Quote:
|
If Kietzman is so concerned about developing downtown KC why doesn't he put his $$$$$ where his big mouth is and 1) Encourage 810 to move their offices downtown (they are currently in Overland Park, I believe), 2) Move downtown (Kietzman currently lives in Lenexa I'm pretty sure).
|
Quote:
If the Jackson County voters don't approve this, I think my Governor will step up to the plate. A new stadium over in Wyandotte County would be nice. :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The great, storied fans of Baltimore thought that way. So did the venerable fans of the Browns. What happened to those teams? |
Clark would be stupid to move the Chiefs to L.A. That city has no interest in the NFL, as evidenced by two, TWO franchises moving the same year. Oh, the NFL wants to have a team there for the TV revenues, but the city just seemingly couldn't care less.
|
Quote:
Quote:
A new stadium averages what, $500-$700 million? Figure the post tax profit of the Chiefs is what, $20 million? The cost of a new stadium to the Chiefs (at the above mentioned 50% rate) would be around $250-$350 million dollars? That would take 100% of the Chiefs net profits for 12.5 to 17.5 YEARS? Of these teams that have paid 50%, what are THEIR annual profits? Sorry, but if this report is accurate regarding the Chiefs profits, asking them to pay 50% is inexcusable for a small market team. I would not be surprised to see them move to a large market city, bump their annual profit to $100 million, and then OFFER to pay 50%. |
This guy wants more $ to go to education and health care. I would which senario achieves that goal?
a) levy a 3/8 cent new tax to meet obligations on an existing lease that keeps both Major League sports franchises in town. b) don't levy a tax and risk both sports franchieses leaving town, at which time, KC becomes an oversized version of Wichita, Des Moines or Omaha. Being a city on the decline would surely make all the problems he is so concerned about better. |
Here is why LA is going to be a good deal for some franchise, even if fan support is low. The reason the last two teams left was for lack of good stadium facilities (i.e. luxury boxes). LA has a ton corporate cash to pour into luxury boxes. If they have the right stadium, an LA franchise will be hugely profitable, even with a half-full stadium. The NFL wants a franchise there so bad, that they will no doubt help finance the stadium. Once the right stadium is in place, LA becomes a no brainer. Income from regular seats are no longer the major local revenue stream for most NFL teams. That is, the ordinary fans just don't matter that much.
The income from an LA franchise will be large enough to allow a team to offer large signing bonuses. That will allow them to compete for free agents. A competent owner will be able to put a good team on the field there. If the team is successful, folks will show up for the game, even in LA. |
the Dallas Texans/KC Chiefs/LA Chieftains
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Even the mighty NFL (and other teams/owners) knows how good Kansas City is for the league. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.