, Cockbag.

Nickhead 07-23-2017 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12970523)
I can't see what you linked, but go away, Dumbo.

Besides the fact you've brought ZERO to this forum since you joined, the jizz on your lips from sucking off Claynus dried a long time ago.

Adios, Cockbag.

i have obviously provided 2858 posts for you to hate, so i have done 'something' here. nor did i say i was leaving the forum, so i don't know who you are waving goodbye to.

of all the immature posters here, you have got to be the worst whinger of them all. i hate to bring up old shit, but your wife must be a very unhappy woman for you to be filled with this amount of rage.

do your kids flinch when you sneeze?

Baby Lee 07-23-2017 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nickhead (Post 12970519)

Now, now. Be kind

Mr. [name removed for filter evasion], that's his name. No one ever knew his name cause he's a no-one.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wyDjRd0Tjss" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

DaneMcCloud 07-23-2017 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nickhead;12970529of
all the immature posters here, you have got to be the worst whinger of them all.

You're right. I'm the biggest "whinger" of them all.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nickhead;12970529of
i hate to bring up old shit, but your wife must be a very unhappy woman for you to be filled with this amount of rage.

Rage? Against epic dipshit like you? A ****ing **** that ran away from America to become Australian, just to have kids that don't like you and a second wife that cheats on you all the time?

Wha?

Nickhead 07-23-2017 11:40 PM

it's emotionally challenging for me. you see, when all is calm i actually like dane, tiger, clay, etc...

and i obviously have partaken in some of the shit throwing, but man they can muck up the board. they are easily derailable and takes the fun out of it. but if i don't throw my hat in the middle of the ring, i wouldn't get a word in edge wise ;)

DaneMcCloud 07-23-2017 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nickhead (Post 12970546)
it's emotionally challenging for me. you see, when all is calm i actually like dane, tiger, clay, etc...

and i obviously have partaken in some of the shit throwing, but man they can muck up the board. they are easily derailable and takes the fun out of it. but if i don't throw my hat in the middle of the ring, i wouldn't get a word in edge wise ;)

How large is your vagina?

That took ONE MINUTE

Nickhead 07-23-2017 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12970543)
You're right. I'm the biggest "whinger" of them all.



Rage? Against epic dipshit like you? A ****ing **** that ran away from America to become Australian, just to have kids that don't like you and a second wife that cheats on you all the time?

Wha?

LOLOLOL

okay, baby steps. i have only had one wife. my current one. i didn't run away to australia, i flew. and finally given you and my distance, it is creepy you would know my wife is cheating on me. do tell :D

DaneMcCloud 07-23-2017 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nickhead (Post 12970550)
LOLOLOL

okay, baby steps. i have only had one wife. my current one. i didn't run away to australia, i flew. and finally given you and my distance, it is creepy you would know my wife is cheating on me. do tell :D

Okay, I guess the last wife was imaginary.

JFC, you talked about your last wife and kids.

DaneMcCloud 07-23-2017 11:45 PM

If you wanna to again, I'm all in

DaneMcCloud 07-23-2017 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nickhead (Post 12970550)
LOLOLOL

Here's the problem, Genious (CP spelling): I have an Eidetic Memory.

Good luck!

Nickhead 07-24-2017 12:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12970551)
Okay, I guess the last wife was imaginary.

JFC, you talked about your last wife and kids.

this is where you let your ego get in the way of reality. i may have mentioned my kids and their mother(s), but i never said i was married before my current wife. i had been engaged twice, but then broke it off due to them being batshit crazy. does that help clear up your memory? :D

Nickhead 07-24-2017 12:10 AM

quick, board, dane is going to spend the next two hours searching my posts to try and prove i have been married more than once. now is your time to collectively post your thoughts without fear of McCumBubble interrupting the convo :D

kccrow 07-24-2017 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nickhead (Post 12970570)
this is where you let your ego get in the way of reality. i may have mentioned my kids and their mother(s), but i never said i was married before my current wife. i had been engaged twice, but then broke it off due to them being batshit crazy. does that help clear up your memory? :D

If you figured out 2 were batshit crazy, what made you think the 3rd wouldn't be? All women are ****ing crazy.

Nickhead 07-24-2017 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12970555)
Here's the problem, Genious (CP spelling): I have an Eidetic Memory.

Good luck!

more like idiotic memory then ROFL

DaneMcCloud 07-24-2017 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 12970574)
If you figured out 2 were batshit crazy, what made you think the 3rd wouldn't be? All women are ****ing crazy.

At that point, it's the man, not the woman


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.