![]() |
Some people just don't get it.
Quote:
|
Quote:
That 30% rule refers to the tender for a FRANCHISE TAG for an UNRESTRICTED free agent. The 1st round tender they placed on Brandon Carr was a RESTRICTED free agent tender. You need to educate yourself on the difference between restricted and unrestricted free agents. In the 2011 free agency period, Carr was a restricted free agent. At that point, the Chiefs are allowed to place a tender on Carr. Carr can negotiate with other teams, but the Chiefs have a right to match any offer. If the Chiefs decide to not match another team's offer, that team must give KC a draft pick that corresponds with the draft pick tender they placed on Carr. In other words, once the chiefs placed a 1st round tender on Carr, any team that wanted to sign Carr while he was a restricted free agent forfeits a 1st round pick to KC. That tender has absolutely zero bearing on what happens to Carr in the 2012 free agency period, when he becomes an unrestricted free agent. That tender is not what makes Carr an unrestricted free agent. He becomes unrestricted by nature of serving his 4th year in the league. The 30% stuff that you are talking about is related to a franchise tag tender which is in no way related/tied to the UFA tender. They are two completely different kinds of tenders. You are an idiot and have wasted several posts arguing with Dane over something you are completely ****ing confused about. |
Quote:
|
I know CP encourages new membership and the like but I think it's time that we had some kind of a test one must pass to become a full fledged member.
|
Quote:
|
has there been a CP Noob of the year contest/award/vote yet. I know there is something like that around here, but anyway this year you dont even have to go through all the trouble of making a thread and nominating users just hand the trophy to BlackBob
|
Quote:
|
FYP
Quote:
|
Quote:
Do you like Cassel? If No then GOTO Chiefsplanet. If YES then GOTO Chiefscoallition Etc... |
Quote:
Yes, we could have signed to a bigger contract IF a team had offered him a deal and we wanted to match it but that was the only way we could have tried to sign him before March. No one offered and therefore the 30% rule was in effect. In fact it was in effect by the old cba definition for 2011 as part of the new cba agreement. Dane's argument was that we could resign him and he was ****ing wrong. We never had a shot until he hit the UFA market. The players love this rule. They always have. Sometimes guys even get released because of it. The 30% rule was a different angle I was taking to the same fact. THE FACT THAT WE COULD NOT RESIGN CARR UNTIL MARCH. Don't try and spin this. You don't know the whole deal either but, just like Dane, you should. I described it in detail and gave a link you dumb ****. Hell, I even posted a link to the CP discussion about it months ago. This exactly the sort of thing I am talking about. People don't read around here. There is a whole ****ing section in the cba about the "30 PERCENT RULE." |
Quote:
What a ****ing dumbass you are.LMAO |
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ss2hULhXf04" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
Blackbob is right about B. Carr. It was pretty widely known that we couldn't sign Carr until March. And he took his dream job for the cowboys
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
STFU |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.