ChiefsPlanet
Page 19 of 20 « First 915161718 19 20
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   QB Class Starting to Look Like S&@* (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=242050)

Pitt Gorilla 03-01-2011 02:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by billay (Post 7460457)
Never said that. Give your own take so far you haven't you've just trolled the thread.
uh, what?

Bewbies 03-01-2011 03:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by billay (Post 7460435)
Yea Gabbert is Manning. God forbid someone come on here and have a different take than others it makes you reerunedROFL
Gabbert isn't Manning, but looking at a single game as your evidence of greatness or suck is reeruned. You are reeruned.

Bewbies 03-01-2011 03:07 PM
Also Mr Billay, lest you accuse me of being a MU homer, I live in Georgia, and root for the Dawgs.

I did grow up in Iowa though, so I do have personal experience dealing with the reeruned nature of Iowa and Nebraska fans. Biggest morons in the football world, which is saying something coming from SEC country.

Brock 03-01-2011 03:07 PM
OMG, billay has been missed. LMAO

Titty Meat 03-01-2011 03:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bewbies (Post 7460557)
Gabbert isn't Manning, but looking at a single game as your evidence of greatness or suck is reeruned. You are reeruned.
You must have missed the part where I said the last half of the season

milkman 03-01-2011 04:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bewbies (Post 7460427)
Good thing the Colts didn't draft the QB that couldn't beat Florida.

Are you reeruned?
Manning is a bad example.

Chiefnj2 03-01-2011 04:40 PM
For those who have watched Gabbert in more than 2 games, why is his accuracy so low for a "spread" QB?

BigCatDaddy 03-01-2011 04:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 7460795)
For those who have watched Gabbert in more than 2 games, why is his accuracy so low for a "spread" QB?
Prepare for a lot of bitching about drops by the receivers.

Bewbies 03-01-2011 04:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7460729)
Manning is a bad example.
The only QB without questions I can think of is Elway. Pick any other then....

aturnis 03-01-2011 05:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bewbies (Post 7460260)
We have a guy on this board that would take Stanzi with a 2nd, but wouldn't touch Newton with anything higher than a "late" second? Am I reading that he'd take Stanzi over Cam Newton?

The homervision is strong in this one.
You are an idiot. I said I don't think Newton is worth any more than a late 2nd. Also said I would take Stanzi with OUR second, which happens to be a late 2nd. So there is nothing there saying I would take Stanzi over Newton, but only b/c I would not take Newton at all. Think it'd be a waste of a draft pick.

At worst, Stanzi is a solid backup for years to come. Whereas Newton may not last in the league through his first contract. Give an idiot like that money...real smart. Not to mention his drop is horrible, his accuracy sucks on everything but the deep ball and he can't make reads.

You guys go ahead and blow your load on potential, I'll pass.

DaneMcCloud 03-01-2011 05:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 7460891)
You are an idiot. I said I don't think Newton is worth any more than a late 2nd. Also said I would take Stanzi with OUR second, which happens to be a late 2nd. So there is nothing there saying I would take Stanzi over Newton, but only b/c I would not take Newton at all. Think it'd be a waste of a draft pick.

At worst, Stanzi is a solid backup for years to come. Whereas Newton may not last in the league through his first contract. Give an idiot like that money...real smart. Not to mention his drop is horrible, his accuracy sucks on everything but the deep ball and he can't make reads.

You guys go ahead and blow your load on potential, I'll pass.
LMAO

Bewbies 03-01-2011 07:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 7460891)
You are an idiot. I said I don't think Newton is worth any more than a late 2nd. Also said I would take Stanzi with OUR second, which happens to be a late 2nd. So there is nothing there saying I would take Stanzi over Newton, but only b/c I would not take Newton at all. Think it'd be a waste of a draft pick.

At worst, Stanzi is a solid backup for years to come. Whereas Newton may not last in the league through his first contract. Give an idiot like that money...real smart. Not to mention his drop is horrible, his accuracy sucks on everything but the deep ball and he can't make reads.

You guys go ahead and blow your load on potential, I'll pass.
I rest my case your honor. LMAO

'Hamas' Jenkins 03-01-2011 07:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 7460795)
For those who have watched Gabbert in more than 2 games, why is his accuracy so low for a "spread" QB?
He had two really bad completion games, one where he had a concussion, and the other where his receivers literally did not have an inch of breathing room. People dog on him for that Nebraska game, and it's bullshit. He put the ball in places that NFL QBs don't have to. His guys were that blanketed.

He was still way over 60%, and he did it with a poor supporting cast and a horrible running game.

SAUTO 03-01-2011 08:00 PM
Lots of idiocy in this thread all if a sudden.
Posted via Mobile Device

milkman 03-01-2011 08:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 7461237)
Lots of idiocy in this thread all if a sudden.
Posted via Mobile Device
All of a sudden?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:41 AM.
Page 19 of 20 « First 915161718 19 20
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.