![]() |
Quote:
I've repeatedly said that signability is still an applicable term (which is why we passed on Porcello and Wieters, in order to spread more money throughout the draft rather than tie a ton up in one player), but we're definitely not cheap. |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And I'm sorry, but "David Glass is cheap" is a statment that started to fall apart as soon as he began handing out big contracts to guys like Meche and Butler (and Greinke), and when they starting paying out the yin-yang for draft picks and latin american players. Yes, the major league payroll is low this year, but they're tunneling much more money into the minor leagues, those players are starting to cycle up to the major league level, as we've seen with Hosmer and Duffy, and will probably see with Moustakas and others sooner rather than later, and eventually those guys are going to have to be paid. If, in three or four years, those guys are all playing in some other uniform because Glass isn't willing to pay what it takes to retain them, then I'll be happy to come back and redress this, but for right now, you're just blowing smoke when you're talking about the Royals being cheap in the draft. That's all I was saying yesterday. Be as bitter as you want to be. Roll around in that defeatist quagmire all you want, man. I got no problem with that. I'm not exactly mr. sunshine and rainbows myself. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It's looking like if the Royals want the best college arm available, Bauer is the guy. I spent some time watching his YouTube vids, and that dude is filthy. Not the build you're necessarily looking for in a #1 starter/high pick, but hard to argue with the results. His warm up is interesting, as for his first warm up toss on the mound, he gets a running start and just lets loose a throw as hard as he can possibly throw it.
|
Quote:
Money hasn't been a problem for a while now, our problem has been GM stupidity. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Spending money just to be spending money is how the Royals got to the point they're at right now. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
So I'll start to care again then. I had some expectations that we would see tangible improvement in 2011, but so far, they're just as bad as ever. Look at our starting pitching rotation. That has to be the worst in MLB by far. Chen is your go to guy, and the season collapses when he falls out of the rotation? Hey, I admire your optimism. I really do. And you know what? Maybe in the next 30 years you'll be rewarded with an 80-win season. In the meantime, you night want to give Harold Camping a ring out in California and give him all your worldly goods. He promises the rapture is coming in October. He wouldn't lie to you twice.... |
Quote:
Quote:
See, that's what you don't get. I'm not optimistic. I'm realistic. I don't know if the Royals are going to be any better in 2013 than they are now. I only know that there's a chance they will be. What I don't have are expectations. I'm smart enough to know this was a 65-70 win team in 2011. So I'm not disappointed when they lose a few games. And I'm not ecstatic when they win a few. Hell, any baseball fan who swings back and forth like that's going to have a ulcer by the end of the year anyway, what's the point? It's a 162-game season. It's silly to rise and fall with every loss and win. Anyway, I'm not optimistic. I just watch and see what happens. I don't predict success. I don't predict failure. I don't cry into my barbecue when they lose and I don't shoot off fireworks when they win. And I certainly don't rant on bulletin boards about how much they suck and how they've always sucked and how they'll always suck because golly-gee willikers nothing in the world ever changes. Wahh wahh wahh. Quote:
|
blowfish, you ignoramus. Yes, the Royals organization has told the fans to "wait a few years" on numerous occasions. Yes, the Royals have pissed down the fans backs before with those kinds of positions. It was obvious that they were pissing down our backs to anyone that knows even half of what you pretend to know about baseball.
THIS TIME is different though. Why? Because it isn't just the Royals saying it. It's everybody in the entire MLB, every scout, every journalistic source, everyone. It's universal, and that has never happened before. |
Guys, we'll just have to agree to disagree.
One last thing: The Royals dumped $44 million in salary from last years team, including trading the ace rotation starter and three starting position players. Let's look at how those 2010 trades are working out so far: Greinke/Bentancourt trade: Greinke 4-1, ties best record for any Royals pitcher thus far (Chen) and Greinke was out for a month with a rib injury. Betancourt at .232. Escobar hitting .204, but much better defense. Let's call that a push. If Escobar can hit at all, it might be an OK trade. Jeffress 1-1, but no major impact. Cain and Odorizzi still in minors, no impact at all. Milwaukee is 2GB in their division. DeJesus trade: Mazzaro has epic record pitching meltdown and banished to minors. DeJesus starting for A's, hitting .254. A's are 5 GB. Callapso trade: O'Sullivan 2-5 with a 6.92 ERA, Callapso hitting .298 for Angels, who are 2.5 GB. DM has been on the job for five years. In those five years, the team has lost 90 or more games all but one of those years, and finished in last or next to last in all of those years. He was given a contract extension to 2014. After this home stand (which is off to a poor start vs worst team in the AL) 60% of the team's remaining games are on the road. Another 90 loss season is looking probable. I guess when you expect nothing, you can't be disappointed. At least Omaha is in first in their division, but NW Ark has lost five straight. I'm sure Glass will do something to fix that soon. He hates watching his hometown team lose. Enjoy the rest of the season. I'm ranted out. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.